Vote - Judgment Search Results

Jagir Kaur and ors. Vs. Majha Transport Company and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2004ACJ2101; (2003)134PLR758

viitey mittal j 1 it is an unfortunate case in which the claimant and minor children of the deceased pritam...

C. Lawihmingthanga Vs. State of Mizoram and ors.

Court: Guwahati

p p naolekar c j 1 the relevant facts necessary for adjudication of the issues involved in this case are...

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2004)49SCL117SAT

..... accepted that it would have been inconsistent with those understandings for richement sa to vote the special share inconsistently with such understandings mr du plessis was unable to indicate circumstances ..... the acquirer a common objective or purpose for substantial acquisition of shares or voting rights or gaining control over target company pursuant to an agreement or understanding and directly .....

Georgia Vs. Ashcroft

Court: US Supreme Court

house or the senate voted for the plan making the votes of the black legislators necessary for passage see id at

Swedish Match Ab and Swedish Match Vs. Securities and Exchange Board o ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

1 wimco ltd is a public limited company incorporated in india it is mainly engaged in the business of manufacture...

In Re: Nrb Bearings India Limited;

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

in favour as a percentage of voters who exercised their votes iv total votes excluding interested party in terms of number

Maharashtra Power Development Vs. Dabhol Power Company and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2003)117CompCas467

..... the second is that the election would be by majority vote of the voting power not taken into account in nominating a person in accordance with ..... elected in terms of article 10 13 with majority vote i do not propose to set aside his election but at the same ..... nomination under the preceding two sentences shall by a majority vote of the voting power not so taken into account nominate a candidate s so .....

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... it is rarely advisable to use such clumsy words as vote for or vote against 251 f supp 2d at 305 henderson j ..... stronger than the evidence that there has been actual vote buying or vote switching for soft money the joint opinion s citations ..... the united states congress and deliver california s 54 electoral votes to the democratic presidential candidate because voter registration voter identification .....

Branch Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states to conform their congressional electoral districts to the constitutionally required one person one vote standards in a world in which the role of federal courts in redistricting disputes ..... states to conform their congressional electoral districts to the constitutionally required one person one vote standards ante at 268 for justice stevens these decisions explain why congress passed 2c .....

Steri Mould (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)88ITD78(Delhi)

..... credited in profit and loss account under the head compensation vote right in their respective returns of income however the assessee claimed ..... shareholders agreement the articles and other arrangements with whirlpool to vote along with whirlpool and to be bound by the non competition ..... consideration received shown by these two assessees on account of voting in favour of wc usa is a business receipt or .....