Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: visveswaraiah technological university act 1994 section 31 ordinances Page 1 of about 3,412 results (0.169 seconds)

H.N. Yoga Rajan Vs. Government Tool Room and Training Centre and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ50; ILR2009(2)Kar1750; 2009(3)KCCRSN93; 2009(4)AIRKarR444

..... university as an affiliated college of the university in accordance with the provision of the act. section 40 of the vtu act provides for affiliation of colleges to the university.13. it is thus clear that ..... the purpose of ensuring proper and systematic instruction, teaching, training and research in the development of engineering, technology and allied sciences in the state of karnataka and matters connected therein. sub-section (2) of section 2 of the visveswaraiah technological university act, 1994 defines 'constituent college', which means an institution maintained by the university as such and includes an institution admitted to the privileges of the .....

Sri Belimatha Mahasamsthana Institute of Technology Vs. Visveswaraiah ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(4)KarLJ623

..... , training and research in development of engineering technology and allied sciences. therefore, the core object of the entire ..... -11-2004, annexure-o passed by the university after inspection and after accepting the report in the matter of disaffiliation of the college and transfer of students to other affiliated colleges of the university.13. visveswaraiah technological university act, 1994 (for short, 'the act'), is an act established for the development of engineering technology and allied sciences. the purpose of the act is to ensure proper and systematic instruction, teaching .....

Visvesvaraya Tech.University Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of2016(arising out of s.l.p. (c) nos.5354-5359 of 2014) visvesvaraya technological university ...appellant versus assistant commissioner of income tax ...respondent judgment ranjan gogoi, j.1. leave granted.2. the appellant university, namely, visvesvraya technological university (vtu) has been constituted under the visveswaraiah technological university act, 1994 (for short vtu act ). it discharges functions earlier performed by the department of technical education, government of karnataka. ..... the university exercises control over all government and private engineering colleges within karnataka.3. for the assessment years .....

Smt.Anandavally M.K. Vs. Dr.P.G.Jairaj

Court : Kerala

..... that case was the examining body and affiliating authority for technical educational institutions in the state of karnataka. section 20(1) of the visveswaraya technological university act, 1994 empowers the executive council of the university to make regulations regarding admission of students and conduct of examinations. the academic senate wa2706/09 & con. cases 41 recommended the minimum eligibility for admission to b.e./ b ..... and facts of that case altogether are different from the facts of the present case. in that case the appellant university was a full-fledged university created under the bharathidasan university act and was recognised by the university grants commission. when the university commenced courses in technology in various disciplines, aicte filed a writ petition before the high court seeking a writ of mandamus to forbear the .....

S. Deepika Bhat and Others Vs. Union of India, Represented by Departme ...

Court : Karnataka

..... rules 5 of the rules of legal education, 2008, is in accordance with section 49 of the act and not contrary to section 24( 1) of the advocates act and hence, they are constitutional and valid in law." in visveswaraiah technological university and another vs. krishnendu haider and others, (2011) 4 scc 606, the apex court has crystallized ..... regulations can be traced to section 87, which makes it incumbent on the first vice chancellor to bring the pre-existing regulations made under the karnataka state universities act, 2000 in line with the requirements under the 2008 rules, as a temporary measure. the power to make suck regulations is no doubt in the ..... the system is rigid inter alia in respect of attendance in classrooms. combinations of subjects are also inflexible. 41. was the alternative system envisaged under the open university act in substitution of the formal system, is the question. in our opinion, in the matter of ensuring the standard of education, it is not. the distinction .....

Dalappa Vs. Bangalore University and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(6)KarLJ236

..... a case of non application of mind. he has produced sslc certificate at annexure-c.2. the petitioner refers to the provisions of the karnataka state universities act to contend that the petitioner is a teacher for the purpose of retirement. he has also filed various annexures in support of his contentions that he cannot ..... questions arise for my consideration:(1) whether the petitioner can be held to be a 'teacher' within the meaning of section 2(12) of the karnataka state universities act, 2000? (2) whether the definition of section 2(12) is available to the petitioner in the light of the definition being subject to the context 'otherwise ..... the context otherwise requires'.section 2(12) reads as under:'2. definitions.--in this act unless the context otherwise requires.- xxx xxx xxx 2(12) 'teachers' include professors, readers, assistant professors, lecturers and such other persons imparting instruction in the university or in any college declared as such by the statutes'. section 2(12) has .....

Debashree Chowdhury and anr. Vs. Visveswaraiah Technological Universit ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1531; 2006(3)KarLJ393

..... appropriate direction be issued. further he has relied upon the decision of this court in the case of kum. d.h. samudhayatha v. visveswaraiah technological university (vtu) and anr. ilr 2003 kar 302, wherein this court has followed the decisions rendered by the apex court reported in rajendra prasad mathur v. karnataka ..... the norms and requirements laid down by the central authority, the state authorities act illegally. 7. in view of the said observation made by the apex court, admittedly in the instant case, for the year 2002-03 when the petitioners ..... according to its standards or qualifications, as the case may be, although the applicant satisfies the standards or qualifications laid down by the central law, they act unconstitutionally. so also when the state authorities de-recognize or disaffiliate an institution for not satisfying the standards or requirement laid down by them, although it satisfied .....

Tesla Thomas Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... bodies.11. further, the reliance placed by the council in its counter affidavit on adhiyaman educational and research institute (supra) does not reflect the correct position of law. visveswaraiah technological university (supra) found that dr.preeti srivastava (supra) and state of t.n. v. s.v.bratheep wp(c).no.9782 of 2014 - 9 - [(2004) ..... in the 5th respondent college to the bhms course affiliated to the 4th respondent university.3. the petitioner's specific contention is that the central council for homeopathy, as per section 20 of the homoeopathy central council act, 1973 [hcc act], is empowered to prescribe the standards for admission to the course and the petitioner ..... against the academic bodies and respective states diluting such minimum standards and not in providing more rigorous standards of eligibility for admission.9. section 20 of the act which was specifically read out by the petitioner also speaks of the prescription of `minimum wp(c).no.9782 of 2014 - 7 - standards'. in such .....

Dr Aditya Narnoly and Ors Vs. Health

Court : Jharkhand

..... the gap on the question of enhancement of qualification. learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed reliance upon the same judgment in the case of visveswaraiah technological university and another vrs. krishnendu halder and others (supra) to buttress his submission.10. in order to deal with the second aspect of the matter relating ..... of qualification, selection etc are to be undertaken by the rims governing body in terms of the provisions of the rules and regulations framed under the act of 2002.15. it has been seen from the enclosed annexures, referred to hereinabove that in the matter of appointment of assistant professor in the ..... constituting the dental college. the state government accorded roster clearance as per reservation policy. ranchi university has granted affiliation and recognization of the dci has also been obtained. this is fully in consonance with the provisions of the act and rules, specifically rule 8.14. the second aspect relates to the enhancement of .....

K. Devaiah and Others Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by It ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... scase (8 supra) was a case where the university had fixed the minimum eligibility for b.e and b.tech courses, which was under ..... in question, has reasonable nexus to the object sought to be achieved. visveswaraya technological university v. krishnendu halder (2011) 4 scc 606) for the proposition that fixation of higher eligibility criteria by university/state government than the minimum prescribed by a central government body to achieve excellence ..... act coming into force. what is the rational basis for such a presumption? none. this fact assumes significance particularly in the light of the fact that all the institutions from where the candidates obtained their b.ed. qualification have themselves received recognition from the regional council after the ncte act came into force. visveswaraya technological university .....