Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... court in lpa no.1719 of 2011 titled as state of punjab and another versus bhupinder singh, decided on 25.09.2012 (annexure p-5).petitioner is entitled to continue in service till the age of 60 years.he is to retire on 31.05.2013 and, therefore, in the light of the judgment passed by this court, petitioner has submitted a representation dated 29.01.2013 (annexure p-6) to the superintending engineer, kandi canal circle, hoshiapur-respondent no.4 with a copy to the principal secretary (irrigation).department of irrigation, government of punjab, punjab-respondent no.2. counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner, at this stage, ..... 25.05.2011 (annexure p-4) extending the benefit of the said instructions to all categories of disabled government employees as specified under section 2 (i) of the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation ) act, 1995. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... in the light of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation projecting therein his claim and depicting therein his entitlement to continue in service till the age of 60 years.if such a representation is made by the petitioner within a period of six weeks, the same shall be considered and decided by the principal secretary/secretary (school education).department of education, government of punjab-respondent no.2 within a period of two months from the date of submission of such representation. ..... as per the policy decision of the government of punjab, petitioner is entitled to continue in service till the age of 60 years instead of 58 years.on attainment of which petitioner was retired on 30.11.2011. ..... 25.05.2011 (annexure p-4).against which appeal preferred by the state of punjab i.e.lpa no.1719 of 2011 stands dismissed by this court vide order dated 25.09.2012 (annexure p-5).petitioner has submitted a representation dated 20.10.2012 (annexure p-6) to the circle education officer, jalandhar school education department, punjab. ..... (oral) petitioner asserts that he is 60% orthopedically handicapped and is covered under the category of persons with disability under sections 2 (i) and 2(t) the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... submit that even though under the regularization policy dated 18.03.2011 at annexure p-4, the name of the department in which they are serving has not been mentioned, yet there is a specific recommendation in their favour for the department of village development and panchayats to be also added in the instructions dated 18.03.2011 (annexue p-4).towards such assertion, counsel has adverted to the file notings dated 12.10.2011 and 29.11.2011 supplied to the petitioners under the provisions of right to information act, 2005. ..... counsel would argue that the petitioners are also vested with a right to be considered for regularization under the policy kaur harjeet 2013.08.22 12:34 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.18256 of 2013 -2- dated 18.03.2011 at annexure p-4. ..... also placed reliance upon an order dated 30.05.2013 passed by a coordinate bench in cwp no.12441 of 2013 titled as anil kumar & others versus state of punjab & others (annexure p-8).whereby directions had been issued in the case of similarly situated employees to consider the representation and claim for regularization. ..... the claim raised in the instant writ petition is as regards regularization of their services against the posts on which they have been working ..... 08.2013 shamsher singh & others ...petitioners versus state of punjab & another ...respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice tejinder singh ..... cwp no.18256 of 2013 -1- in the high court of punjab & haryana at chandigarh cwp no.18256 of 2013 date .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... it has not been disputed by the counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner has availed of the remedy of a statutory appeal against the order of dismissal under the punjab civil services (punishment & appeal) rules, ..... counsel would however, contend that the petitioner has sought information under the provisions of right of information act, 2005 and in response thereto, the file notings as regards his statutory appeal having been processed have been furnished to him and the same have been kaur harjeet 2013.07.19 17:03 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.14927 of 2013 -2- placed on record as ..... the instant writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 07.09.2011 (annexure p-2) passed by the director cum special secretary of the respondent-department, whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service on the basis of conviction by the competent court in case fir no.23 dated ..... oral) the petitioner was appointed as a gram sewak under the rural development and panchayats department, state of punjab in the year ..... in the light of such facts, it would not be appropriate for this court to go into the legality and correctness of the order of dismissal dated 07.09.2011 at ..... cwp no.14927 of 2013 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.14927 of 2013 date of ..... issued to respondent no.1 to pass a final order on the statutory appeal dated 29.08.2012 (annexure p-3) that the petitioner had preferred against his order of dismissal. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
..... uoi -2011 (21) str 100 (pandh) had decided in similar situation that there is a service being rendered by the builder to the prospective customers and therefore service tax was rightly leviable and the order of the commissioner (appeal) to refund the tax collected is not legally ..... for the purposes of this sub-clause, construction of a complex which is intended for sale, wholly or partly, by a builder or any person authorised by the builder before, during or after construction (except in cases for which no sum is received from or on behalf of the prospective buyer by the builder or a person authorised by the builder before the grant of completion certificate by the authority competent to issue such certificate under any law for the time being in force) shall be deemed to be service provided by the builder to the ..... exhaustive data showing that all persons who bought the flats joined the project before the respondents started paying service tax and that nothing over and above the amount initially agreed to before the respondents started paying service tax will be required to come to a clear conclusion that there is no unjust enrichment in this ..... points out the fact that the honourable high court of punjab and haryana in the case of ..... opinion, therefore, irrespective of applicability of section 11b of the act, the doctrine can be invoked to deny the benefit to which a person is not otherwise entitled. ..... point out that the case before the high court of punjab and haryana in the case of g. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... the committee has also gone through the following section 15(5) and section 15(6) of the right to information act, 2005:- 15(5) the state chief information commissioner and the state information commissioners shall be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, management, khurmi rakesh 2014.04.01 10:22 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document civil writ petition no.4340 of2014:{ 8 }: journalism mass media or administrator and governance. ..... the committee further considered the directions given by the hon ble high court of punjab and haryana vide order dated 17.8.2011 in cwp no.11846 of 2011 and hon ble supreme court of india vide order dated 3.3.2011 in centre for pil s case (wp(c) no.348 of 2010) and after detailed discussions and deliberations, the committee decided to consider all the names which come to its notice or are forwarded by any person or by any aspirant for appointment as information commissioners keeping in view fairness, rational criteria ..... civil writ petition no.4340 of2014:{ 1 }: in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh date of decision: march25 2014 munish kumar sharma .....petitioner versus state of haryana and others ....respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice augustine george masih present: mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... the service period of the handicapped category persons has been enhanced by two years.vide instructions dated 17.01.2001, the said benefit was restricted to only blind employees, which was challenged through a writ petition i.e.cwp no.7233 of 2010 titled as bhupinder singh versus state of punjab and others.wherein it was claimed that the benefit be extended to all persons who fall within the definition of 'persons with disability' as provided under section 2 (t) of the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights ..... ) prayer in this application is for disposal of the writ petition in the light of the judgment passed by this court in cwp no.7233 of 2010 titled as bhupinder singh versus state of punjab and others.decided on 25.05.2011 (annexure p-4).which has been upheld by a division bench of this court in lpa no.1719 of 2011 vide order dated 25.09.2012, which was preferred by the state of punjab against the judgment of the learned single judge. ..... and full participation ) act, 1995. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... (oral) petitioner has approached this court with a grievance that despite he being a physically handicapped person falling within the definition of a disabled person as provided in section 2 (i) of the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995, extension of two years in service has not been granted to him despite he having submitted a representation dated 22.04.2012 (annexure p-3) to the registrar, cooperative societies, punjab-respondent no.2 basing his claim cwp no.6946 o 2. ..... upon a judgment passed by this court in cwp no.7233 of 2010 titled as bhupinder singh versus state of punjab and others.decided on 25.05.2011 (annexure p-5).the said representation of the petitioner was not considered by the respondents and an order dated 28.05.2012 (annexure p-4) was passed by the registrar, cooperative societies, punjab retiring the petitioner w.e.f.31.05.2012 on attaining the age of 58 years.petitioner was entitled to continue in service till the age of 60 years.which benefit has not been granted to him. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... they also seek a mandamus for acceptance of their applications and grant route permits applied for by them; (v) the petitioners in cwp nos.5611, 5591, 13557, 20859 & 22820 of 2011; 8783, 17880, 17869, 17876, 19880, 19898, 19899, 19900, 19912 of 2012 seek quashing of the punjab mini bus service scheme, 2010 notified on may 19, 2010 as it allegedly ultra vires the provisions of the motor vehicles act, 1988 and also the constitution of india. ..... guaranteed under article 19(1)(g) and authorizes the state to make any law, imposing in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the afore- stated right and, in particular enables the state to make law relating to the carrying on by the state, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the state, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise . ..... 99, 100 and 104 along with section 2[38].of the act, removed the doubts, if any were ever left, by setting out that once a scheme is published under section 100 in relation to any area or route or portion thereof, whether in complete or partial exclusion of other persons, no person other than the stus have a right to operate on the notified area or route except as provided in the scheme itself and wherever the stu in spite of grant of permit does not operate the service, the only recours.is to cwp no.15786 of 1999 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... (oral) petitioner has approached this court claiming the benefit of the punjab government instructions dated 16.02.1996 (annexure p-3).according to which, the petitioner, who belongs to the category of handicapped persons as defined under the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation ) act, 1995 and is suffering from orthopadical handicap of 70% has not been granted extension of two years.which would cwp no.9287 o 2. ..... of 2010 which writ petition was allowed by this court vide judgment dated 25.05.2011 (annexure p-6).on the basis of the said judgment, petitioner has approached the respondents for his continuation in service till the age of 60 years.appeal preferred by the state of punjab against the said judgment i.e.lpa no.1719 of 2011 titled as state of punjab and another versus bhupinder singh stands dismissed vide judgment dated 25.09.2012 (annexure a-1) and, therefore, the claim of the petitioner for continuation in service till the age of 60 years has been further fortified ..... enable him to continue in service till the age of 60 years.petitioner, prior to date of super-annuation, approached this court by filing the present writ petition claiming the benefit of the said instructions. .....
Tag this Judgment!