Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: andhra pradesh Page 2 of about 157 results (0.060 seconds)

Feb 11 1966 (HC)

Tirupathi Cotton Mills, Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ723AP

..... case of the petitioner that there is a labour union concerned there with known as 'tripathi cotton mills national labour union ' duly registered in accordance with the provision of the indian trade union act of 1926, of which most of the workers are the members that there is no other union of workers for this industrial establishment and the most ..... of the settlements with the management were entered into regarding various matter such as seles of wages etc.; through this union. while so certain workers ..... bargaining has come to stay, a single employee's case might develop into an industrial dispute, when, as often happens, it is taken up by the trade union of which he is a member, and there is a concerned demand by the employees for redress.the learned judge referred also to the following further observations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2000 (HC)

Pola Satyanarayana and Others Vs. Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD403; 2000(4)ALT274; (2000)IILLJ1278AP

..... 10 of the act. a division bench of the bombay high court while disposing of the wp no. 1431 of 1998 filed by airport authority kamgar union for abolition of engagement of contract labour, by order dated 18-8-1988, following the directions given by the supreme court of india in ah india gen. mazdoor trade union (regd) v ..... . delhi administration, 1995 supp. (3) scc 579, issued the following directions:(i) the petitioner union shall make a representation of its demand for abolition of contract labour in the concerned occupations, to the board ..... high court all through proceeded under the assumption that central government is the appropriate authority for issuance of the notification under section 10 of the act. in fact in united labour union v. union of india, flr 1990 (60), justice s.n. variava, as he then was held that in respect of air india corporation the appropriate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2000 (HC)

K. Vishnu Vs. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissioner, New D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD367; 2000(5)ALT166

..... . incidentally, we may mention that the' supreme court in m. veerappa v. evelyn sequeira, : [1988]2scr606 , having referred to the provisions of legal practitioners (fees) act, 1926, held that the legal practitioners are liable to be sued for negligence in the performance of their duties. with respect, we must point out that the supreme court did not ..... what is the nature and meaning of contract of personal service has been explained in indian medical association v. v.p. shantha, and in dr. a.s. chandra v. union of india, : 1992(1)alt713 .4. in ima case, s.c. agrawal, j., speaking for the supreme court explained the distinction between 'contract of personal service' and ..... no warrant to read down the wide definition of service' to exclude the legal professional as a class from the purview of the act.10. there is direct authority of the madras high court in srimathi v. union of india, : air1996mad427 , to support our view. it was observed by srinivasan, j., speaking for the division bench that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2001 (HC)

Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Hyd. and anr. Vs. All Indi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD747; 2001(6)ALT539

..... in practice enjoy greater prestige than the rationale of lesser judges.39. referring to quinn v. leathaim, (1990-1903) aer (rep.) 1, krishna kumar v. union of india, : (1991)illj191sc , commissioner of income tax v. sun engineering co. ltd, : [1992]198itr297(sc) , regional manager v. pawan kumar dubey ..... shiromanigurdwara prabandhakcommittee v som nath dass, : [2000]2scr705 . the learned counsel wouldurge that the act not only applies to hindureligious institutions alone but also tocharitable institutions belonging ..... hindu religious institutionand endowments is created, attracts theprovisions of 1987 act must be consideredhaving regard to the scope, object andpurport thereof. strong reliance in thisconnection has been placed on shyamkishori devi v patna municipalcorporation, : [1966]3scr466 , union ofindia v deoki nandan aggarwal,air 1992 sc 96 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2004 (HC)

Vallabhaneni Lakshmana Swamy and anr. Vs. Valluru Basavaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD807; 2004(5)ALT755

..... mr. shearman that he might base an argument on this passage, but he did not receive the suggestion with enthusiasm. i am clearly of opinion that the trade disputes act, 1906, section 4 is not declaratory so as to prevent the general rule against construing a statute retrospectively from applying. it is impossible, i think, to ..... , which was relied on by the full bench, an interesting complex question arose before the supreme court namely what was the law of limitation applicable to the union territories of goa, daman and diu. the proceedings launched therein prior to and pending at the date of liberation in respect of the partitions of properties of one ..... the fourth schedule in which-- (a) the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds rupees two hundred; or(b) ................................on december 23, 1926 i.e., after the new act came into force, the suit was decreed by the asst. collector. the defendant presented an appeal to the district judge and the said appeal was returned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1958 (HC)

Mahant Narayana Dessjivaru Vs. State of Andhra, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959AP471

..... place the managements of the various religious institutions on a better footing. by section 5 of that ad, the madras hindu religious endowments act, 1926 (act 2 of 1927) and the tirumalai tirupati devasthanams act 1932 (19 of 1933) were repealed. it was also provided by that section that the repeal shall not revive the arrangement made by ..... provisions of the constitution. to substantiate this proposition, reliance is placed by the learned counsel on narayanan nambudripad v. state of madras, : air1954mad385 and also shantisarup v. union of india, (s) : air1955sc624 . we are not inclined to read these rulings as lending any countenance to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. in ..... government of u. p. purporting to have been made under section 3(f) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, by which one of the partners of the firm was authorised to carry on the undertaking. the union of india later on wanted to accomplish the same object by issue of an order purported to have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2009 (HC)

Sravani Impex Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, M. Ranga Rao and anr. Vs ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT749

..... african nations, under the incentive scheme, i.e., duty entitlement pass book (depb scheme), extended by the director general of foreign trade (dgft) exercising powers under the foreign trade (development & regulation) act, 1992 (act 22 of 1992).4. on the warrants issued by the second respondent, the office premises of the petitioner company, its managing director and ..... 33 : 2006 (6) scj 907 : 2007 (3) alt 4.2 (dnsc)), particularly when the petitioner has an effective remedy under the act itself. (state of punjab v. bhatinda district co-op. milk producers union ltd. 2008 (3) scj 82 : (2007) 11 scc 363). but these are limitations imposed by the courts on themselves in exercise of ..... appeal preferred there against, by the union of india, the supreme court held that the power under section 3 of act 22 of 1992 was required to be exercised in the manner provided for under section 5 of the said act, that the provisions of act 22 of 1992, the foreign trade policy and the procedure laid down there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2000 (HC)

Channala Ramachandra Rao Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD652; 2000(2)ALT655

..... unreasonableness', first laid down in associated provincial picture houses v. wednesbury corporation, (1948) 1 kb 223. in tata cellular, the following passage from civil service union case was quoted with approval.' 'by irrationality', i mean what can now be succinctly referred to as 'wednesbury unreasonableness'. it applies to a decision which is ..... the wisdom of the state to make as many number of laws as are required to meet different situations. the state enacted hmc act, corporations act, as well as vizag act and vmc act. these enactments govern the municipal councils and municipal corporations and are existing enactments and there is no enactment to govern nagar panchayat. ..... the reserved classes.107. while considering point no.i as well as point no.ii, i have referred to various provisions of the constitution, the act, corporation acts and various rules. therefore, to avoid repetition, they are notagain being referred to except to the extent it is necessary.108. the chairperson rules .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2010 (HC)

Vuppalamritha Magnetic Components Limited Rep. by Its Managing Directo ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2010(174)LC169(AP)

..... nip on pta adopted by da were faulted by applying strict scrutiny standard and it was observed that section 9a of the act does not afford protectionism but only prevents unfair trade practices. if da acts arbitrarily and unreasonably, as held by apex court such exercise must be visited with invalidation.19. in saint-gobain glass ..... and the factors which shall be considered in such investigation. under section 9b(1)(b)(ii) of the act, the central government shall not levy add on any article imported into india from a member of world trade organisation (wto) or from a most favoured nation unless the central government makes determination that import of ..... india limited v. union of india : (2009) 240 elt 495 (delhi), supreme court held as under.in our opinion, the scope for interference in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1992 (HC)

Dr. A.S. Chandra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT713

..... is not a consumer. the definition includes also a person who hires any services for consideration. expressions like 'consumer dispute', 'defect', 'deficiency', 'service', 'trade are also defined by section 2. section 3 says that the provisions of the act shall be in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. chapter ..... which the expression 'consumer' is not defined. as it is denned in the consumer protection act, the delhi high court expressed the view that the consumer protection act and the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act are cognate legislations in regard to unfair trade practices and on that view held that consumer means 'a person who buys and uses goods'. we reject with no hesitation .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //