Skip to content


Voidable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: voidable Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 36 results (0.09 seconds)
Oct 05 1933 (PC)

Gnanambal Ammal Vs. S. Vadivelu Pillai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-05-1933

Reported in: AIR1934Mad207; (1934)66MLJ351

sundaram chetty j 1 this civil miscellaneous appeal has been preferred by gnanambal ammal the mother of the minor subbaraya...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 1933 (PC)

Ramalinga Pandaram and ors. Vs. Anthonimuthu Vathiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-27-1933

Reported in: AIR1934Mad274; (1934)66MLJ358

horace owen compton beasley kt c j 1 the appellants here the plaintiffs in the suit claimed a declaration of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 1933 (PC)

Lingangouda Gurangouda Hiregaudar Vs. Sangangouda Bapugouda Hiregaudar

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-02-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Bom386; (1933)35BOMLR779; 145Ind.Cas.780

broombfield j 1 this is an appeal in forma pauperis from a decree of the joint first class subordinate judge...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 1933 (PC)

Arun Chandra Sinha Bahadur and anr. Vs. Sarojit Sen Gupta and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-15-1933

Reported in: AIR1934Cal44

..... the sale or whether the effect was only to render the howla voidable at the option of the action purchasers the learned judge upon ..... may explain why incumbrances should be absolutely void and under leases only voidable on the sale of a tenure 8 a relevant authority is ..... putni sale was to render the howla of the pro forma defendants voidable but not ipso facto void and patterson j was right in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1933 (PC)

The Official Receiver Vs. Segiraju Subbayya and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-03-1933

Reported in: 146Ind.Cas.530

..... taken by the learned subordinate judge that the official receiver only treats the deeds as voidable yet the insolvency court has jurisdiction in the case quoted above doonadula sriramula v ponakavira ..... to speculate i would therefore hold that even if the transaction is only regarded as voidable the insolvency court has jurisdiction to entertain the application the appeal must therefore be allowed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1933 (PC)

The Official Receiver Vs. Sagiraju Subbayya and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-03-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Mad527; (1933)64MLJ397

..... taken by the learned subordinate judge that the official receiver only treats the deeds as voidable yet the insolvency court has jurisdiction in the case quoted above dronadula sriramulu v ponakavira ..... to speculate i would therefore hold that even if the transaction is only regarded as voidable the insolvency court has jurisdiction to entertain the application the appeal must therefore be allowed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1933 (PC)

Mt. Azizunnissa Vs. Siraj HusaIn and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-23-1933

Reported in: AIR1934All507; 152Ind.Cas.146

..... upon him by mumtaz husain and that the said deeds are therefore voidable and not binding upon her on the other hand she pleads ..... when the plaintiff s own predecessor has made a transfer which in voidable and not void the claim to have such transfer set aside ..... suit so far as the plea of undue influence is concerned are voidable under section 19 a contract act the plaintiff cannot evade the limitation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 1933 (PC)

Rup NaraIn Singh and anr. Vs. Har Gopal Tewari and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-28-1933

Reported in: AIR1933All449

..... appellate court held that the mortgage deed was not void but only voidable at the option of the receiver or the court that had appointed ..... undischarged insolvent of property belonging to him is not void but only voidable at the option of the receiver or the court and is not ..... by the insolvent cannot therefore be wholly void it is no doubt voidable at the option of the receiver or the court for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 1933 (PC)

Rash Behari Naskar and ors. Vs. Haripada Naskar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-24-1933

Reported in: AIR1934Cal762,152Ind.Cas.561

..... the court should have held that the transaction was not void but voidable at the option of the executant and as he did not ..... of meeting this defence as regards the contention that the contract was voidable and not void the cheif point raised was that as harananda did ..... agreement is caused by undue influence the agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 1933 (PC)

Sokkmal Suganmull Vs. G. Lokanatha Achari and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-14-1933

Reported in: 147Ind.Cas.650; (1934)66MLJ361

..... a person who obtains possession of the goods under a contract voidable under section 19 or 19 a may make a valid pledge though the ..... to 1st defendant on 12th june was if at all only a voidable transaction and if before its rescission by the plaintiff it was pledged ..... indicates that a person in possession of goods under a contract voidable on the ground of fraud can make a valid sale to a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //