Court : Chennai
..... work on cuddapah stones. during polishing, a cuddapah stone fell on his leg and caused grievous injuries. he made a claim under the workmen's compensation act before the commissioner and the learned commissioner allowed the claim. the employer filed an appeal and the appeal was allowed on the ground that the claimant does ..... circumstances, this court held that the defence of the commissioner was a pervers.one and hence the findings were reversed under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act. in the present case, the learned counsel for the appellant is not able to point out any perversity in the findings rendered by the commissioner. in fact ..... 2015 proprietor, alagar blue metal (crusher).town palayam, ariyalur road, perambalur district.appellant vs v.palanivel .respondent appeal filed under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923, against the order dated 05.08.2013 in w.c.no.244 of 2010 on the file of the commissioner for workmen's compensation tribunal, tiruchirappalli. ! .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... almost similar set of circumstances by the ao involving a number of similarly placed assessees giving rise to common questions concerning application of section 68 of income tax act were dismissed by another division bench of this court by judgment rendered on 31.01.2011 reported as cit v. oasis hospitalities pvt. ltd. (2011) 333 ..... leave petition was dismissed in limine with the following observations:2. can the amount of share money be regarded as undisclosed income under s. 68 of it act, 1961?. we find no merit in this special leave petition for the simple reason that if the share application money is received by the assessee company from ..... 23. more often than not, questions have been arising in assessment proceedings respecting sums found credited in the books of accounts of companies incorporated under the companies act in the context of their efforts to raise capital through shares, pursuant to which they receive applications along with share application money from various persons. if .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... , the appeal is allowed. conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 in c.c.no.11 of 1998 on the file of the court of enquiry commissioner and special judge, kozhikode is hereby set aside. he shall be set ..... in his drawer, is plausible. therefore, it could not be said that accused tacitly accepted illegal gratification or obtained same within meaning of s. 5(1 )(d) of act thereby entitling him to benefit of doubt." 21. therefore the legal position is clear that in the absence of substantive evidence to prove the alleged demand for bribe and payment ..... enquiry commissioner and special judge, kozhikode. he was found guilty under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (in short, the act"). the conviction and sentence imposed by the court below is challenged in this appeal. prosecution case, in brief, is that the accused, a sub engineer in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... in infringement of plaintiff s copyrighted works. broadcasting/ re-broadcasting/ telecasting/ downloading the copyrighted content of the plaintiff company so as to result in acts of infringement of the plaintiff s copyright. using the trademark aap ki adalat either as a application software/ computer programme, trademark, trading style, name ..... the interim order is not passed.33. accordingly, till the next date of hearing, the defendants, their subsidiaries, agents, distributors, advertising agencies, acting for them on all electronic medium are restrained from: making available for downloads/broadcasting/re- broadcasting or in any manner unauthorizedly using the plaintiff s ..... application/ computer program is run and is available on different platforms including android market now known as google play.29. the defendants are indulging in acts of piracy, which is completely illegal, unlicensed and malafide, of the plaintiff s tv show content and broadcasts thereof upon which the plaintiff has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... in infringement of plaintiff s copyrighted works. broadcasting/ re-broadcasting/ telecasting/ downloading the copyrighted content of the plaintiff company so as to result in acts of infringement of the plaintiff s copyright. using the trademark aap ki adalat either as a application software/ computer programme, trademark, trading style, name ..... the interim order is not passed.33. accordingly, till the next date of hearing, the defendants, their subsidiaries, agents, distributors, advertising agencies, acting for them on all electronic medium are restrained from: making available for downloads/broadcasting/re- broadcasting or in any manner unauthorizedly using the plaintiff s ..... application/ computer program is run and is available on different platforms including android market now known as google play.29. the defendants are indulging in acts of piracy, which is completely illegal, unlicensed and malafide, of the plaintiff s tv show content and broadcasts thereof upon which the plaintiff has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... tribes, de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000 (maharashtra act no.xxiii of 2001) in a seat reserved for scheduled castes candidate by producing a caste certificate, which was invalidated by an order of the ..... certificate and verification of such certificate and also providing for deterrent punishment for those who indulge in such illegal activity. 15. section 3 of the said act deals with application for a caste certificate, and it is reproduced below : "application for a caste certificate - "3. any person belonging to any ..... tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000 (maharashtra act no.xxiii of 2001)("the said act") was brought into force in the state of maharashtra on 18-10-2001 by the notification dated 17-10-2001 published in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of the document must, of course, be proved. according to him, if primary evidence is not available for the reasons set out in section 65, evidence act, only then secondary evidence is admissible. of course before adducing secondary evidence, proper foundation has to be laid for not producing primary evidence. only after non- ..... learned counsel for the respondents-plaintiffs has vehemently argued that the will requires proper proof as per the mandatory provisions of section 63, indian succession act and section 68. evidence act. he has argued that the evidence of dw2 is not sufficient to vouchsafe the authenticity of the will. he has further argued that ex.p141 ..... .v. prabhat singh, it is contended that photocopy of the document in the absence of the original is not admissible in evidence. in the commentary on evidence act by dhirajlal and ratanlal (23rd enlarged edition) 2013, in the last sentence, it is observed as follows: 'sometimes from the pleadings, implied notice to the adverse .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... legislatures in regard to similar pieces of legislation enacted by the latter. (25)................the power of licensing new industrial undertakings was thereafter exercised by the centre under act 65 of 1951 as amended by act 26 of 1953, vide ss.11 (a), 12 and 13, and the power of fixation of price of sugar was exercised by the centre under s ..... the by-products of sugarcane. w.p.no.21982/2014 is filed by a sugar manufacturer challenging the validity of the karnataka sugarcane (regulation of purchase and supply) act, 2013, ['2013 act' for short] and also the notification, dated 23.11.2013 and the consequential show cause notice, dated 12.5.2014 demanding the payment of amounts towards the ..... .3 of act 24 of 1946 by issuing the sugar control order, 1950. even the power reserved to the state government to fix minimum prices of sugarcane under chap .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 27 in regard to similar pieces of legislation enacted by the latter. (25) .the power of licensing new industrial undertakings was thereafter exercised by the centre under act 65 of 1951 as amended by act 26 of 1953, vide ss.11 (a), 12 and 13, and the power of fixation of price of sugar was exercised by the centre under s.3 ..... from the by-products of sugarcane. w.p.no.21982/2014 is filed by a sugar manufacturer challenging the validity of the karnataka sugarcane (regulation of purchase and supply) act, 2013, [ 2013 act for short]. and also the notification, dated 23.11.2013 and the consequential show cause notice, dated 12.5.2014 demanding the payment of amounts towards the purchase ..... of act 24 of 1946 by issuing the sugar control order, 1950. even the power reserved to the state government to fix minimum prices of sugarcane under chap. 5 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... the above said attesting witness examined in earlier proceedings clearly deposed about the execution and attestation as prescribed by mandatory provision of section 68 of indian evidence act and there is no need to further evidence to prove the above said will. the learned counsel further submitted that in spite of it, the appellants ..... by subbiah nadar, in favour of the appellants and the above said will has been proved as per mandatory provision under section 68 of indian evidence act. the learned counsel further submitted that the sole available attesting witness was already examined in the earlier proceedings and the above said deposition was marked in ..... ex.b18 executed by avudayammal and ex.b15 executed by subbiah nadar have clearly proved as prescribed in the mandatory provisions under section 68 of indian evidence act and therefore, prayed for to set aside the finding of both courts below and dismissed the suit.15. thelearned counsel appearing for the appellants contended that .....
Tag this Judgment!