Skip to content


Transplantation Of Human Organs Amendment Act 2011 Central Section 14 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: transplantation of human organs amendment act 2011 central section 14 Page 1 of about 313 results (2.885 seconds)
Jul 24 2014 (HC)

Mrs.N.Ratnakumari Vs. State of Odisha and Others

Court : Orissa

..... act which was amended in 2011 1995 a p toho act is the only act which governs the field and neither central act of 1994 no the transplantation of human organs rules 1995 hereinafter 1995 rules no the transplantation of human organs amendment act 2011 hereinafter 2011 act ..... criminal procedure by virtue of code of criminal procedure amendment act 2008 14 analyzing section 41 1 b cr p c which is alleged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 08 2010 (HC)

Pepsico India Holdings (Pvt) Limited and Another. Vs. State of U.P. an ...

Court : Allahabad

where cognizance has been taken under section 22 of the transplantation of human organs act 1994 toho on a complaint filed has been taken under section 22 of the transplantation of human organs act 1994 toho on a complaint filed by the illegal the said judgment relates to the transplantation of human organs act 1994 which has been referred to as toho therein act through the act no 34 of 1976 by this amendment graded punishment based on the degree of violation was introduced are in force on the date of commencement of this act shall continue to be in force till the date of so deems fit decide within the period prescribed by the central government as per the gravity of offence whether the matter pursuant to the said government order the authorities are invoking sections 272 273 ipc without following or applying the provisions of s and agents of the company as available under article 14 and 21 of the constitution of india and have consequently

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

Abdul Khader Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... in jeevan kumar raut anr v central bureau of investigation air2009sc2763 the hon ble supreme court has held that by virtue of section 22 of transplantation of human organ act where a particular procedure has ..... regulations 2011 as annexure r3 a they prayed for dismissal of the application 8 heard both sides 9 the counsel for the petitioners sri sasthamangalam ajithkumar submitted that chapter xiv of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 2012 (HC)

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

..... act 1986paragraph 12offences under the transplantation of human organs act 1994paragraph 13offences under the juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000paragraph 14offences under the emigration act 1983paragraph 15offences under the passports act ..... amendment act 2009 the proviso under section 5 1 was substituted by two provisos this amendment ..... in central ..... of 2011 dated 10 8 2011 ..... 14 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2017 (SC)

Nikesh Tarachand Shah Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... prohibition and regulation act 1986 transplantation of human organs act 1994 juvenile justice care and protection of children act 2000 emigration act 1983 passports act 1967 foreigners act 1946 copyright act 1957 trademarks act 1999 information technology act 47 2000 biological diversity act 2002 protection of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 2011 (HC)

P. Ajayan Vs. State of Kerala, Represented by the Public Prosecutor an ...

Court : Kerala

..... the commission of offences punishable under transplantation of human organs act 1994 was justified in law it ..... section 1 2 of the amending act act 26 of 2007 specifically provide that the amending act shall come into force only on such date as the central ..... in crl m c 679 of 2011 advocate sri pulikkool aboobacker the learned ..... as a whole ibid p 440 14 the presumption against retrospective operation is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 2013 (HC)

Dijil Vs. the Sub Inspector of Police, Kunnamkulam Police Station

Court : Kerala

..... considering a similar provision under the transplantation of human organs act in jeewan kumar raut s ..... provisions of the central act and kerala rules section 23a of the central act provides for compounding ..... takes his goods again or other amends upon an agreement not to prosecute ..... and others 2011 2 khc 83 2011 3 klt 1 and 2011 3 klj ..... continued once the case is closed 14 in black s law dictionary 6th .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 2013 (HC)

Ritu JaIn @ Neeru Sood Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

where cognizance has been taken under section 22 of the transplantation of human organs act 1994 for short toho on a has been taken under section 22 of the transplantation of human organs act 1994 for short toho on a complaint filed been taken under section 22 of the transplantation of human organs act 1994 for short toho on a complaint filed by 2011 o m parliament would take appropriate measures to suitably amend the law in the near future so far as the to be a property delivered by dishonestly inducing or the act is punishable only under section 471 ipc if observations of 2 of section 4 crl misc not m 10241 of 2011 o m however specifically provides that offences under any other misc not m 10241 of 2011 o m of the central government the petitioner cannot be charged for cheating i have procedure in a case where cognizance has been taken under section 22 of the transplantation of human organs act 1994 for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2018 (SC)

Common Cause (A Regd. Society) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... section 24 of the transplantation of human organs and tissues act 1994 namely transplantation of human organs and tissues rules 2014 where form of authorisation for organ ..... of the federal constitution fourteenth amendment 56 rehnquist cj in his opinion ..... uncertain descriptions of key concepts central to the debate are notions such ..... economic political weekly april 30 2011 at page 14 69 alexandra mullock end of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2013 (HC)

P.Nagaraj Prabhu Vs. Director of Medical Education

Court : Chennai

has been proposed that the said act also regulate the transplantation of tissues of the human body therefore it is proposed vii insertion of new section 13 c to establish national human organs and tissues removal and storage network viii to provide a healthy balance between the need for transplantation of human organs and tissues in order to save lives on the one national registry of the recipient of human organs transplants ix amendment of section 14 to appoint a quot transplant coordinator quot constituted to examine the lacunae in implementation of the said act the recommendations of the said committee were examined along with 24 in respect of the rule making power of the central government quot b in the decision b l nagaraj and otherwise of the essential ingredients to be established under sub section 3 of section 9 of the act presence of an the recipient of human organs transplants ix amendment of section 14 to appoint a quot transplant coordinator quot in all hospitals

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //