Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab village common lands regulation amendment act 1995 Page 1 of about 9,204 results (0.862 seconds)

Puran Vs. Financial Commissioner (Appeals)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)112PLR523

..... -clause (ii-a) of clause (g) of section 2, all riots, title and interest of the panchayat in such land, as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1955, shall cease ..... deh under clause (g) of section 2 other than the land so excluded under sub-clause (ii-a) of that clause, all rights, title and interest of the panchayat in such land as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995, shall cease and all such rights, title and interest shall vest in the person or persons in whom they were vested, immediately before the commencement of the shamlat law;(ii) where any land has vested in a panchayat under this act, but such land has been excluded from shamilat deh under sub .....

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Gram Panchayat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC1365; JT2002(2)SC581; 2002(2)SCALE565; (2002)4SCC93; [2002]2SCR283

..... and interest of the panchayat in such land as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995, shall cease and all such rights, title and interest shall vest in the person or persons in whom they were vested, immediately before the commencement of the similar law;(ii) where any land has vested in a panchayat under this act, but such land has been excluded from shamilat deh under sub-clause (ii-a) of clause (g) of section 2, all rights, title and interest of the panchayat in such land, as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995 shall, cease, and ..... all such rights, title and interest shall on or before the 9th day of july, 1985, revest in the person or persons to whom the land so excluded has been allotted or otherwise transferred by sale or by any other manner whatsoever, subject to the condition that --(a) * * *(b) * * *shall be paid by the rehabilitation department of the government of punjab to the department of rural development and panchayats for onward disbursement .....

Mohinder Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)137PLR396

..... it is then pleaded that in the meanwhile, the village common lands act was amended by the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as 'the amended act of 1995'). ..... chopra, learned senior counsel representing the petitioners, in support of this petition contends that the village common lands act was amended by the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995. ..... mohinder singh and three others, through present petition filed by them under article 226 of the constitution of india, seek issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari so as to quash orders, annexure p3 and p4, dated 24.4.1998 and 9.11.2001, passed by the collector and commissioner, respectively, whereby the petitioners herein were ordered to be evicted in the proceedings initiated against them under section 7 of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1961'). ..... it is then pleaded that conflict regarding the custody, management and disposal of evacuee agricultural land in shamlat deh arose after the enactment of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1954 and 61. .....

Municipal Committee, Sirhind Vs. Parshotam Dass and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IIAD(SC)313; JT1996(2)SC504; 1996(2)SCALE351; (1996)8SCC324; [1996]2SCR678

..... they were vested, immediately before the commencement of the shamlat law; (ii) where any land has vested in a panchayat under this act, but such land has been excluded from shamlat deh under sub-clause (ii-a) of clause (g) of section 2, all rights, title and interest of the panchayat in such land, as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995, shall, cease ..... section 3(2) of punjab village common lands (regulations) act, 1961 is extracted hereinbelow in extenso:-(2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section 91) of section 4-(i) where any land has vested in a panchayat under the shamlat law, but such land has been excluded from shamlat deh under clause (g) of section 2 other than the land so excluded under sub-clause (ii-a) of that clause, all rights, title and interest of the panchayat in such land as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995, shall cease and all such rights, title and interest shall vest in the person or persons in whom .....

Gram Panchayat of Village Tulewal Vs. Joint Commissioner(ird) Punjab a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... [(2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section(1) of section 4,-- (i) where any land has vested in a panchayat under the shamilat law, but such land has been excluded from shamilat deh under clause (g) of section 2 other than the land so excluded under sub-clause (ii-a) of that clause, all rights, title and interest of the panchayat in such land as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995, shall cease and all such rights, title and interest shall vest in the person or persons in whom they were vested, immediately civil ..... writ petition no.18665 of 1998 -10- before the commencement of the shamilat law; (3) xx xx xx xx . .....

Gram Panchayat/Gram Sabha of Village Bhattian, Tehsil Vs. the State of ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... anything contained in sub- section(1) of section 4,-- (i) where any land has vested in a panchayat under the shamilat law, but such land has been excluded from shamilat deh under clause (g) of section 2 other than the land so excluded under sub-clause (ii-a) of that clause, all rights, title and interest of the panchayat in such land as from the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) amendment act, 1995, shall cease and all such rights, title and interest shall vest in the person or persons in whom they were vested, immediately before ..... to the effect that the plaintiff is in possession of the land in dispute and that leaving the question of title open, the defendant gram panchayat shall not evict the plaintiff by force and shall eject him only by proceedings under section 7 of the punjab village common lands (regulations) act, 1961 ..... the date of enforcement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961, and used, according to the revenue record, for common ..... the gram panchayat, filed a petition under section 7 of the punjab village common lands (regulations) act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ..... the decree is, even otherwise, null and void, as it was passed after section 13 of the punjab village common land (regulation) act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ..... on 9.1.1954, and not used for any common purpose, on the date of the coming into force of the pepsu village common lands (regulation) act, 1954, civil writ petition no.3193 o .....

Gram Panchayat, Village Kum Kalan Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008AIRSCW1950; JT2008(2)SC505; (2008)2MLJ1069(SC); (2008)151PLR443; 2008(2)SCALE380; (2008)4SCC253; 2008(2)ICC597; 2008(4)KCCRSN273.

..... on 08.05.1995, the state of punjab amended the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 thereby validating and legalizing the illegal and invalid allotment of land of the gram panchayat to the displaced persons with the intention of abrogating the judgment passed by this court in gram panchayat of village jamalpur v. ..... in this case, the state of punjab took the stand that by reason of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1953 as amended in 1961, the interest of the persons in the shamlat deh lands stood extinguished and the shamlat deh lands were fully placed in the control and power of the gram panchayat and in view of the above judgment, c.w.p. no. ..... 463 to tide over the effect of the judgment, an amendment was made in the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961, by amendment act no. ..... earlier the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1953 was amended by punjab act no. ..... 8 of 1995 was brought in the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 and concluding that the basis of the order canceling the allotment of savitri devi no longer subsists, dismissed the writ petition filed by the gram panchayat. ..... 8 of 1995 being ultra vires of the constitution of india and violative of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 as it has set at naught and abrogated the validity of the judgment passed by this court. .....

Jasbir Singh S/O Mohinder Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana Through ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)116PLR225

..... 17438 of 1994 followed in other civil writ petitions as well (supra) had directed the state and the gram panchayat not to dispossess the petitioners from their possession under the punjab village common land (regulations) haryana amendment act, 1992 which was declared ultra vires by the full bench of this court.13. ..... on merits, the final order dated 31.7.1995 passed by the trial magistrate is devoid of any judicial consideration for the fact that the magistrate did not care to peruse the documents produced before him especially the revenue record in the form of jamabandies and the khasra girdawaries that the property in question was held by the petitioners as pattedars for more than three decades. ..... although in reply to the notices issued by the sub divisional magistrate for 17.7.1995 all the documents along with jamabandies, khasra girdawaries order of the high court dated 8.5.1995 and copies of the orders passed by the civil courts restraining the respondents from dispossessing the petitioners from their peaceful possession were filed but the said magistrate passed an order under sections 145/46 of the cr.p.c. ..... they were the pattedars of the portion of the land comprising 1038 kanals of land as zumla 'malkan with regard to which even this court vide its order dated may 8, 1995 in civil writ petition no. .....

Cwp No.22719 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Director Rural Development and Pancha ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... on the other hand, it is submitted on behalf of the state of punjab that the intention of the legislature was to add the amended provisions including clause (ii) of sub section (3) of section 4 w.e.f 4.5.1961 i.e the date on which, the principal act of 1961 was enforced as the same is clear from the recommendations dated 29.1.1975 of the high powered committee on panchayati raj- amendments in the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 thereby proposing certain amendments in the act of 1961. ..... , cwp no.18122 of 1995, decided on 19.02.2013, as to date of applicability of section 4(3) (ii) of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961, it would be appropriate that the matter be placed before hon'ble the acting chief justice, for constituting a larger bench, if deemed appropriate. ..... , decided on 19.2.2013 in cwp no.18122 of 1995, situated in the state of haryana wherein private respondent no.4 therein was found to have constructed his house 20 to 25 years before coming into force the act no.2 of 1981, a division bench of this court came to the conclusion that the word this act . .....

Gram Panchayat of Village Kherri Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)137PLR585

..... learned counsel for the private respondents has, however, invited the attention of this court to a notification dated 8.4.1996 whereby section 2 of the punjab act 18 of 1961 came to be amended insofar its applicability to the state of haryana is concerned.as per the aforesaid amendment, sub-clause (ii-a) was inserted in section 2 of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961. ..... in view of the amendment relied upon by the private respondents, which necessarily entails that allotment made by the custodian in favour of any person after the commencement of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 but before 9.7.1985 would stand protected. ..... without taking into consideration the amendment effected by the insertion of clause (ii-a) in section 2 of punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961.9. ..... clause (ii-a) of section 2 of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 would clearly protect the ownership rights of the private respondents.7. ..... insofar as the reliance placed on the judgment rendered in veer kaur's case (supra) is concerned, the same is clearly misconceived in view of the fact that the judgment therein was rendered on 16.11.1995 i.e. .....