Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(1)ALT113
..... of several unknown persons.36. it is also stated that the petitioner's objection to the said allotment of shares is a belated attempt to jeopardize smooth trading in the shares of the company. the petitioner grievance against the said shares is misconceived, suffers from delay and latches and misdirected against the innocent allottees of ..... shares in the event of writ petition being allowed by this court. therefore, the learned counsel prays for an interim order directing the third respondent not to trade, or create third party interest in respect of the shares already allotted to sixth respondent.though initially learned counsel for respondents 3 and 6 opposed the said ..... apply in relation to the amalgamation of a company owning an industrial undertaking with another company.71. in union of india v. krishna mills ltd. (1994) 81 company cases 81, it was held that the present act being a special statute in relation to sick industrial companies, it will prevail over the general provisions of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(6)ALT563
..... to establish that cancellation of licence of the bank is vitiated by any of the infirmities constituting grounds for setting aside the decision.80. in union of india and anr. v. international trading co. and anr. : air2003sc3983 the supreme court held that a person is not entitled to relief by claiming negative equality. it was held ..... directions for winding up of the bank and appointed sri v. amrender rao, joint register/ managing director of a.p. state co-operative union limited, hyderabad as liquidator under the 1995 act. the liquidator assumed charge on 8.12.2004.19. one pattern suryaprakash rao, s/o late pattern venkateshwar rao, claiming to be a ..... financial position as on 31.3.2002. the inspection report revealed deteriorating financial position of the bank and its violation of the various provisions of the 1949 act and directions issued thereunder. the report also revealed the bank's failure to repay the matured deposits. after supplying the inspection report to the bank and noticing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(6)ALD517; 2007(6)ALT259
..... , the learned counsel for the petitioners while placing reliance upon the decision of the supreme court in indian metals & ferro alloys ltd. v. union of india : air1991sc818 wherein it was held that the applications for grant of mining lease cannot be disposed of on a 'first-cum-first- ..... discretionary jurisdiction of a high court to grant relief under article 226 of the constitution of india.34. in whirlpool corporation v. registrar of trade marks : air1999sc22 , the supreme court while observing that the power to issue prerogative writs under article 226 of the constitution is plenary in ..... .2007 government of a.p. submitted the clarifications.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------25.5.2007 government of india granted the prior approval undersection 5(1) of the act.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------31.5.2007 show-cause notice issued by the government of a.p. tothe petitioner in w.p no. 14818 of 2007 calling .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(4)ALT808
..... the allegations contained in the first information report taken on their face value constitute an offence under the provisions of the act.12. sri a. rajasekhar reddy, learned assistant solicitor general appearing for union of india submitted that the scheme approved by the government of india is different from the scheme which the 1st petitioner ..... 29-3-2003, the secretary, government of india, ministry of consumer affairs, had clarified that the pyramid structured marketing scheme fall within the provisions of the act. therefore, the mere fact that the approval accorded by the government of india has not been cancelled or withdrawn is not sufficient to stultify the investigation of ..... view of the above, sarvashri bihari lal murarka, shambhu prasad mukherjeeand swapan kumar guha appear to have been carrying on the business in the trade name of 'sanchaita investments' in prize chits and money circulation scheme in violation of section 3 of the prize chits and money circulation schemes (banning .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(5)ALD832
..... temples without consent of dharmakarthas. but, there is no divestment of management under section 34 of a.p. charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments act, 1966 (act no. 17 of 1966, for brevity). therefore, the plaintiff cannot be treated as office holder or servant of ttd. the plaintiff and his predecessors ..... defeated. with a view to remedy the same and to effectuate proper and efficient management and governance of charitable and hindu religious institutions and endowments, the act was enacted. instead of management by a single person, chapter iii introduced in sections 15, 17, 18 and 19 as a composite scheme prescribing ..... the court of subordinate judge, devakottai, passed a decree against veerappa for recovery of money. he filed an application under section 19 of madras agriculturists relief act to scale down the debt, the application was dismissed. he then filed civil miscellaneous appeal, which was converted into civil revision petition. the decreeholder argued .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(3)ALD173; 2007(2)ALT386; [2007(114)FLR253]
..... view that although a dispute relating to an individual workman cannot per se be treated as an industrial dispute (it can be so treated) if espoused by the trade union or a large number of workmen.21. in central provinces transport services v. raghunath gopal patwardhan 1957 (1) llj 27 (sc) their lordships of the supreme ..... 1958.form-k-4(see sub-rule (6) of rule 11)application by a workman under sub-section (2) of section 2-a of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (central act no. 14 of 1947).before the labour court at..between:i....(applicant)and.(employer)the applicant... s/o...aged.... years was working as.... m/s. ... and ..... dismissal, discharge, retrenchment or termination of service of the workmen came to be treated as an industrial dispute, the working of the conciliation machinery envisaged under the act proved to be extremely tardy. the demands raised by the workmen remained pending with the conciliation officers for years together apparently because the legislation does not prescribe .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2006(6)ALT523; 2007(1)CTC97; AIR2007AP57; 2007(2)AIRKarR382(FB)
..... corporation limited v. bharati industries : air2006sc198 , after referring to state bank of india v. state bank of india canteen employees union : (1998)5scc74 , chairman, grid corporation of orissa v. sukamani das : (1999)7scc298 and national highways authority of india ..... the owner or on the stranger. in the present statutory dispensation, namely transfer of property act, contract act, specific relief act and registration act, the court does not see any prohibition operating on the exercise of inherent power by the ..... by the parties, then also ordinarily an application for a judicial review is not accepted. see whirlpool corporation v. registrar of trade marks : air1999sc22 . there is justification for the principle. clive lewis in 'judicial remedies in public law' (first edition ..... jawand singh air 1947 nag. 236 : ilr 1947 nag. 190; devendra nath sarkar v. ram rachpal singh ilr (1926) 1 luck 341 : air 1926 oudh 315; saiyed mohd. raza v. ram saroop ilr (1929) 4 luck 562 : air 1929 oudh 385 (f .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2006(2)ALD585; 2006(2)ALT289; [2006(110)FLR282]; (2006)IIILLJ570AP
..... punjab. : [1967]2scr762 . this principle was subsequently followed and applied in several cases by the supreme court both in the constitutional and statutory context indira sawhney ii v. union of india : air2000sc498 ; gangaram moolchandani v. state of rajasthan : [2001]3scr992 ; managing director, ecil, hyderabad v. b. karunakar : (1994)illj162sc .15. the construct ..... 147 had stated there are no degrees of nullity. this was considered a fundamental rule and in hoffmann la roche & co., v. secretary of state for trade and industry (1975) ac 295 lord diplock clarified that void is the correct term to be employed in any such context and added; it would, however, ..... misconduct or misbehaviour against a government servant, it may itself inquire into, or appoint under this rule or under the provisions of the public servants (inquiries) act, 1850, as the case may be, authority to inquire into the truth thereof.explanation:- where the disciplinary authority itself holds the inquiry, any reference in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(6)ALD582; 2005(6)ALT364
..... above, the commission, a permanent expert body, constituted in accordance with the directions of the supreme court in indra sawhney v. union of india (129 supra), under act 20 of 1993, has been entrusted with the functions of identifying backward classes of citizens for inclusion in the list of backward ..... are caste and religion - neutral.96. the commission has neither found nor recorded that self-employment in petty business, occupations like rickshaw pulling, push-cart trade, agricultural labour, marginal land ownership, mal-nutrition, inaccessibility to medical facility, lower life expectancy, engagement as unskilled labour, masons or drivers, pursuit of ..... apparent that in the considered view of the commission the higher unemployment rate; the lower share in salaried employment; predominant self-employment in petty trades and as rickshaw pullers, push-cart traders and labourers; the relatively lower monthly expenditure indicia; marginal land ownership, pervasive mal-nutrition coupled with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2006(2)ALT523
..... 79. kota steel re- rolling mills pvt. ltd. v. the commercial tax officer (1982) 49 stc 80 (rajasthan division bench), and polar marmo agglomerates ltd. v. union of india (rajasthan division bench). learned counsel, placing reliance on the judgment of a full bench of the madras high court in rimmalapudi subba rao v. nooni veeraju : air1951mad969 ..... central excise, jaipur 2004 (8) supreme 473. hindustan zink ltd. v. commissioner of central excise, jaipur 2005 (3) scj 54 : : 2005(181)elt170(sc) .hyderabad industries v. union of india : 1995(78)elt641(sc) . collector of central excise, chandigarh v. steel strips ltd. 1995(77) slt 248(sc). aman marble industries pvt. ltd. v. collector central excise ..... and as such an appeal lies only to the supreme court under section 35-l of the central excise act and not to the high court under section 35g. reliance is placed on the judgment in navin chemicals mfg. and trading co. ltd. v. collector of customs 1993(68)elt 3 (sc).10. learned asst. solicitor .....
Tag this Judgment!