Utilize - Judgment Search Results

City of Plantation Vs. Utilities Operating Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... co inc 379 u s 2 1964 u s supreme court city of plantation v utilities operating co inc 379 u s 2 1964 379 u s 2 city of plantation ..... v utilities operating co inc appeal from the supreme court of florida no 72 decided october 12 .....

Alhambra Trucking Vs. Public Utilities Comm., California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... al v public utilities commission of california appeal from the supreme court of california no 288 decided october 19 ..... california 379 u s 14 1964 u s supreme court alhambra trucking v public utilities comm california 379 u s 14 1964 379 u s 14 alhambra trucking co et .....

Badri Prasad Sadashivrao Vs. District Judge, Shri G.R. Kale

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1964MP264

and one special power of attorney which he desired to utilise for his appearance on behalf of the party or parties

Bharat Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. New Delhi Vs. the Commissio ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1964SC1800; [1964]34CompCas683(SC); [1964]53ITR108(SC); [1964]7SCR626

romer l j thought that there was nothing objectionable in utilising premiums received on the issue of shares for the purpose

In Re: Standard General Assurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1965Cal16

invest and deal with its money but if the company utilised the power of investment as it stood under the existing

Kettlewell Bullen and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC65; [1964]53ITR261(SC); [1964]8SCR93

an alter ego of the managed company with authority to utilise theexisting structure of the company s organisation to carry on

Commissioner of Income-tax,madras Vs. Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit Fund L ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC96; [1964]53ITR241(SC); [1964]8SCR204

may not hold any deposit with thefund and may not utilise the borrowing facilities afforded by the fund but maybe content

Bagsu Devi Bafna Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Others.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1966]62ITR506(Cal)

disclosed ground was otherwise established and the undisclosed materials were utilised merely as supporting materials for the finding the finding need

Rabi Narayan Upadhyaya Vs. Kanak Prova Debi

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1965Cal444

december 1950 was for rs 1 000 he wanted to utilise this difference in price in these deeds as proof to

Smt. Bagsu Devi Bafna Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1966Cal73,69CWN66,[1967]63ITR333(Cal)

disclosed those facts to the petitioner if he wanted to utilise them against him by not doing so he fell within