Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the sreepadam lands enfranchisement act 1969 Page 1 of about 98 results (0.086 seconds)

Nov 18 1987 (HC)

Sreepadam (Huf) Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1988)72CTR(Ker)52; [1988]172ITR471(Ker)

..... the assessee is the sreepadam palace whose lands were enfranchised, on payment of compensation, under the sreepadam lands enfranchisement act, 1969 (act 20 of 1969) ..... 15,537 being the moiety of the annuity fixed under the provisions of the sreepadam land enfranshisement act 20 of 1969 was liable to be taxed as revenue receipt '2 ..... the sreepadam lands are denned under the act as lands comprised in certain areas of the chirayinkil taluk, the revenue from which had been wholly assigned in favour of the sreepadam palace, as well as certain other lands owned by the sreepadam palace ..... --(1) the government shall, by way of compensation for the extinguishment of the right, title and interest of the sreepadam palace under clause (a) of section 3 and for the vesting in the government of the sreepadam lands held on kuthakapattam, under clause (b) of that section, pay in perpetuity to the sreepadampalace every financial year beginning with the financial year in which the appointed day falls, an amount of rs ..... payment is byway of compensation for extinguishment of right, title and interest of the sreepadam palace over certain lands falling under section 3(a) and for the vesting in the government of the sreepadam palace lands held on kuthakapattam and referred to in section 3(b). ..... some of the lands owned by the sreepadam palace were tharissu which are referred to in section 2(j) and in respect of which compensation was payable under the act in a lump sum bearing interest at the rate of 5 per cent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 1991 (SC)

Revathinnal Balagopala Varma Vs. His Highness Shri Padmanabhadasa Bala ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1991(5)SC301; 1991(2)SCALE1142; 1993Supp(233)SCC1; [1991]Supp3SCR30

..... describe the extent of the properties held by the sreepadom and states:the lands and other immovable properties mentioned in the schedule attached hereto have been inherited, held and enjoyed by our family, the aforesaid sreepadom palace, as sreepadom palace private properties and the family continues to have exclusive, absolute and undisputed title of ownership, possession and enjoyment by the laws of inheritance, custom, proprietorship and tradition.the sreepadom lands, enfranchised as aforesaid, as well as the private family properties, more particularly described in ..... this act had not been passed dies after the commencement of this act, having at the time of his or her death an interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi or illom, as the case may be, his or her interest in the intestate succession, as the case may be, under this act and not according to the marumakkattayam or nambudri law.explanation:- for the purposes of this sub-section, the interest of a hindu in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi or illom shall be deemed to be the share in the property of the tarwad, tavazhi or illom, as ..... that defendants 3 and 12 who were the two senior female members in the family and were junior and senior maharanis of travancore respectively along with their descendants formed a tarwad known as sreepadam (the tarwad set up by the appellant in his plaint was, according to ..... nos. 1358-1359 of 1969 were filed in this court against the aforesaid judgment of the gujarat high court which were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1975 (SC)

Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Shri Raj NaraIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC2299; 1975(Supp)SCC1; [1976]2SCR347

..... the 29th amendment act inserted in the ninth schedule to the constitution entries 65 and 66 being the kerala land reforms act, 1969 and the kerala land reforms act, 1971. ..... retrospectively. it was held that act 5 of 1969 had removed the disqualification retrospectively, that parliament and the state legislatures can legislate retrospectively subject to the provisions of the constitution, that no limitation on the powers of the legislature, to make a declaration validating an election could be put, and that, by enacting the impugned act, the disqualification if any which existed in the 1951 act had been removed. ..... abetting or attempting to obtain or procure by & candidate or his agent or by any person the consent of a candidate or the ejection agent any assistance (other than the giving of vote) for the furtherance of the prospects of the candidate's election from any person in the service of the government and belonging to any of the classes specified therein, it is, in my opinion, essential that at the time the impugned act, namely, the obtaining or procuring or abetting or attempting to obtain or procure the assistance of a government servant is done, the person doing the act must be a candidate or his agent or any other person ..... chattels. and, even in the united states of america, there was a republic even before the negroes were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1990 (SC)

Pollisetti Pullamma and Others Vs. Kalluri Kameswaramma and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC604; JT1990(4)SC293; 1990(2)SCALE883; [1990]Supp2SCR393

..... on the main questions the concurrent findings of the courts below were that the village was an 'estate' under section 3(2)(d) of the madras estates land act as amended in 1936, that the plaint temple owned the melvaram and kudivaram interests in the lands; that the lands were private lands as defined by the madras estates land act; that the defendants had acquired no occupancy rights in the lands either under the act or by prescription and that the suits were properly laid in the civil court which had undoubted jurisdiction to try the suits. ..... a statutory enfranchisement must have effect, however, in accordance with the terms of the statute, and where the statute preserves rights notwithstanding the enfranchisement and the extent of the rights so preserved depended upon custom, the custom remains relevant to define the rights preserved by the statute.31. ..... 616 of 1969 which was dismissed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1993 (HC)

Syed Bhasheer Ahamed and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant227; ILR1994KAR159; 1994(1)KarLJ385

..... be liable to pay land revenue to the slate government from the appointed date in accordance with the provisions of the code and the rules and orders made thereunder; and all the provisions of the code and the rules and orders relating to unalienated land or ryotwari land shall, subject to the provisions of this act, apply to the said land: provided that in respect of land which was not assigned under an existing law relating to the village office as the remuneration of the village office, an occupancy price equal to the amount of the full assessment of such land in the case of holders ..... . (vii) and the decisions in harkun's case) note: the only exception to the 15 year bar being re-grants to the holders of a village office in an enfranchised inam (that is an inam of which there is proof of enfranchisement as required under the madras enfranchisedinams act, 1862) which could be transferred in the manner provided in the proviso to s ..... . in hanumaiah's case the alienations were in the years 1967, 1968 and 1969, that is, after 1-2-1963 and before 7-8-1978 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

B.R. Vasudevamurthy S/O. H.D. Ramaswamy and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Hon

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007(1)KAR1034; 2007(2)KCCRSN97; 2007(3)AIRKarR71(DB)

..... respect of the lands in question is recognised under section 9 of the act and the state government has retained its statutory power under section 10 of the inams abolition act for grant of occupancy rights in favour of the inamdars, therefore the intention of the legislature under the provisions of sections 7 and 9 the rights of the inamdars even after abolition of inams under the act are intact and therefore the same should not have been meddled with by the state government and spl.d.c, this position of law is well settled in the decision of the apex court reported in : [ ..... state are only those interests not coming within section 6.in view of the above legal position, absence of a direction to be issued to the inamdars for payment of premium of the lands in question after determining their rights and the order passed by the land tribunal to register them as occupants in respect of the lands in question cannot be found fault with by this court, the procedural lapse on the part of the land tribunal shall not supersede the legal rights of the inamdars in respect of the lands in question under the provision of the inams abolition act, in support of this legal contention ..... . for enfranchised inam, no premium is imposed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 1999 (HC)

Thressiamma Jacob Vs. Geologist, District Office of the Dept. of Minin ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2000Ker300

..... the first head is the estates held on sanads of permanent settlement, second is the enfranchised inam lands and the third is the religious service tenements conferred under the inam rules on perpetual service tenure and the fourth is the lands held on title-deeds, issued under the waste land rules, prior to 7th october 1870, in which no reservation of the rights of the state to minerals is made.26. ..... the learned judge noted that as long as the share of the sovereign was being paid, the sovereign had no right to the possession of the lands, and the proprietorship of these lands was vested in the occupier, who could not be removed because another offered more'.learned counsel submitted that in the act, it is clearly stated that what is being given to the government for working out the minerals is 'rajabhagam' and hence it is right to contend that the minerals belong to the owners. ..... in that case, the validity of gudalur jenmom estates (abolition and conversion into ryotwari) act 1969 was challenged on the ground of violation of articles 14, 19, 31 and 31a of the constitution of india. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2010 (HC)

J. Saraswathy Amm Vs. N. Sreedharan Nair and ors.

Court : Kerala

..... hamsa haji : air 1987 sc 1326 the apex court interpreting section 7d of the kerala land reforms act, 1963 which stipulated that any person in occupation at the commencement of the kerala land reforms (amendment) act, 1969, of the land of another situate in malabar, to which the provisions of the madras preservation of private forests act, 1949 (xxvii of 1949), were applicable on the 11th day of april, 1955 or which was unsurveyed on that date shall be deemed to be a tenant if he or his predecessor-in-interest was continuously in occupation of such land for not less than two years ..... while matters stood thus, the state legislature enacted the kerala service inam lands (vesting and enfranchisement) act, 1981 and it came into force with effect from 6.8.1981. ..... after the kerala service inam lands (vesting and enfranchisement) act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' for short) came into force, the petitioner filed o.a. no. ..... this was not sanctioned since the bill for enfranchisement of uzhiyam services was introduced in the assembly on 31.7.1980 and was referred to the select committee the same day. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1971 (HC)

K. Gopalachari Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1972Mad365

..... act 23 of 1969 on the following grounds: (1) the pudukottai inam estate having vested in the government, on enfranchisement it was no longer an estate on 16-2-1963. ..... under the said pudukottai inam rules, inams were converted into assessed lands on enfranchisement and permanent pattas were issued in respect of such lands. ..... the principal contentions put forward on behalf of the government are: the enfranchisement under the pudukottai inam rules, 1888 cannot take away the inam character of the lands as it is only subject to the concession still attached to the grant which is not completely extinguished. ..... section 3 provides that all lands held on inam tenure at the commencement of the act in the merged territory of pudukottai shall be settled in accordance with the principles laid down in the rules and orders contained in the standing orders of the board of revenue for the time being applicable to the settlement of inams in the rest of the madras state. ..... when madras act 26 of 1963 as modified by the impugned act is inapplicable to such lands (2) in the guise of an amendment the impugned law really takes away the benefit which already accrued to the petitioner under madras act 30 of 1963 and it is thus a legislative device to deprive the inamdar of his right to get a patta under madras act 30 of 1963 and the impugned law is a piece of colourable legislation offending the petitioner's fundamental rights under arts. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 1985 (HC)

Pentapati Chitti Mahalakshmi Vs. Gannavarapu Subba Rap and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986AP52

..... of descent and consequently somamma the widow of bhimanna the last male holder of the office became entitled to the said office and in view of the andhra pradesh (andhra area) proprietary estates' village service and the andhra pradesh (andhra area) hereditary village offices laws (repeal) act 16 of 1969 which came into force on 22-5-1969 the office ceased to be hereditary and somamma died on 16-12-1969 and under those circumstances the parties must work out their rights under the provisions of the andhra pradesh inams abolition ..... it is two parts (1) the effect of andhra pradesh (andhra area) inams abolition act 37 of 1956 on service inams (2) the effect of andhra pradesh (andhra area) proprietary estates' village service and the andhra pradesh (andhra area) hereditary village offices laws (repeal) act 16 of 1969 on service inam lands.22. ..... hence when a karnam service lands were enfranchised and a quit-rent was imposed in lieu of the service, and an inam title-deed was granted confirming the lands to the holder of the office, it was held that the lands were his separate property, and were not subject to nay claim to partition by other members of the family. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //