Court : Delhi
1. whether reporters of local papers may no. be allowed to see the judgment?2. to be referred to the reporter or not? no.3. whether the judgment should be reported no. in digest?1. this is a petition for grant of probate of the will dated 4th december, 1997 executed by late shri anand parkash goel, husband of the petitioner.it is alleged in the petition that late shri anand parkash goel had executed a will dated 4th december, 1997. he died on 24 th july, 2004 and was survived by four class-i legal heirs i.e. his widow/petitioner smt. geeta devi test goel and three sons namely shri nitin goel, shri rohit kumar goel and shri ajay kumar goel.2. the citation was published in "indian express" (new delhi edition) and notice issued to the non-applicant legal heirs of the deceased testator was also duly served on them. non-applicant legal heir ajay kumar goel filed no objection in the form of an affidavit on his behalf as also on behalf of other non-applicant legal heir rohit kumar goel, who has executed a power of attorney in his favour.3. non-applicant legal heir nitin goel was proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 6th february, 2009.4. the petitioner has examined three witnesses including herself. pw-2 shri s.l. mehrotra and pw-3 shri k. venkatasubramanian are the attesting witnesses of the will dated 4th december, 1997 executed by late shri anand parkash goel. both of them stated that the will was signed by late shri anand parkash goel on 4 th december, 1997 in their presence and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... case pertains to year 1985 and the appellants not only suffered injuries but also could not prosecute their complaint against anis ahmed (complainant) and his associates and that appellant jubair was dispossessed from his bakery, a lenient view may be taken by the court while awarding sentence to them.56. ..... cots and clothes set on fire belonged to the accused persons and not to the complainant or his associates, it was urged that due to this reason charges under sections 427 and 436 ipc were not ..... 141 of the penal code are to be taken into account which are extracted thus: an assembly of five or more persons is designed as unlawful assembly if the common object of the person composing that assembly is:firstly: to over awe by criminal force or show of criminal force, the central or any state government or legislature of any state, ..... his right to private defence on seeing that the complainant and his associates including deceased were duly armed and were assaulting abdul malik and mohd. ..... whatever they were discussing in the gali was audible in the bakery shop of jubair so as to give them an opportunity to form an unlawful assembly with the common object of causing murder of ishtiak and causing hurt to pw-2 anis ahmed, pw-4 mohd. ..... section 304 ipc as even the prosecution case is that the churri was picked subsequently by jubair from his bakery shop which rules out any premeditation or formation of any unlawful assembly with the common object to kill the complainant or his associates.16. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... dharamshala at 1.30 pm on 3rd july 2009 is a clear indicator that the deceased ranbir singh was already in their custody by that time as they could not have known that the deceased and his associates were staying at jain dharamshala unless he was in their custody and had been interrogated by them. ..... the further case is that ranbir singh and his two associates ram kumar (pw10) and ashok panwar stayed at flat no.9 of jain dharamshala ..... circumstances unerringly point to the culpability of a1 to a7 for abducting the deceased, unlawfully detaining him and then killing him by indiscriminate firing in a fake encounter. ..... learned hand this distinction is important today when many prosecutors seek to sweep within the dragnet of conspiracy all those who have been associated in any degree whatever with the main offenders. ..... that two or more persons pursued the same unlawful object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. ..... the english law as to conspiracy has been stated thus- "conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. ..... merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. ..... the offence of unlawful abduction by the police of the deceased from the place of the scuffle on mohini road and detaining him in custody thereafter till the time of his death in a fake encounter is clearly .....
Tag this Judgment!