Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the sikkim ceiling on government guarantees act 2000 Page 1 of about 14,108 results (0.376 seconds)

Jan 12 2016 (HC)

Yagna Moorthi Vs. The Assistant Commissioner and The Competent Authori ...

Court : Chennai

..... efficacy during the year 1999 on account of passing of the tamil nadu urban land (ceiling and regulation) repeal act 1999 by virtue of which under section 4 of the act all the lands which are under proceedings under the said act became free hold land much less all the proceedings pending before the courts, tribunal or other authority stands abated but to the exception of lands possessed by the government in which case if the state government had taken possession of the lands, the same gets saved by virtue of section 3(1)(a) of the said act is declining ..... / refusing to include his name in the town survey register ..... the petitioner has submitted that the proposition laid in air 2000 supreme court 3415 (pandit madhan swaroop shortiya public charitable trust vs. ..... the state of uttarpradesh and others and the proposition laid down by the hon'ble apex court in j.t.2000 (suppl.1) sc 295 - supreme court - in smt.angoori devi vs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2000 (HC)

Anne Ramachandra Rao Vs. Government of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD377; 2000(4)ALT179

..... ' it is obvious that the undue hardship must be a direct consequence of the application of the provisions in chapter iii which provides for the restriction on the entitlement to hold any vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit prescribed and further prohibits the transfer of the excess vacant land which vests in the state government in the manner provided in section 10 and the owner is entitled only to the amount specified in section 11 of the act. ..... is being or is proposed to be used and such other relevant factor as the circumstances of the case may require, it is necessary or expedient in the public interest so to do, that government may, by order, exempt subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the order, such vacant land from the provisions of this chapter; (b) where any person holds vacant land in the excess of the ceiling limit and the state government, either on its own motion or otherwise, is satisfied that the application of the provisions of this chapter would cause undue hardship to such ..... are satisfied in a given case, would be inconsistent with the scheme of the act as enunciated by the decisions of the supreme court in 2000 (2) ald 48 (sc) and : air1996sc2553 (supra).8. ..... rao, 2000 (2) ald 48 (sc), contended that in view of g.o. ms. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2008 (TRI)

In Re: Central Park Farm and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

..... developers private limited, ("the company") have invoked the equitable jurisdiction of the company law board under sections 397, 398, 402, 403 & 406 of the companies act ("the act") to remedy their grievances on account of certain alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the company at the hands of the respondents, as under: (a) to declare that the third respondent has no authority to represent as a director of the company and execute the sale deeds in favour of the respondents 7 & 8; (b) to declare that the sale of the properties of the company under two sale ..... deeds dated 28.04.2005 by the third respondent in favour of the respondents 7 and 8 are null and void and ..... the respondents 2 to 6 without filing any balance sheet after the period ended 31.03.2000 have stealthily taken steps under section 560 for striking off the name of the company as per the simplified exit scheme of the central government, without the knowledge of the petitioners and without disclosing the dues payable to government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2004 (SC)

Escorts Farms Ltd., Previously Known as Escorts Farms (Ramgarh) Ltd. V ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC2186; JT2004(2)SC481; 2004(2)SCALE607; (2004)4SCC281

..... where any tenure holder holds any land on or after the commencement of the uttar pradesh imposition of ceiling on land holdings (amendment) act 1972, in excess of the ceiling area applicable to him, he shall be liable to pay to the state government for the period commencing from the first day of july 1973, until the date on which the collector takes possession of such surplus land under section 14, or the date in which the tenure holder voluntarily delivers possession to the collector under the said sub-section, whichever is earlier, such compensation for ..... thus conjointly reading the provisions of the ceiling act and the land reforms act, the grantee of land from the government is a holder of land in the status of a bhumidhar and the land can be subjected to ceiling limit. ..... the statements of objects and reasons read thus:'provisions of section 2 of the government grants (up amendment) act, 1959, have the effect of saving a grant of an agricultural lease by or on behalf of the government from the operation not only on the acts mentioned therein, but also of any other law, including the law for imposition of ceiling on land holdings, that might be made in future. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2018 (HC)

Federation of Okhla Industrial Association (Regd.) vs.lt Governor of D ...

Court : Delhi

..... of functions in the union territory of delhi under the minimum wages act, 1948 (11 of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as the said act), the president hereby directs that the administrator of the union territory of delhi, shall, subject to the control of the president and until further orders, wp(c) 5217/2017 & connected matters page 23 of 218 (i) (ii) exercise the powers and discharge the functions of a state government in relation to any scheduled employment in the said union territory, for which the appropriate government is the state government in terms of the sub-clause (ii) of clause (b) of section 2 of the said act, discharge of the central government in so far ..... the court was considering a challenge made to a notification dated 19th april, 1955 issued by the government of bombay in exercise of authority vested under the minimum wages act, 1948 on the ground that it was ultra vires, void and illegal because the minimum wages act and the notification infringe the guarantee of equal protection of the laws and affected the rights of the appellants to carry on their business. ..... .50 8541.78 10697.96 6949.02 7885.80 5868.00 6301.88 8810.00 8710.00 6500.00 7982.00 7389.20 7389.20 state uttar pradesh uttarakhand jammu & kashmir assam west bengal jharkhand manipur meghalaya mizoram nagaland odisha arunachal pradesh bihar sikkim tripura rajasthan punjab haryana h.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2003 (HC)

H.E.T.C. Educational Society Represented by Its Director - Projects Dr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ568

..... besides the reasons given in the impugned order, and the further reason given in the additional affidavit, violation of the land ceiling laws by the petitioner in holding more land than is permissible under the tamil nadu land reforms (fixation of ceiling on land) act, 1961 without obtaining an order of exemption from the state government, was also put forth as a justification for not granting the essentiality certificate. ..... shri rajagopalan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the state as also the university have misconceived their role in the scheme governing establishment of new dental colleges under the dentists act, have usurped the function of the dental council, and of the central government, that they have declined the certificates sought on irrelevant grounds, and therefore their orders are unsustainable. ..... secretary to government higher education department (2000) 5 scc 221, it is now settled law that in the matter of grant of permission for establishing new colleges for the disciplines which are governed by all india council of technical education act, indian medical council act and dentists act, those central statutes occupy the field as those central laws are relatable to entry 66 of list i and entry 25 of list ii. ..... the failure to furnish the bank guarantee before the government of india was also cited as a reason. 7. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1955 (SC)

Maharaj Umeg Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bombay and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1955SC540; (1955)57BOMLR709; [1955]2SCR164

..... before the commencement of the constitution by the rulers of the respective states and to which the government of dominion of india was a party and that therefore this court had no jurisdiction to interfere in the said disputes by virtue of the provisions of article 363 of the constitution, that the state legislature had plenary powers of legislation within the ambit of its sphere unless the constitution itself expressly prohibited legislation on the subject either absolutely or conditionally, that no such prohibition could be spelt out of the terms of clause 5 of the letters of guarantee and that the impugned act ..... once the topic of legislation was comprised within any of the entries in the lists ii & iii of the seventh schedule to the constitution the fetter or limitation on such legislative power had to be found within the constitution itself and if there was no such fetter or limitation to be found there the state legislature had full competence to enact the impugned act no matter whether such enactment was contrary to the guarantee given, or the obligation undertaken by the dominion government or the province of bombay or even the state of bombay. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1962 (SC)

Parmanand and ors. Vs. Ganpatrao and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1963MHLJ278(SC); [1963]Supp(1)SCR28

..... section 124 confers power on the state government to regulate payment of sums payable under the act and provides for the number and amount of the instalments, and the time, place and manner of payment of any sum payable under a settlement or sub-settlement, or otherwise under an assessment made under this act. ..... 33 provides that no sale for arrears of revenue shall be annulled, except upon the ground of its having been made contrary to the provisions of this act, and then only on proof that the plaintiff has sustained substantial injury by reason of the irregularity complained of; with the rest of the section we are not concerned. ..... justifies a claim for annulling the sale only if two conditions are satisfied; that the sale should have been made contrary to the provisions of the act and that the plaintiff must show that he has sustained substantial injury by reason of the irregularity complained of. ..... 149(2) it is relevant to remember that the provision in question is made in relation to revenue sales and there is no doubt that the revenue sales are authorised to be held under the summary procedure prescribed by the relevant sections of the act, and so, it would not be unreasonable to construe these provisions ..... section 128 provides for the process for recovery of an arrear and it prescribes that an arrear payable to government may be recovered, inter alia ..... 124 requires that unless the state government otherwise directs, all such payments shall be made as prescribed under sub-s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2013 (HC)

Cr.W.P. 1922 of 2012 Vs. Unknown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... prisoner on parole is an administrative function governed by the relevant provisions of act and rules and the administration is under a duty to bear in mind certain cardinal and guiding factors but the releasing authority exercising the discretion is required to follow the rules and procedure governing the temporary release on parole keeping in mind that the provisions of parole are intended to subserve and not to subrogate the substantive provisions. ..... if the existence of the purpose is established and the conditions of the discretion are fulfilled, the competent authority will be under an obligation to exercise the discretion in furtherance of such purpose (see : in re : kerala education bill, 1958, air 195.supreme court 956 at page 975).the exercise of power of releasing a prisoner on parole or furlough must not, therefore, be looked upon as an act of charity, compassion or clemency but as an act in the discharge of a legal duty required to be performed upon the fulfilment of the prescribed conditions to effectuate a salutary purpose....7. a key to the scheme of the act is ..... 6 places an embargo upon such release under section 3 or section 4 where on the report of the district magistrate, the state government, or its delegate is satisfied that the release of the prisoner was likely to endanger the security of the state or the maintenance of public order. ..... whether inside prison or outside, a person is not deprived of his guaranteed freedoms save by methods right, just and fair. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2013 (HC)

Jagannath S/O Anna Khakare and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Th ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... in para 36 of the judgment, the supreme court has observed that: 36 the principle laid down in the aforementioned cases (in ajay hasias case) that if the government acting through its officers was subject to certain constitutional limitations, a fortiori the government acting through the instrumentality or agency of a corporation should equally be subject to the same limitations, was approved by the constitution bench and it was pointed out that otherwise it would lead to considerable erosion of the efficiency of the fundamental rights, for in that event the government would be enabled to override the fundamental rights by adopting the stratagem ..... of carrying out its function through the instrumentality or agency of a corporation while retaining .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //