Skip to content


Until Other Provision Is Made - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: until other provision is made Year: 1929 Page 1 of about 332 results (1.329 seconds)
May 27 1929 (FN)

Chesapeake and Ohio Ry. Co. Vs. Stapleton

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-27-1929

to prescribe additional regulations and what they may deem auxiliary provisions for the same purpose in such a case the legislation expressive of what its intention is as the direct provisions made by it this doctrine was fully recognized by this court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1929 (PC)

Sait Asunim Sada Suk Bhattadu Vs. the Sub-collector of Rajahmundry and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-23-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Mad577; (1930)58MLJ318

he undertook to pay the total amount there is no provision made for the payment of interest and therefore he is the high court and the decree of the high court made the claimants 1 and 2 in the two appeals before

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 1929 (PC)

Putta Chelamiah and anr. Vs. Venkata Kumara Mahipati Suryarao Bahadur ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-29-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Mad1; 121Ind.Cas.765

..... the section that directly relates to the record of rights the only provision made is this every entry in a record of rights so published ..... to in such entry and shall be presumed to be correct until the contrary is proved 13 this does not declare that any ..... recovery of possession or the question of ownership arises in some other proceedings whether according to his contention he would be prepared to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1929 (PC)

Sait Asuram Sada Suk Bhattach Vs. the Sub-collector of Rajahmundry and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-23-1929

Reported in: 123Ind.Cas.47

he undertook to pay the total amount there is no provision made for the payment of interest and therefore he is 15 10 and the respondents nos 1 and 2 were made liable to pay the government by way of costs rs

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 1929 (PC)

(Badam) Seshiayya Vs. (Grandhi) Sattiraju

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-30-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Mad414

general rule is that parties may waive the advantage of provisions made to protect their own interest but not of those made to protect their own interest but not of those made to protect the interest of others or of the public

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 1929 (PC)

In Re: Yeshvantibai Eknath Vijaykar

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-21-1929

Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR999; 122Ind.Cas.135

..... cartright s case 1 freem 258 12 where there is a clear provision made by the indian succession act i am not at liberty to follow ..... lays down save as otherwise provided by this act or by any other law for the time being in force all grants of probate and ..... use and benefit of the minors until the elder of them attains majority this application can only be made under article 246 indian succession act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 14 1929 (PC)

Radhakissen Dhanuba Vs. Bombay Co. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-14-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Cal51,121Ind.Cas.574

otherwise and all proceedings thereunder shall be governed by the provisions contained in schedule 2and para 18 of schedule 2 provides word court presumably therefore applications under para 18 should be made to the court of trial as in england section 2

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 30 1929 (PC)

Probhat Chandra Adhikari and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-30-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Cal366

court in which the offence is committed subject to the provisions of ch 35 or the court of the presidency magistrate to the fact that an offence under section 228 is made triable by the court in which the offence is committed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 1929 (PC)

Tota Meah Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-06-1929

Reported in: AIR1929Cal298

section 239 and that under section 239 there is no provision made by which accused 1 in addition to being charged 239 and that under section 239 there is no provision made by which accused 1 in addition to being charged with

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 30 1929 (PC)

Prabhat Chandra Adhikary and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-30-1929

Reported in: 125Ind.Cas.853

the provisions of chap xxxv of the code and this provision in the 8th column contrasts with the provision made in this provision in the 8th column contrasts with the provision made in respect of an offence which also comes under section

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //