Time - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: time Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 308 results (0.135 seconds)Times Guaranty Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Perfect Pipes Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-28-2003
Reported in: 2004IAD(Delhi)335; [2005]127CompCas600(Delhi); 108(2003)DLT618; 2004(72)DRJ70; [2004]52SCL178(Delhi)
..... the petitioner to the respondent did not give the respondent 21 days time as required and as provided for under the said section it is ..... present petition was filed in this court after expiry of 21 days time from particular form of demand and that non specification of the period ..... amount in this court in that view of the matter one week time is granted to the respondent to inform the court about the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTime Warner Entertainment Co. L.P. and ors. Vs. R.P.G. Netcom Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2003
Reported in: 2003(27)PTC452(Del)
..... suit other prayers made in this application were not pressed at the time of arguments 4 i have heard learned counsel for the parties and ..... civil procedure 1908 5 of 1908 or any other law for the time being in force include a district court within the local limits ..... of whose jurisdiction at the time of the institution of the suit or other proceeding the person .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOn Time Couriers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jan-21-2003
Reported in: (2003)(2003)ECC280
1 after dispensing with the condition of pre deposit of duty i take up the appeals itself with the consent...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCymex Time Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-11-2003
Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT594Tri(Mum.)bai
1 the appellants are manufacturers of quartz alarm clocks in ssi sector the appellant placed an order favouring to m...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: News Item Published in Hindustan Times Titled and Quit Flow Mai ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-2003
Reported in: 108(2003)DLT592(SC); 2003(10)SCALE618; (2004)9SCC569
orders rajendra babu j 1 on 11 12 2001 this court made an order as follows i a has been...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCymex Time Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-06-2003
1 the appellants are manufactured of quartz alarm clocks in ssi sector the appellant placed an order favouring to m...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.M. Associates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Good Times Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-2003
Reported in: 2003(26)PTC428(Del)
..... plaintiff has to establish user of the mark prior in point of time than the impugned user by the defendants the registration of the mark ..... or similar mark prior in point of time to user by the plaintiff is irrelevant in an action for passing ..... what is of significance is that they are so closely proximate in time that neither one nor the other can claim to have built up .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Rishi Steel and Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-05-2003
..... alleging that the demand for the reversal of modvat credit raised by the department was time barred 3 the adjudicating authority accepted the plea of the respondents and dropped the proceedings .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHotline Cpt Ltd. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2003
Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC669
..... electronics had provided the technology only for 20 and 21 picture tubes that at no time the appellant went into production of 14 picture tubes and that the consideration paid was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurindra Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-08-2003
Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC673
..... site were carried out by the appellants to the entire satisfaction of pseb within stipulated time that the appellants were main contractors of pseb as they were to provide entire system .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial