Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the salesette estates land revenue exemption abolition rules 1952 Page 1 of about 1,075 results (0.248 seconds)

Jul 08 2011 (HC)

Mr. Shrikant Keshavrao Rakvi and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... subsequently in proceeding under the salesette estate (land revenue exemptions and abolition) act 1951, an order dated 28/1/1989 was passed by the resident deputy collector, thane and subsequently the revenue minister of government of maharashtra, passed an order dated 28/4/2008 directing that an enquiry under section 3 of the aforesaid act should be completed. ..... assessment) rules, 1969 and the provisions of other relevant statutes/rules.the district collector, thane is also directed to apply his mind and consider the provisions of section 33 of the bombay stamp act, 1958 qua the aforesaid deeds of release dated 24/8/2009 and 15/1/2011 and take appropriate steps in accordance with law in that regard and submit a compliance report to the divisional commissioner and the state government. ..... by consent rule made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up on board for hearing. ..... the respective counsels for respondents waive service of rule.2. ..... (c) rule made absolute in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. ..... rule. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2011 (HC)

Smt. Bhanumati Harishchandra Bujad Vs. the State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

..... subsequently in proceeding under the salesette estate (land revenue exemptions and abolition) act 1951, an order dated 28/1/1989 was passed by the resident deputy collector, thane and subsequently the revenue minister of government of maharashtra, passed an order dated 28/4/2008 directing that an enquiry under section 3 of the aforesaid act should be completed. ..... in case an order adverse to the petitioner was to be passed, the petitioner would have an alternate remedy of filing an appeal under section 247 of the maharashtra land revenue code, 1966 before the concerned revenue officer; since the application filed by the petitioner has not been entertained only on the ground of pendency of aforesaid 3 petitions in this court and the interim orders passed therein and since the question involved is in respect of the interpretation of the said interim orders, we have thought it fit not to relegate the petitioner to avail of such an alternate ..... the respective counsels for respondents waive service of rule.2. ..... by consent rule made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up on board for hearing. ..... (f) rule made absolute in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. ..... rule. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1986 (SC)

Jayantrao Amratrao Pradhan Vs. Parthasarthy, Collector of Kaira Distri ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC2153; 1986(1)SCALE644; (1986)3SCC507; [1986]2SCR1; 1986(2)LC353(SC)

..... -in the adjudication of claims to exempt lands or interests therein, the titles of claimants shall be determined by the rules in schedule b annexed to this act.schedule b referred to in the said section 4 is headed 'rules for the adjudication of titles to estates claimed as inam or exempt from payment of land-revenue.6. ..... the first point urged at the hearing of this appeal was that the original grant was not a grant of the soil but of the revenue of the land and, therefore, the said lands were not liable to be resumed either under the abolition act or under the resumption rules, 1908. ..... (3) the decision of the collector, subject to an appeal under sub-section (2), and the decision of the state government in appeal under sub-section (2) shall be final.the abolition act also contains provisions for re-grant of watan land either to the holder of the watan or to authorized holders and it also provides that if any watan land has been lawfully leased and such lease was subsisting on the date of the coming into force of the abolition act, the provisions of the tenancy law would apply to the said lease.9. ..... under section 4 of the abolition act, patel watans were abolished, the office of patel was made non-hereditary and all watan lands were resumed and were to be subject to the payment of land revenue under the provisions of the relevant land revenue code and the rules made thereunder, as if such lands were unalienated land. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1992 (HC)

Amirchand Tulsiram Gupta and ors. Vs. Vasant Dhanaji Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR22; (1992)94BOMLR965

..... it is required to be stated that bhandup village was a khoti village and khoti rights were abolished and the estates were resumed under the salsette estates (land revenue exemptions) abolition act, 1951, which came into effect from march 1, 1952. ..... under the provisions of the act the land revenue exemption enjoyed by the khots was abolished. ..... on inquiry and after examining the evidence produced in support of the respective claims, it was held by the inquiry officer under the bombay land revenue code that the lands involved in the suit are owned by the plaintiff trustees and the trust has acquired title to the suit properties by two conveyances secured from keni and billimoria. ..... the plaintiffs were permitted to withdraw the suit without obtaining leave to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action and therefore, the present suit is barred by provisions of order xxiii, rule 1 of the code of civil procedure. ..... (d) the commissioner for accounts to hold an inquiry as regards the mesne profits from the date of the suit until delivery of possession to the plaintiffs in accordance with provisions of order xx, rule 12(1)(c) of the code of civil procedure. ..... the claim as regards mesne profits from the date of institution of the suit till recovery of possession is required to be determined in accordance with order xx rule 2(c) of the code of civil procedure. 18. ..... 5 claimed that he had engaged one rule advocate to take search of the record to find out the title of dhanaji patil. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1957 (HC)

Golden Tobacco Co. Private Ltd. Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1957Bom186; (1957)59BOMLR409; ILR1957Bom795

..... the collector held that consequent upon the introduction of the salsette estate (land revenue exemption abolition) act of 1951, the lands in ex-khot villages were liable to pay land revenue. ..... in 1950 the state legislature enacted the salsette estates (land revenue exemption abolition) act of 1951, and the lands became khalsa lands. ..... we are unable to find anv support in the scheme of the bombay revenue tribunal act for the submission implicit in the contention of the state that the jurisdiction of the state government under section 211 of the land revenue code is transferred to the revenue tribunal only in those cases where the citizen is aggrieved by the order of a revenue officer in a revenue case. 10. ..... it is urged that the jurisdiction to revise the order of the collector is vested in the bombay revenue tribunal constituted under bombay act 12 of 1939 and the state government is incompetent since the enactment of that act to exercise jurisdiction to revise the decisions of the collector in a revenue case, in exercise of powers under section 211 of the bombay land revenue code. 5. ..... for the period between 1-3-1952, and 31-7-1957, and called upon the petitioners to pay rs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1961 (HC)

Collector of Bombay Vs. Burjor Hormusji Poonegar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom7; (1963)65BOMLR191; ILR1963Bom715

..... two questions that had arisen for determination in that appeal were, firstly, whether the salsette estates (land revenue exemption abolition) act, 1951, was applicable to the plaintiffs' properties in the suit, and, secondly, if it was so applicable, whether the plaintiffs' case fell under section 3 (3) and thus entitled them to the exemption as provided in the said section. ..... on which the revenue is due or of such portion of any other property, moveable or immoveable, o the defaulter, as may be required to satisfy the demand.if the sale of the defaulter's property shall not produce satisfaction of the demand, it shall be lawful for the collector to cause him to be apprehended and confined in the civil jail under the rules in force at the presidency for the confinement of debtors, for which purpose a certificate of demand under the collector's signature sent with the defaulter shall be the sheriff's sufficient warrant, equally with the usual legal process in ordinary cases ..... he pointed out that the act of 1854 had been repealed in 1952 (sic) and that the said section 16 no longer applied to the conveyance of 15th march, 1938.27. ..... 74 of 1952 (collector of bombay v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1979 (HC)

Popatlal Gokuldas and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1980Bom140

..... he urged that no rules are framed under section 11 of the salsette estate (land revenue exemption abolition) act, 1951, with the result that the land revenue rules, 1921, are without authority of law. ..... (1) on all lands which are not wholly exempt from the payment of land revenue, and on which the assessment has not been fixed under the provisions of chapter viii-a, the assessment of the amount to be paid as land revenue shall, subject to rules made in this behalf under section 214, be fixed at the discretion of the collector, for such period not exceeding ninety-nine years as he may, be authorised to prescribe, and the amounts due according to such assessment shall be levied on all such lands: x x x x x (2) after the expiry of the period for which the assessment of any land is fixed ..... by the salsette estate (land revenue exemption abolition) act, 1951, which came into force from 1st march 1952, the proprietary rights of the khot of kurla were abolished and the lands belonging to private owners became, for the first time, liable to payment of land revenue to government. ..... deshpande urged that it was not permissible to levy the assessment retrospectively from 1st august 1952. mr. ..... 1952. mr. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1963 (SC)

Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC590; [1964]2SCR737

..... the legislature of the bombay state enacted thesalsette estates (land revenue exemption abolition) act, xlvii of 1951 (hereinaftercalled the act) which received the assent of the president on january 4, 1952and was brought into force on march 1, 1952. ..... (a) all lands in any estate areand shall be liable to the payment of land revenue to the state government inaccordance with the provisions of the code and the rules made thereunder;'7. ..... ' the indenture then proceeds to recitethat banajee had covenanted with the east india company that he, his heirs,successors, executors, administrators and assigns shall continue to pay thesaid rent reserved on the terms mentioned if demanded, continue devasthans,dharamadawas and allowance to pals and shall not make any innovations and shallconform to the rules, ordinances and regulations as existing and applicable tofarmers. ..... be deemed to affectthe right of any person to hold land in an estate wholly or partially exemptfrom the payment of land revenue under a special contract, or grant made orrecognized by the terms of the cowl in respect of the estate or under a law forthe time being in force in favour of any person other than the estate-holder.this clause only protects the rights of a person to hold land in an estateexempt from payment of land revenue, if such exemption is under a specialcontract or grant made or recognised by the terms of the cowl in respect of theestate or under a law for the time being in force, and a person whose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1959 (HC)

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. J.H. Katrak

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1259

..... on january 14, 1952, the bombay legislature passed the salsette estates (land revenue exemption abolition) act, 1951, being act xlvii of 1951 which abolished amongst other things the khoti tenure in salsette district. ..... rule 92 of the rules framed under the land revenue code provides:when land assessed for purposes of agriculture only is subsequently used for any purpose unconnected with agriculture, the assessment upon the land so used shall, tin-less otherwise directed by the state government, be altered under sub-section (2) of section 48 by the collector in accordance with rules 81 to 87 inclusive.the learned advocate general contended from this rule that this was one of the factors which rendered the right to levy assessment insecure, for government at any time can direct the collector ..... not to change the assessment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1996 (HC)

KamaruddIn N. Shaikh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR209; (1996)98BOMLR159

..... that entry is based upon the order dated 24th december, 1964 passed under section 37 of the land revenue code read with section 4 of the salsette estates (land revenue exemption abolition) act, 1951. ..... therefore, the special mamlatdar's order holding the land to be appropriated under section 4 of the salsette estate (land revenue exemption abolition) act, 1951 was justified on that count. ..... despite these documentary evidence on record, the revenue tribunal has arrived at the conclusion that the land was not a forest land by holding that :i) the notice dated 27th august, 1975 issued under section 35(3) of the indian forest act is invalid because :---(a) annexures 'e' and 'f' indicate that quarrying operations were carried on, on the land on the date when the act came in force;(b) no notice was given to the maharashtra land development corporation even though the document in favour of the corporation was executed on 29th march, 1975 and was lodged for ..... a preliminary administration decree dated 25th november, 1952 was passed and the receiver was authorised to sell by public auction all properties comprising the estate of the deceased haji alimahomed haji cassum.in the sale deed, the description of all the properties transferred is mentioned in the first and second schedule. ..... rule is discharged with no order as to costs.44. ..... rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.43. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //