Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the pondicherry home guards act 1965 Sorted by: recent Page 100 of about 22,698 results (0.678 seconds)

Dec 14 2017 (HC)

Sushil Kumar vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... " the supreme court in that case further observed:"keeping in view the dehumanising aspect of the crime, the flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the victim of the crime and the growing rise in the crimes of this type, where only a few come to light and others don't, we hope that the government and legislature would give serious thought to the recommendation of the law commission and bring about appropriate changes in the law.... ..... was come as a result of head injury which was ante-mortem in nature and caused by blunt force head injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death and in answer to a question by the defence recorded at page no.3 of your statement dated 27th january 1997 you had stated head injuries were not cause of the death but infarcts alone were cause of death in this case in common medical term we call infarcts as an injury known as cava ..... mahesh did not even act as a guard; he did not prevent anil kumar (pw21 from entering the house. ..... during the progress of an attack on the person who is intended to be beaten but the evidence in that behalf should be clear and cogent or suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the proof which is essential to bring home the offence to the accused." 68. ..... ut of pondicherry (2010) 1 scc199 it was explained by the supreme court that a pedantic approach cannot be applied while dealing with the evidence of an crl. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2017 (HC)

Ramesh Chand vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... " the supreme court in that case further observed:"keeping in view the dehumanising aspect of the crime, the flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the victim of the crime and the growing rise in the crimes of this type, where only a few come to light and others don't, we hope that the government and legislature would give serious thought to the recommendation of the law commission and bring about appropriate changes in the law.... ..... was come as a result of head injury which was ante-mortem in nature and caused by blunt force head injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death and in answer to a question by the defence recorded at page no.3 of your statement dated 27th january 1997 you had stated head injuries were not cause of the death but infarcts alone were cause of death in this case in common medical term we call infarcts as an injury known as cava ..... mahesh did not even act as a guard; he did not prevent anil kumar (pw21 from entering the house. ..... during the progress of an attack on the person who is intended to be beaten but the evidence in that behalf should be clear and cogent or suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the proof which is essential to bring home the offence to the accused." 68. ..... ut of pondicherry (2010) 1 scc199 it was explained by the supreme court that a pedantic approach cannot be applied while dealing with the evidence of an crl. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2017 (HC)

Avinash Kumar vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... " the supreme court in that case further observed:"keeping in view the dehumanising aspect of the crime, the flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the victim of the crime and the growing rise in the crimes of this type, where only a few come to light and others don't, we hope that the government and legislature would give serious thought to the recommendation of the law commission and bring about appropriate changes in the law.... ..... was come as a result of head injury which was ante-mortem in nature and caused by blunt force head injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death and in answer to a question by the defence recorded at page no.3 of your statement dated 27th january 1997 you had stated head injuries were not cause of the death but infarcts alone were cause of death in this case in common medical term we call infarcts as an injury known as cava ..... mahesh did not even act as a guard; he did not prevent anil kumar (pw21 from entering the house. ..... during the progress of an attack on the person who is intended to be beaten but the evidence in that behalf should be clear and cogent or suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the proof which is essential to bring home the offence to the accused." 68. ..... ut of pondicherry (2010) 1 scc199 it was explained by the supreme court that a pedantic approach cannot be applied while dealing with the evidence of an crl. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2017 (HC)

Kuldeep Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... " the supreme court in that case further observed:"keeping in view the dehumanising aspect of the crime, the flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the victim of the crime and the growing rise in the crimes of this type, where only a few come to light and others don't, we hope that the government and legislature would give serious thought to the recommendation of the law commission and bring about appropriate changes in the law.... ..... was come as a result of head injury which was ante-mortem in nature and caused by blunt force head injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death and in answer to a question by the defence recorded at page no.3 of your statement dated 27th january 1997 you had stated head injuries were not cause of the death but infarcts alone were cause of death in this case in common medical term we call infarcts as an injury known as cava ..... mahesh did not even act as a guard; he did not prevent anil kumar (pw21 from entering the house. ..... during the progress of an attack on the person who is intended to be beaten but the evidence in that behalf should be clear and cogent or suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the proof which is essential to bring home the offence to the accused." 68. ..... ut of pondicherry (2010) 1 scc199 it was explained by the supreme court that a pedantic approach cannot be applied while dealing with the evidence of an crl. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2017 (HC)

Chottey Lal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... " the supreme court in that case further observed:"keeping in view the dehumanising aspect of the crime, the flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the victim of the crime and the growing rise in the crimes of this type, where only a few come to light and others don't, we hope that the government and legislature would give serious thought to the recommendation of the law commission and bring about appropriate changes in the law.... ..... was come as a result of head injury which was ante-mortem in nature and caused by blunt force head injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death and in answer to a question by the defence recorded at page no.3 of your statement dated 27th january 1997 you had stated head injuries were not cause of the death but infarcts alone were cause of death in this case in common medical term we call infarcts as an injury known as cava ..... mahesh did not even act as a guard; he did not prevent anil kumar (pw21 from entering the house. ..... during the progress of an attack on the person who is intended to be beaten but the evidence in that behalf should be clear and cogent or suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the proof which is essential to bring home the offence to the accused." 68. ..... ut of pondicherry (2010) 1 scc199 it was explained by the supreme court that a pedantic approach cannot be applied while dealing with the evidence of an crl. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2017 (HC)

Sri Manjunath Shetty Vs. Bangalore Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

..... even before cancellation of the registered sale deed (document) unilaterally, when presented by the officer of bda, it is the duty of jurisdictional additional district registrar, bangalore urban district that before registration, he has to follow the procedure as contemplated under the provisions of sections 32, 32a of the registration act, 1908 read with rule 41 of karnataka registration rules 1965 sections 32, 32a of the registration act reads as under: 32. ..... following the principles of natural justice to both the vendor and the present petitioner and the jurisdictional additional district registrar has no jurisdiction to cancel the registration of the sale deed dated 25.06.2013 unilaterally without the consent of the second respondent in whose favour the bda registered the document and he is not the competent authority to cancel the same in view of the provisions of section 31 of the specific relief act, 1963 and the civil court is the only competent and exclusive authority to cancel the sale deeds on obtaining the proof of fraud played by the vendor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2017 (SC)

Mohammed Abdulla Khan Vs. Prakash K.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... it was further held that though the presumption under section 7 of the press and registration of books act, 1867 is not applicable to somebody whose name is printed in the newspaper as the chief editor, the complainant can still allege and prove that persons other than the editor, if they are responsible for the publication of the defamatory material. 20. ..... as the judge has, however, misapprehended the effect of act xxv of 1867, we shall set aside the order of acquittal made by him and direct him to restore the appeal to his file, to consider the evidence produced by the accused and then to dispose of the appeal with reference to the foregoing observations ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that there can be no vicarious liability insofar as the criminal law the complainant s allegation of the defamatory material published in the newspaper against him, even if it is established, can only be sustained against the editor of the newspaper and not the owner of the newspaper. ..... the provisions contained in the act clearly go to show that there could be a presumption against the editor whose name is printed in the newspaper to the effect that he is the editor of such publication and that he is responsible for selecting the matter for publication ..... praying that the prosecution be quashed on the ground that section 7 of the press and registration of books act, 1867 only permits the prosecution of the editor but not the chief editor. ..... badalia, (1965) 2 cri lj693(pat) 6 13. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 2017 (HC)

Khazan Singh vs.dtc

Court : Delhi

..... is not necessary to allude to the details of the award, dated 20th june 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the arbitral award ), which came to be delivered by the arbitral board; suffice it to state that the operative portion, thereof, read thus: having given its careful consideration to the whole of the material on the record and having examined the merits of the case presented both by the official and staff sites, in the light of the entire material and the arguments advanced by the aforesaid representatives of both sides and having ..... also placed, in the written submission of the petitioner, on the delhi transport authority act 1958, and the delhi road transport authority (conditions of appointment & services) regulations 1952, as well as delhi transport corporation (scales of pay) regulations 1992, to contend that, right from its inception, administrative control over the respondent-corporation was that of the central government, to the extent that even when, for some time, the respondent-corporation was under the mcd, the pay scale extended to ..... unfortunate age in which persons, having high qualifications, are forced, by constraints of hearth and home, to accept positions totally incommensurate with the qualifications held by them ..... . by notification dated 1-9- 1965, there was change in the designation of posts of drawing office staff in cpwd and draughtsman was designated as draughtsman grade i, assistant draughtsman was designated as draughtsman grade ii and tracer was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2017 (HC)

Savitur Prasad vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... the parliament in its infinite wisdom promulgated the administrative tribunal act, 1985, whereby all the jurisdiction, powers and authority exercisable by all courts immediately prior to the coming into effect of the said act, in so far as it relates to service matters concerning a civilian, not being a member of all india services, which the appellant admittedly is, are conferred exclusively on the central administrative tribunals under the said act ..... ) 3 scc261 wherein it was held as follows: in view of the reasoning adopted by us, we hold that clause 2(d) of article 323a and clause 3(d) of article 323b, to the extent they exclude the jurisdiction of the high courts and the supreme court under articlesand 32 of the constitution, are unconstitutional. ..... after considering the aforesaid decisions relied upon by the parties, the learned single judge came to the conclusion that the petitioner ought to be relegated before the central administrative tribunal, delhi, to avail his remedies, in ..... therefore, be open for litigants to directly approach the high courts even in cases where they question the vires of statutory legislations (except where the legislation which creates the particular tribunal is challenged) by overlooking the jurisdiction of the concerned tribunal. ..... that the hon ble president of india has placed the appellant under suspension, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of rule 10 of the central civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1965.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2017 (SC)

Gunwantlal Godawat Vs. Union of India Custom and Central Excise Throug ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... repealed and upon such repeal, section 6 of the general clauses act, 1897, shall apply as if the said part were a central act; (2) notwithstanding the repeal made by sub-section (1) but without prejudice to the application of section 6 of the general clauses act, 1897, any notification, order, direction, appointment or declaration made or any notice, licence or certificate issued or permission, authorization or exemption granted or any confiscation adjudged or penalty or fine imposed or any forfeiture ordered or 8 parliament enacted the gold (control) act, 1965 (18 of 65), which was never ..... brought into force (for reasons not known nor necessary to be known for the purpose of ..... . (1) the gold (control) act, 1965 (18 of 1965), and the gold (control) ordinance, 1968 (6 of 1968), are hereby repealed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //