Unauthorised Development - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: unauthorised development Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 151 results (0.086 seconds)Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Rep. by Its Member Secretar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-05-2002
Reported in: (2002)2MLJ431
..... or done in contravention of such permission section 56 empowers the removal of such unauthorised development by the competent authority before taking any decision the appropriate planning authority has to ..... the final determination of the application section 57 of the act empowers to stop unauthorised development by issuing a notice section 79 says that any person aggrieved by any decision .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaja Bahadur Motilal and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-26-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)ALLMR429; 2003(1)BomCR251
..... in contravention of the provisions of the first proviso shall be deemed to be an unauthorised development for the purposes of sections 52 to 57 6 the planning authority shall within one ..... directing and commanding respondent nos 2 to 6 to forthwith cancel and or withdraw the development permission granted vide commencement certificate dated 11th april 2001 exhibit k hereto permitting respondent no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuri-konark Development Authority Vs. Ratna Bhadra and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Ori207; 94(2002)CLT95; 2002(II)OLR128
..... with simple imprisonment fine or both section 91 deals with removal of unauthorised development it specifies that where any development has been commenced or is being carried on or has been completed ..... estates and provide public amenities one of its paramount duties is also to regulate development construction and use of land including private lands and undertake schemes for improvement and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshok Madan Vs. Director Town and Country Planning Deptt.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-07-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ4447
..... himachal pradesh town and country planning act 1977 prescribes penalty for unauthorised development or for use otherwise than in conformity with development plan by any person whether at his own instance or at ..... published in the himachal pradesh rajpatra on 31 3 1979 after publication of interim development plan permission of development of any land in shimla planning area is to be obtained from the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.T. Sundaram Vs. Veerateswaran,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-02-2002
Reported in: (2003)1MLJ353
..... in conformity with the act it further provided power to the authorities require removal of unauthorised development hence the entire scheme of the act is for the purpose of ..... not be questioned in any suit or other legal proceeding this court in chennai metropolitan development authority vs abdur rehman reported in 2002 2 ctc 230 while considering pari materia provision .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHotel Sea Gull Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-19-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC1506; (SCSuppl)2002(3)CHN89; JT2002(3)SC195; 2002(3)SCALE29; (2002)4SCC1; [2002]2SCR576
..... section 2 a therof section 54 of the act empowers the concerned authority to stop unauthorised development in terms thereof section 55 as well empowers the concerned authority to require removal of ..... unauthorised development or use having regard to the development plan prepared or under preparation or to be prepared and to any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaveen Construction Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: 2002VIAD(Delhi)707; 2002(62)DRJ252
..... no 2 is set aside arbitration act 1940 award objections construction work in respect of development of unauthorised colony dispute arisen between the parties and referred to arbitrator award passed by the ..... mukundakam sharma j 1 the parties hereto entered into an agreement for development of an unauthorised colony in trans yamuna area and laying down water line in school block shakar pur .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Development Authority Vs. Darshan Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2002
Reported in: 2002VAD(Delhi)1024; 97(2002)DLT573
..... section 10 and 15 of the public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1971 the suit had sought injunction against the delhi development authority dda for restraining it from issuing any demand ..... whether the suit is barred under section 10 and 15 of public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1971 4 the learned trial court treating the issue as preliminary issue and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGh-13, Paschim Vihar Dda (Sfs) Flats Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2002
Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)73
..... contravention of the master and zonal plan of delhi accordingly the delhi development authority demolished the unauthorised constructions and structures however it was ruled that the direction to avail ..... area residential line in jwalapuri is being misused for commercial purposes and illegal and unauthorised structures have come up the occupants of these structures who are doing commercial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSanju Panda (Advocate) Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-19-2002
Reported in: 94(2002)CLT26; 2002(II)OLR189
..... notifications and apart from that whether there are any other unauthorised constructions made in violation of the orissa development authorities act and the building regulations by opposite party no ..... to take steps for demolition of all unauthorised constructions made in violation of the coastal regulation zone notifications the orissa development authorities act the building regulations and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial