Union Territories Direct Election To The House Of The People Act 1965 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results

Union of India (UOi) Vs. Association for Democratic Reforms and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC2112; 2002(3)ALD90(SC); 2002(3)ALLMR(SC)228; 2002(2)BLJR1317; 97(2002)DLT657(SC); JT2002(4)SC501; (2002)3MLJ55(SC); RLW2002(4)SC487; 2001(4)SCALE110; (2002)5SCC294

lal 1985crilj516 k veeraswami v union of india 1992 iillj53bsc union carbide corporation v union of india air1992sc248 delhi judicial service and sections 4 and 14 of the government of union territories act 1963 20 of 1963 or b that there has issued by the high court and that candidates must be directed to furnish necessary information with regard to pending criminal cases no 2 34 right to know about the candidates contesting elections 35 now we would refer to various decisions of this and democratic form of government b the election to the house of people and the legislative assembly is on the basis parliament to make necessary amendments in the representation of the people act 1951 or the election rules and therefore court cannot of the people act 1951 hereinafter referred to as the act 0 so as to make the electoralprocess more fair transparent 102 173 and 191 part ii of this act and sections 4 and 14 of the government of union territories act was said 11 the obligation of this court under article 32 of the constitution for the enforcement of these fundamental rights

Patil Panduranga Venkanagouda Vs. Horatti Basavaraj Shivalingappa and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2000Kant78; 1999(5)KarLJ467

has been holding office of profit under the government either union or state as specified in 1st schedule the state of the constitution or this act or the government of union territories act 1963 20 of 1963 19 as mentioned earlier the but as the government has supervisory power it could issue directions to the appointing authority if it appeared that 1st respondent in aid code for secondary schools conduct rules 1966 the election petitioner s case is that as the first respondent was petition under sections 81 and 83 of the representation of people act 1951 the petitioner has challenged the election and declaration to be registered in accordance with the provisions of this act and rules made thereunder notwithstanding anything contained in any other order1 by this election petition under sections 81 and 83 of the representation of people act 1951 held that both respondents are entitled to the costs separately 36 the petitioner having failed to establish the case against the

Satish Ukey Vs. Devendra Gangadharrao Fadnavis

Court : Supreme Court of India

people s union for civil liberties pucl and ors v union of india uoi and ors 2 in the said case chief electoral officers of all the states and the union territories issued in this regard would also require a close look taken by the court of law as regards the second directive parliament has substantially proceeded on the same lines and made 26 prescribed under the said rules several letters of the election commission of india to the 4 chief electoral officers of before the returning officer for election to name of the house from constituency name of the constituency part a i of section 3 of section 8 of the representation of the people act 1951 43 of 1951 and sentenced to imprisonment for b the details of cases section s of the concerned act s and description of the offence s for which convicted delivering to the returning officer the nomination paper under sub section 1 of section 33 also deliver to him an affidavit to issue revised instructions to ensure implementation 12 of section 33 a subject to what is laid down in this judgment

P.Chidambaram Vs. R.S.Raja Kannappan and ors.

Court : Chennai

10 00 a m one o l chelliah aiadmk party union secretary of sakkottai of sakkottai union karaikudi taluk sivaganga parliamentary the constitution or this act or the government of union territories act 1963 or b that any corrupt practice has been not disclose any cause of action or the power to direct the concerned party to strike out unnecessary scandalous frivolous or duty date and time are not set out in the election petition hence the allegations in this regard in paragraph nos party arriving by two vans and they went to every house and after speaking to them for voting in favour of d ii iii iv and 123 of the representation of peoples act 1951 6 the brief facts set out in the cases a where it does not disclose a cause of action b where the relief claimed is undervalued and the plaintiff that the election petitioner does not satisfy the requirements of section 83 of the representation of peoples act 1951 15 1 requires detailed trial further in the judgment reported in 1999 3 supreme court cases 267 d ramachandran vs r v janakiraman

Manohar S. Prabhu and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR130

..... union territory to be filled by persons chosen by direct election shall be forty in the case of the union territory of himachal pradesh and thirty in the case of any other union territory its sub section 3 ..... from the representation of the people act 1951 though no guidelines were ..... being a member of either house of parliament under the provisions ..... singh v state of rajasthan 1965 1scr933 however in golak .....

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

court in the decision in virendra pratap and another vs union of india and others a writ petition was instituted seeking b not more than twenty members to represent the union territories chosen in such manner as parliament may by law provide scope of this court s power to make the above directions analysis whether delimitation commission can amend the 2006 notification under reservations of the scheduled tribes in the uttar pradesh assembly elections in accordance with proportional representation in terms of article 330 as scheduled castes and scheduled tribes for reservation in the house of the people and state legislative assemblies by taking into number of seats to be reserved in the house of people as well as the legislative assemblies in accordance with the securing the due constitution of the house 44 the delimitation act 2002 is an outcome of the exercise of the power scheduled tribes of the state 12 17 in terms of section 8 the delimitation commission is empowered to determine the seats and are governed by the formula stipulated under article 332 3 hence it was urged that they had to be treated

A.P. Scheduled Castes Welfare Association and Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004AP381; 2004(2)ALT604

and b not more than twenty members to represent the union territories chosen in such manner as parliament may by law b not more than twenty members to represent the union territories chosen in such manner as parliament may by law provide made out to issue mandate as prayed for if any directions as prayed for are issued it would also amount to seats or nomination of seats has to be made before election notification is issued 7 it is further alleged that the be necessary to readjust the allocation of seats in the house of the people to the states and the division of time withholding of elections would only amount to depriving the people to elect government of their choice particularly at a stage 82 and 170 by virtue of the constitution 42nd amendment act 1976 by the said amendment act a proviso was added constitution of india particularly in accordance with articles 330 and 332 thereof 3 in the other writ petition w p no

K.Surendran Vs. Election Commission of India

Court : Kerala

addressed to the chief electoral officers of all states and union territories and annexure c is the letter issued by the through impersonation that at present all the states and union territories have photo electoral rolls pers and making the database of the day of poll quot the presiding officers may be directed to verify such voters through any additional document along with identity documents like authenticated photo voter slip issued by the election machinery is one which furthers and facilities the conduct of 4 2014 directing that for the general elections to the house of people 2014 and the state legislative assemblies of andhra follows quot art 326 elections to the house of the people and to the legislative assemblies of states to be on be registered as a voter at any election the impugned action is one aimed at balancing the right to vote with make reference to some of the provisions in this regard section 61 v of the representation of people act 1951 provides powers are conferred on the election commission as per article 324 of the constitution it is specifically stated in para 14

B. Rajesh Kumar Vs. State of A.P. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD339; 2000(5)ALT504

..... union territory in the house of the people as the population of the scheduled castes in the state or union territory or of the scheduled tribes in the state or union territory or part of the state or union territory ..... passed act 17 of 1994 suitably amending section 23 of the a p municipalities act 1965 the said amendment was in conformity with the constitutional mandate under article 243 t elections .....

Raja Ram Pal Vs. the Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(2)SC1; (2007)3SCC184

..... direct election from territorial constituencies in the states and not more than 20 members to represent the union territories chosen in such manner as parliament may by law provide article 83 prescribes the duration of houses ..... contemplated under section 8 of representation of people act 1951 read ..... 1964 up assembly case 1965 1 scr 413 a ..... under section 99 of the act vide section 8 a of the act iii if .....