Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the uttarakhand the uttar pradesh nagar nigam adhiniyam 1959 adaptation and modification order 2002 amendment act 2007 Page 1 of about 719 results (0.514 seconds)

Omprakash Verma and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 1) these appeals are directed against a common judgment and final order dated 17.01.2007 passed by the high court of judicature, andhra pradesh at hyderabad in writ petition nos. ..... (vi) once leave to appeal has been granted and appellate jurisdiction of supreme court has been invoked the order passed in appeal would attract the doctrine of merger; the order may be of reversal, modification or merely affirmation. ..... the act came into force in the state of uttar pradesh on 17-2-1976. ..... apparao and another (2002) 4 scc 638, this court held thus:"a judgment of the high court which refused to follow the decision and directions of the supreme court or seeks to revive a decision of the high court which has been set aside by the supreme court is a nullity. ..... 391 ma, dated 23.06.1980, the master plan as on 17.02.1976 was amended and the land in survey no. ..... jal nigam, lucknow v. .....

Maa Vind Vasini Industries (a Partnership Concern Registered Under the ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC1002

..... he lastly contended that uperc specifically adviced the state government to modify government order dated 14.06.2006 so that further action may be taken but admittedly, no order was passed by the state government amending government order dated 14.06.2006 in the financial year 2006-07 and, therefore, the chief engineer (commercial), uppcl has acted wholly without jurisdiction by writing letter dated 24.02.2007 directing the authorities of respondent no. ..... in the state of uttar pradesh, generation, distribution and transmission of electrical energy initially, and in particular after 1975, was solely in the hands of the u.p. ..... (5) the commission shall, within ninety days from the date on which the licensee has furnished the information under sub-section (4), give notice to the licensee that it-(a) accepts the licensee's calculation; or(b) does not consider the licensee's calculations to be in accordance with the procedure given in the license or considers that it is otherwise incorrect, specifying the reasons therefor and proposing modifications or alternative ..... corporation limited (hereinafter after referred to as the 'uppcl'), paschimanchal vidyut vitran nigam limited (meerut discom)(in short 'pwnl'), madhyanchal vidyut vitran nigam limited (lucknow discom)(in short mvvnl), dakshinanchal vidyut vitran nigam limited (agra discom)(in short 'dvvnl') and purvanchal vidyut vitran nigam limited (varanasi discom)(in short the 'supplier') by its order dated 10.11.2004. ..... : [2002]2scr661 ; .....

Susan Joy Taylor Vs. the Owners âandeuro;andldquo; Strata Plan No 115 ...

Court : Australia High Court

..... set aside orders 3 and 4 of the court of appeal of the supreme court of new south wales made on 18 march 2013, and orders 1 and 2 of that court made on 5 june 2013, and, in their place, order that: (a) the appeal be allowed; (b) the orders of the supreme court of new south wales made on 27 july 2012 be set aside and, in their place, order that: (i) the separate question: "insofar as the plaintiffs claim damages pursuant to ss 3 and 4 of the compensation to relatives act 1897, is any award of damages limited by the operation of s 12(2) of the civil liability act 2002? ..... the civil liability amendment (personal responsibility) act 2002 (nsw) effected extensive amendments to the liability act, inserting parts dealing with negligence, mental harm, proportionate liability, the liability of public and other authorities, intoxication, self-defence and recovery by criminals, good samaritans, volunteers, and apologies. ..... his honour said that the modification "must be consistent with the wording otherwise adopted by the draftsman"[48]. ..... [64](2007) 232 clr 138; [2007] hca 47. .....

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Pawan Kumar Divedi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... while noticing the provisions of uttar pradesh high schools and intermediate colleges (payment of salaries of teachers and other employees) act, 1971 (for short the 1971 act ), uttar pradesh basic education act, 1972 (for short the 1972 act ), uttar pradesh recognised basic schools (recruitment and conditions of service of teachers and other conditions) rules, 1975 (for short the 1975 rules ), uttar pradesh junior high schools (payment of salaries of teachers and other employees) act, 1978 (for short the 1978 act ), uttar pradesh recognised basic schools (junior high schools) (recruitment and conditions ..... effect to the provisions of this act or by reason of anything contained in this act, the state government may as occasion requires, by notification make such incidental or consequential provisions including provisions for adapting or modifying any provision of this act or of the uttar pradesh basic education act, 1972, or the rules made thereunder, but not affecting the substance, as it may think necessary or expedient for the purposes of this act. ..... insertion of article 21-a in the constitution by 86th amendment act, 2002 which received the assent on 12.12.2002, this court in unnikrishnan3 observed that the children up to the age of 14 years have ..... is a fundamental right) and the scheme framed thereunder require reconsideration/modification and if yes, what?. ..... the order of 10.10.2007 is as under : these appeals have been placed before us on reference order dated 8/9/2006 ..... nagar ..... 1959 .....

Noida Software Technology Park Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Information and Br ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... be true that having regard to the power of a statutory authority and in particular the government of india as a licensor, the matter requires the recommendation so far as the introduction of new terms and conditions of the licence to a service provider is concerned, which would include an amendment or modification, but the same not being the same that as the trai will have jurisdiction to recommend to the central government in the matter of issuance of guidelines under the indian telegraph act so as to enable it to do something, which is the sole prerogative of the licensor and not the central government under proviso appended to section 4 of the indian telegraph act. 92. ..... it had applied for and was granted a licence by the ministry of information and broadcasting purported to be under section 4 of the indian telegraph act, 1885 (the act) to establish, maintain and operate an uplinking hub (teleport) at plot no.b-23-25, pocket-c, surajpur industrial area, greater noida in the state of uttar pradesh on or about 24.01.2003 for a period of 10 years. 5. ..... whether a policy frame work submitted by the trai, by reason of its recommendations dated 17.10.2007, would be a regulation within the meaning of the provisions of the trai act, 1997 or the 1995 act, as amended in the year 2002, is the question. 58. .....

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... 1959, shall consist of the following members namely- (a) a chairman to be appointed by the state government; (b) a vice-chairman to be appointed by the state government; (c) the secretary to the state government, in charge of the department in which, for the time being, the business relating, to the development authorities is transferred, ex-officio; (d) the secretary to the state government in charge of the department of finance, ex-officio; (e) the chief town and country planner, uttar pradesh, ex-officio; (f) the managing director of the jal nigam, established under the uttar pradesh water supply and sewerage act ..... and lastly published by giving public notice on dated april 18,2008 the governor is pleased to declare under section 6 of the said act that he is satisfied that the land mentioned in the schedule below is needed for a public purpose, namely planned industrial development in district gautam budh nagar through greater noida industrial development authority and under section 7of the said act direct the collector of gautam budh nagar to take order for the acquisition of the ..... 7.9.2006 31.8.2007 17.11.2007 may 2008 to october 2008 82% 91% 5.8.2011 itehara 31.8.2007 4.7.2008 27.8.2008 and 16.9.2010 august 2008 to january 2010 72.45% 84.79% 25.7.2011 luksar 11.7.2008 29.1.2009 9.3.2009 may 2009 to june 2011 82.98% 87% 27.8.2011 badhpura 20.10.2001 3.12.2001 16.3.2002 nott received compensation 31.3.2009 raipurbangar 30.6.2006 16.1.2007 15.3.2007 november 2007 to august .....

The State of Bihar Vs. The Bihar Secondary Teachers Struggle Committee ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... these developments indicate that though the constitutional amendment act was passed in the year 2002, period of almost 8 years was given to the states to gear themselves up and cope up with the obligations which were to be discharged in terms of article 21a read with the provisions of rte act. ..... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 puducherry punjab rajasthan sikkim tamil nadu telangana tripura uttar pradesh uttarakhand west bengal total fund required .98 147.04 131.68 0 0 0 103.31 8448.78 67.74 2316 36998.00 31. ..... in order to alleviate the fiscal constraints of these states we recommend a grant amounting to the difference between the average amount contributed by each state in the years 2007-08 and 2008- 09 and the amount they need to contribute (on the basis of a 10 per cent share) in each of the five years of the award period, subject to a minimum of rs.5 crore per year. ..... niyojit teacher district cadre head respective panchayat, block, nagar panchayat, nagar parishad, nagar nigam or zila parishad, as the case may be. ..... as mentioned earlier, the respondents were employed/engaged by the official liquidators pursuant to the sanction accorded by the court under rule 308 of the 1959 rules and they are paid salaries and allowances from the company fund. .....

Kamal Jora and Another Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another

Court : Uttaranchal

..... this is the second round of litigation, between the parties as earlier the petitioners had challenged the order dated 20.5.2011 by which these two municipalities were dissolved by the government invoking its powers under article 243 q and 243 u of the constitution of india read with section 8-aa of the uttar pradesh municipal corporation act, 1959. ..... the third and the highest level of a municipality is for a larger urban area and is called a municipal corporation which is known in the state of uttarakhand as a nagar nigam. ..... in the circumstances, the conclusion would be that the opinion, referred to in section 8-aa of the said adhiniyam, cannot be given without hearing, nor the same can be treated as fait accompli, that hearing would become a mere formality. ..... (2) no amendment of any law for the time being in force shall have the effect of causing dissolution of a municipality at any level, which is functioning immediately before such amendment, till the expiration of its duration specified in clause (1). .....

Jagdish Prasad Sharma Etc.Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the other grounds taken as far as the patna cases are concerned, is in regard to the interpretation of section 64(a) of the patna university act, 1976, introduced by the amendment act of 2006, and section 67(a) of the bihar state universities act, 1976, introduced by the bihar state universities (amendment) act ..... the states of west bengal, uttar pradesh, haryana, punjab and madhya pradesh implemented the scheme without waiting for the ugc regulations, which were framed only on 30.6.2010, whereas the said scheme was implemented by the aforesaid states long before the ..... the fourth and the most important condition stipulated by the commission was that payment of central assistance for implementing the scheme was subject to the conditions that the entire scheme of revision of pay scales, together with all the conditions to be laid down by the ugc, by way of regulations and other guidelines, would have to be implemented by the state government and universities and colleges coming under their jurisdiction, as a composite scheme, emphasis supplied, without any modification except in regard to the date of implementation and ..... provides that in order to meet the situation arising out of shortage of teachers and also to attract people to the teaching profession, it had been decided to retain the services of teachers till the age of 65 years, as already intimated to all universities and colleges by the letter dated 23.3.2007, issued by the department of higher education, in the ministry of human .....

Amish Devgan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the writ petitioner, amish devgan, is a journalist who, it is stated, is presently the managing director of several news channels owned and operated by tv18 broadcast limited, including news18 uttar pradesh/uttarakhand, news18 madhya pradesh/ chhattisgarh and news18 rajasthan.3. ..... . ruling that the right to free speech is not absolute as article 19(2) of the constitution envisages reasonable restrictions, writ petition (criminal) no.160 of 2020 page 44 of 128 this court observed that the phrase public order , as a ground for restricting the freedom of speech, incorporated in article 19(2) vide the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951 with retrospective effect, reads in the interest of public order , which connotes a much wider import than maintenance of public order ..... , sector-20, gautam buddh nagar (uttar pradesh) 1 the places of worship (special provisions) act, 1991. ..... 12 (1970) 2 scc78013 air1962sc95514 1971 crl.l.j.1773 15 (2014) 2 scc116 (2017) 7 scc76017 (2007) 5 scc118 air1926calcutta 1133 19 (2014) 11 scc47720 ilr (1898) 22 bombay 112 21 [1992]. ..... . 1523 2002-2003 writ petition (criminal) no.160 of 2020 page 75 of 128 would be mere indifference, meet correction/criticism by peers, or sometimes negligible to warrant attention and hold that they were likely to incite or had attempted to promote hatred, enmity etc ..... . 1523 2002-2003 writ petition (criminal) no.160 of 2020 page 33 of 128 exacerbate the other s humiliation and denial of self-respect and autonomy .....