Wakf Amendment Act 2013 Central Section 28 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: wakf amendment act 2013 central section 28 Year: 2019 Page 1 of about 307 results (6.066 seconds)Surender Kumar vs.m Salim
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2019
to determine the best user and optimum utilisation of the wakf properties the wakf was created for the aulad children successors as pious religious or charitable and as per the wakf amendment act 2013 a wakf alal aulad to the extent to of the tenant under section 14 1 e of the act relevant portions of the said judgment are reproduced as under religious or charitable and as per the wakf amendment act 2013 a wakf alal aulad to the extent to which the 09 2016 passed by the learned additional rent controller 02 central tis hazari courts hereinafter trial court in eviction petition e difference between tenants of wakf and non wakf properties under section 14 1 e of the drc act for the purposes
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPunjab Wakf Board Vs. Sham Singh Harike
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
..... section 6 1 of the wakf act 1954 by central act 69 of 1984 came to be considered the explanation which was added in section 6 1 by 1984 amendment ..... of the wakf tribunal 44 section 83 sub section 1 has been substituted by act 27 of 2013 substituted sub section 1 is as follows section 83 1 ..... be brought before a civil court if it is not the 28 jurisdiction of the civil court is not excluded but if the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrijesh Gupta & Anr. Vs.premia Projects Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
..... since section 434 of the companies act 2013 is amended by the eleventh schedule of the code the amended section 434 ..... combination of these professions which the central government shall constitute for the tribunal or ..... the powers conferred by this section 28 section 481 of the companies act 1956 reads as follows 481 ..... supreme court in the case of hamdard wakf laboratories v dy labour commisioner ors .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCfsit, Inc vs.shakti Bhog Foods Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
..... since section 434 of the companies act 2013 is amended by the eleventh schedule of the code the amended section 434 ..... combination of these professions which the central government shall constitute for the tribunal or ..... the powers conferred by this section 28 section 481 of the companies act 1956 reads as follows 481 ..... supreme court in the case of hamdard wakf laboratories v dy labour commisioner ors .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSicom Ltd. Vs.hanung Toys & Textiles Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
..... since section 434 of the companies act 2013 is amended by the eleventh schedule of the code the amended section 434 ..... combination of these professions which the central government shall constitute for the tribunal or ..... the powers conferred by this section 28 section 481 of the companies act 1956 reads as follows 481 ..... supreme court in the case of hamdard wakf laboratories v dy labour commisioner ors .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbhinandan Kumar Jain vs.mvl Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
..... since section 434 of the companies act 2013 is amended by the eleventh schedule of the code the amended section 434 ..... combination of these professions which the central government shall constitute for the tribunal or ..... the powers conferred by this section 28 section 481 of the companies act 1956 reads as follows 481 ..... supreme court in the case of hamdard wakf laboratories v dy labour commisioner ors .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtul Chandra Das(d) tr.lrs. Vs. Rabindra Nath bhattacharya(d)tr.lrs.&a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-04-2019
and official trustee of west bengal or the commissioner of wakfs or the official assignee or the official receiver of the act section 37 a was incorporated by way of an amendment in the state act reading of section 37 a brings money lenders act 1940 hereinafter referred to as the state act it is her contention that the suit filed by the state act is repugnant to section 58 c of the central act namely the transfer of property act the contention runs matter falls under article 254 2 therefore despite the inconsistency section 37 a of the state act will prevail in the to secure rs 8000 bhattacharyas mortgaged by conditional sale on 28 11 1959 the plaint schedule property in favour of bholanath
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjith Kumar Rai Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-2019
issued on 20 02 2019 in shifting keshava murthy to wakf board temporarily due to election to the parliamentary seat of required to be answered in view of writ petition being amended and additional prayer being sought when the said writ petition him to approach the court if there is cause of action 19 here the catch situation is how the tribunal felt parent department to revenue department by order dated 13 2 2013 as per 6 b of guidelines regarding transfer of government was issued by the government at the instance of election commission the said notification was issued by the government on 20 was incumbent of the office of tahasildar devanahalli as on 28 12 2017 where he was posted for the first time
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyeda Nazira Khatoon (D) by Lr. Vs. Syed Zahiruddin Ahmed Baghdadi and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-2019
after his death nazira khatoon applied to the board of wakfs to be appointed as the mutawalli of the wakf estate son syed badruddin ahmed hereinafter last mutawalli was authorized to act as the sajjadanashin for one of the dargahs in the presiding officer allowed the appeal by judgment and order dated 28 02 2006 this was done on the basis of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTQazi Gulam Mehboob Subhani ( Since Deceased) Through: Lrs vs.delhi Wak ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2019
ahmad and mr mehvish advocates hameed m 9759755053 versus delhi wakf board ors respondents through mr wajeeh shafiq standing counsel for the dargah in accordance with the provisions of the waqf act further in these circumstances there is no need to pass taken the view that the judgment decree dated 4th march 2013 passed in cs no 151 2002 deserved to be stayed high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision 28 h november 2019 cm m 1448 2017 cm appls 46444
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT