Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: madhya pradesh Page 5 of about 49 results (0.141 seconds)

Aug 13 1958 (HC)

Chunnilal Ken Vs. Shyamlal Sukhram and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP50; 1959CriLJ199

..... 11. although with a view to check the summary and unrestricted jurisdiction of courts in treating contempt, the indian legislature has enacted 'the contempt of courts act (act no. 12 of 1926)', yet what constitutes 'contempt of court' has not been defined. in england the law has its roots in common law. blackstone in his commentaries referred ..... to the appellate jurisdiction of the high court, i have no hesitation in holding that an election tribunal is a court subordinate to high court.9. the act complained of is that non-petitioners nos. 1 and 2 in the pamphlet in question published the following :--'election petition es dksbz rar ugha gs ;g ..... virendar kumar v. state of punjab, (s) air 1956 sc 153, their lordships while considering whether proceedings under section 36 of the representation of the people act were before a court or not, observed :'while the proceedings before the election tribunal approximate in all essential matters to proceedings in civil courts, the proceedings under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1965 (HC)

Chhatradharilal Gangaram Supedar Vs. Shyamabai Ramsewaklal Agrawal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1966MP67

..... tendency under english law has been to restrict rather than to enlarge the scope and operation of the law of fixtures, and various exceptions have been allowed in favour of trade fixtures and agricultural fixtures: bain v. brand, (1876) 1 ac 762 at p. 772, mears v. callender, (1901) 2 ch. 388, notes to elwes v. maw, (1802) ..... immoveable property' as defined in section 3(26) of the general clauses act, includes land, benefits to arise out of the land and the things attached to the earth, etc., so that standing crops would be immoveable property. but that definition is ..... in the legal incidents thereof; such incidents include, where the property is land, all things attached to the earth. but, by virtue of section 2(d) of that act, transfers in invitum are saved from the application of that section. except section 57and chapter iv, nothing affects a transfer in execution of a decree. 6. no doubt ' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1958 (HC)

Masalkhan S/O Kalandar Khan Vs. Custodian of Evacuee Property and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP256

..... which, according to him, supported his contention, viz., asmat ullah v. custodian, evacuee property, u. p. lucknow, (s) air 1955 all 435 (fb), burhanpur national textile workers union, burhanpur v. labour appellate tribunal of india, (s) air 1955 nag 148, and joginder singh waryam singh v. director, rural rehabilitation, pepsu, (s) air 1955 pepsu 91. ..... computing the period of limitation for an application for final decree in a mortgage suit as in jowad hussain v. genddan singh, 53 ind app 197: (air 1926 pc 93). but as pointed out by sirlawrence jenkins in delivering the judgment of the privy council in jascurn boid v. prithichand lal, 46 ind app 52 ..... lordships, it is necessary to see what kind of tribunals, the assistant custodian, custodian and deputy custodian general are. section 28 of the administration of evacuee property act (xxxi of 1950) is as follows :'28. save as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, every order made by the custodian-general, authorised deputy custodian, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2004 (HC)

Parbhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)20VST853(MP)

..... in legislating the object, purpose, and scope of the legislation that the word is used subjectively of the legislator, rather than objectively of the matter legislated upon.in union colliery company of british columbia limited v. bryden [1899] ac 580 (pc) 587, lord haldane said:it is remarkable the way this board has reconciled the provisions ..... and joinery (p) ltd. v. state of orissa : [1988]1scr314 . similar view has been expressed in the decision rendered in the case of bhubaneshwar singh v. union of india : (1994)6scc77 wherein their lordships ruled that the legislature can make judgment and order of competent court ineffective if it removes the statutory vices which had led ..... act of 1998 and ultra vires of articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the constitution of india and to further issue a writ of certiorari for striking down the said provisions and to quash notice of demand contained in annexure p5.7. a counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondents stating inter alia that trade .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2015 (HC)

M/s. Tarnado Enterprises, Richhai and Another Vs. Union Bank of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... resorted to by the writ petitioners. 14. learned senior counsel for the petitioner has placed his reliance in the case of whirlpool corporation vs. registrar of trade marks. mumbai and others, air 1999 sc 22, and has contended that in the aforesaid law the apex court has categorically held that if an order ..... of certificate and amendment thereof, stay of proceedings under certificate and amendment or withdrawal thereof, other modes of recovery, and application of certain provisions of income tax act are prescribed. if an action is taken by the recovery officer beyond his jurisdiction while not empowered to take any action under section 31-a(2) and ..... and has raised the preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the petition before this court on the ground of availability of alternative statutory remedy of appeal under the act against the impugned order and delay of few months in filing the petition. however, it is also contended that recovery officer has the jurisdiction to execute .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1951 (HC)

Dayabhai Poonambhai Patel Vs. the Regional Transport Authority and anr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1951CriLJ1305

..... the other benefits to which the ruler of barwani was entitled under the agreement of 30-11-1947 were paid by the applicant & received by the govt. of the union. that in violation of the terms of the agreement the regional transport officer, indore-an employee of the madhya bharat govt. - by a notification published in the state ..... or incidental to the govt. developed upon the united state of madhya bharat & the latter undertook & was bound to discharge the same. that the govt. of the union adopted & continued the agreement of 30-11-1947 & the petitioner was allowed to operate his bus services in terras of the above mentioned agreement; that after the merger ..... toy the said agreement. it was contended that his was an illegal act in excess of the jurisdiction of the regional transport authority.3. the motor vehicles act (iv (4) of 1939) was adopted by the madhya bharat & came into force within the territories of the union on or about 1-10-1949. it is complained that the applications .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 1975 (HC)

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mooratsingh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1975CriLJ989

..... arrived at on the interpretation of the expression 'after perusing the record'. (see queen empress v. pohpi (1891) ilr 13 all 17l (fb). trimbak bal-want v. emperor. air 1926 bom 548 (1) : (27 cri lj 1167) and dashrath v. state, 1957 mpc 530 : (1957 cri lj 1405 (1)).11. from the fore-quoted decisions the law ..... to 423 and as such there being no provision for the withdrawal of appeal in section 423, the appellate court cannot permit its withdrawal: doing so would be acting in violation of the requirements of section 423.12. having construed the powers of the appellate court with reference to 'section 423, we would like to consider whether ..... 83&) (supra) with approval, seems to be of th view that the provisions contained in the aforesaid sections are exhaustive and art peremptory and the appellate court cannot act outside those provisions. after quoting the aforesaid sections, their lordships observed as under:it is clear from these provisions that on receiving the petition and a copy under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2009 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Ruchi Worldwide Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2009]97SCL383(MP)

..... filed by a natural born person alone.38. to appreciate the aforesaid contention, it would be relevant to first refer the judgment rendered by the apex court in union bank of india v. khader international construction : [2001] 5 scc 22. the supreme court in the said case was dealing with the question whether under order ..... senior counsel has also referred to certain other provisions contained in the rules. shri mathur has placed strong reliance upon a judgment of the apex court in commissioner of trade tax, up v. kajaria ceramics : air 2005 sc 2968, wherein it has been laid down that the word 'means' shows that the definition is exhaustive. ..... personal insurance, who could have approached the ombudsman with a complaint, and since the complaint in question had been filed by a company, incorporated under the companies act, therefore, such a complaint was not maintainable before the ombudsman, and consequently, the ombudsman had no jurisdiction to deal with such a complaint. reliance in this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2009 (HC)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shubhash Traders,

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(MP)372

..... no further clause empowering the high court to condone the delay. their lordships referred to sections 5 and 29(2) of the limitation act and took note of the, decisions rendered in m.v. elisabeth v. harwan investment & trading (p) ltd. : 1993 supp (2) scc 433, m.m. thomas v. state of kerala (2008) 1 scc 666, ..... sharda devi v. state of bihar : (2002) 3 scc 705 and union of india v. popular construction co. : (2001) 8 scc 470 and eventually held ..... provisions including section 5 of the limitation act will apply provided the special or local act provides a period of limitation different from that prescribed under the limitation act. there is an additional requirement viz. that the special / local act does not expressly exclude the application of the limitation act. it has been held in union of india v. popular construction co .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //