Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the pondicherry home guards act 1965 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 23,418 results (0.568 seconds)

Feb 13 1975 (HC)

Major of the Commune D' Ariancoupon Vs. R. Krishenin, Ex. Commissiopta ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1975)IILLJ536Mad

..... after the de jure merger, the pondicherry civil courts act was enacted, which abolished the jurisdiction of the administrative court at pondicherry and directed that all cases pending before the said court shall be heard and disposed of by the district judge or the additional district judge in accordance with the procedure followed immediately before the commencement of the pondicherry civil courts act, 1966. ..... previously the orders of the administrative court, pondicherry went up in appeal to the conseil d' etat of france, but after the de jure merger, the appellate jurisdiction exercised by the conseil d' etat has been vested in this high court under section 10 of the pondicherry administration act, 1968. ..... i share, the wonder of the learned district judge how a person who entered the service of the municipality in the year 1938 could be presumed to continue as a temporary employee till the year 1965, that is to say, for 27 years, further, the very order of the mayor, by which the respondent was dismissed, expressly refers to the fact that the mayor's order was passed under article 14 of the arrete, which prohibits the mayor from inflicting the penalty of dismissal without getting the opinion of the disciplinary council. ..... by an order dated 30-3-1965 (vide exhibit al) the respondent was dismissed by the mayor for the following reasons:(1) that he was absent from his office during office hours. ..... he was dismissed on 30-3-1965. .....

Tag this Judgment!

1847

Ford Vs. Douglas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , the adjudged creditor, in answer to the bill, denied the validity of the probate sales of the plantations and slaves to the complainants and charged that they were effected and the pretended title thereto acquired by fraud and covin between the executor, stephen douglas and the executrix, the widow of the testator, and one of the complainants, for the purpose of hindering and defrauding the creditors of the estate, that in furtherance of this design, a large amount of simulated and fraudulent claims of the executor and executrix were presented against the ..... and so firmly settled and fixed is this principle in the jurisprudence of louisiana as a rule of property and as administered in the courts of that state that even if the sale and conveyance by authentic act, or in pursuance of a judicial sale, are confessedly fraudulent and void, still no title passes to a purchaser under the judgment and execution, not a creditor of the vender, so as to enable him to attack the conveyance and obtain possession of the property. ..... 1965, 1973, 1984, and in the code of practice, 3, art. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1892 (FN)

Logan Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ordered to be severed and tried separately, and the former order of consolidation was confirmed as to the four indictments, all of which, as they then stood, were charges against the same persons "for the same act or transaction," or at least "for two or more acts or transactions connected together," and therefore within the very terms and purpose of the section of the revised statutes above quoted, and might perhaps have been ordered, in the discretion of the court, to be tried together, independently ..... that, while certain fundamental rights, recognized and declared, but not granted or created, in some of the amendments to the constitution, are thereby guarantied only against violation or abridgment by the united states or by the state, as the case may be, and cannot therefore be affirmatively enforced by congress against unlawful acts of individuals, yet that every right created by, arising under, or dependent upon the constitution of the united states, may be protected and enforced by congress by such means and in such manner ..... evidence in the case tending to show that johnson, while lying wounded at his home after the fight, assented, at the solicitation of some of the defendants, to the publication in a newspaper of a statement that logan was one of the guards at dry creek on the night of ..... the proviso as to actions by or against executors, administrators, or guardians was added, by way of amendment to section 3 of the appropriation act above mentioned, by the act of march 3, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1893 (PC)

Gopal Row and anr. Vs. the Bank of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1893)3MLJ197

..... observed by the judge, it is clear that the plaintiff bank was lending money to 1st defendant in belief of his solvency until just before he ran away to pondicherry and there is nothing to show, and no inference can be fairly drawn, that 2nd and 3rd defendants had any better knowledge of 1st defendant's contemplated act of insolvency ..... b 434 in the present case it is found by the judge that 2nd and 3rd defendants are not shown to have acted otherwise than in good faith in accepting the transfer of the decree and that they have paid considerable sums to creditors on the strength of it. ..... the district judge has found that the 2nd and 3rd defendants acted in good faith in accepting the plaint transfer and that they have paid considerable sums to creditors on the strength of it, but that it is nevertheless void because the instrument in ..... the plaintiff's case is that the instrument in question was executed by 1st defendant fraudulently and in collusion with 2nd and 3rd defendants with the object of delaying and defeating the just claims of the plaintiff to whom he was indebted at the time on account of bills executed or endorsed by him amounting ..... the suit out of which this appeal has arisen was instituted by the bank of madras, for a declaration that an instrument dated 12th april 1889 executed by, 1st defendant to 2nd and 3rd defendants, transferring to the latter a decree held by the former against the zamindar of karvetnaggar is void, if not altogether, at least as against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1893 (PC)

Gopal and anr. Vs. Bank of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1893)ILR16Mad397

..... as observed by the judge, it is clear that the plaintiff bank was lending money to first defendant in belief of his solvency until just before he ran away to pondicherry, and there is nothing to show and no inference can be fairly drawn, that second and third defendants had any better knowledge of first defendant's contemplated act of insolvency. ..... has found that the second and third defendants acted in good faith in accepting the plaint transfer and that they have paid considerable sums to creditors on the strength of it, but that it is nevertheless void, because the instrument in question (exhibit a) is not really a sale-deed, but a deed of trust in favour of certain preferred creditors, including the trustees themselves (second and third defendants) and 'according to english law a trust evincing an unfair preference of creditors is bad, no matter what may ..... have been the importunity of such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1899 (PC)

Goor Bux Sahoo Vs. Birj Lal Benka and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1889)ILR26Cal275

..... go into the merits of the question, whether the cause of action to the plaintiff really arose within the jurisdiction of the court of the subordinate judge of patna; but, as already stated, being of opinion that the amendment as prayed for by the plaintiff ought not to have been allowed by the subordinate judge, and confining, as we understand it, his attention to the plaint, has held that the plaint should be returned to the plaintiff for the purpose of being presented to the proper court, being apparently of opinion that, upon the recitals in the plaint, the suit was ..... not cognizable in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 1905 (FN)

Thompson Vs. Darden

Court : US Supreme Court

..... speaking of the requirements of the statute, the supreme court of appeals of virginia said in its opinion in this case: "by the provisions of the sections of the code quoted, all vessels (except coastwise vessels with a pilot license) inward bound from the sea to smith's point, yorktown, newport news, or norfolk, or any intermediate point, and all such vessels outward bound to the sea from smith's point, yorktown, newport news, or norfolk, or any intermediate point, are subject to the compulsory regulations and rates therein ..... , prohibiting discriminations because it imposes compulsory pilotage on all vessels bound in and out through the capes, and does not impose it on vessels navigating the internal waters of the state; nor can this objection be sustained on the ground that the navigation of the internal waters of virginia is more tortuous than that in and out of the capes. ..... "the pilot law violates 4236 of the revised statutes, which provides: the master of any vessel coming into or going out of any port situate upon waters which are the boundary between two states may employ any pilot duly licensed or authorized by the law of either of the states bounded on such waters to pilot the vessel to or from such port. ..... " the arguments made to support the assertion that the pilot laws conflict with the act of congress are two-fold. ..... virginia code of 1887, 1963, 1965, 1966, 1978, and 1900. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1906 (PC)

S. Srinivasamoorthy Otherwise Called Shamanna Vs. N.T. Venkata Varada ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1906)16MLJ238

..... , it would be useless and unjust to direct him to do the act, but when there is no such impediment' (and there is none in the present case) 'the courts of this country, in the exercise of their jurisdiction over contracts made here, or in administering equities between parties residing here, act upon their own rules and are not influenced by any consideration of what the effect of such contracts might be in the country where the lands are situate, or of the manner in which the courts of such countries might deal with ..... therein lord lindley was dealing with they matter of jurisdiction over a foreigner irrespective of any statutory provisions and when he said 'that although the defendant was a foreigner, and although the cause of action arose in a foreign country, and although the defendant did not personally reside within the local limits of the jurisdiction of any court in british india, and was not even temporarily in arcot when sued there' he necessarily assumed that among others temporary presence ..... 544 the privy council were dealing with an appeal from this court, in which this court, reversing the decision of the district court, had dismissed a suit which had been brought on a decree obtained in the french court at pondicherry. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1908 (PC)

Bindeshri Prasad Vs. Mahadeo Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All137

..... such are the powers given by the act to a district court for the purpose of appointing or declaring a guardian of the person or the property of a minor. ..... section 46 allows the district court to call upon the collector or upon any court subordinate to it for a report on any matter arising in any proceeding under the act and treat the report as evidence.5. ..... the facts are these: one bindeshri prasad, the managing member of a joint hindu family governed by the mitakshara, applied to the district judge of allahabad under section 10 of the guardians and wards act (no. ..... this is an appeal from an order of the learned district judge of allahabad appointing a guardian of the person and property of a minor named kedar nath under the provisions of the guardians and wards act, 1890. ..... there is nothing in the act to authorize a district court to refer the question of the appointment or declaration of a guardian to arbitration. ..... the law on the subject is now contained in the guardians and wards act (no. ..... some special acts, for instance, the act dealing with religious endowments, no. ..... no such power is given in the guardians and wards act, and it is easy to understand why this should be so. ..... this is an appeal from an order passed by the learned district judge of allahabad under the guardians and wards act (no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1909 (PC)

Mathuradas Gokuldas and Co. Vs. Narbadashankar Harjivan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 4Ind.Cas.99

..... a usually an honest dealer knew that b was a pure gambler, then any contract which he made with b with that knowledge would be a contract in furtherance of wagering and would fall within the scope of act iii of 1865, while it would likewise follow, that waiving that consideration, a could not strictly be said to have intended to give or take delivery to or from b. ..... rice at all, nor any means of dealing with rice in large quantities; if we find that such contracts have been made over and over again, embracing goods worth lacs of rupees; but invariably settled by the payment of differences on due date, then i apprehend that notwithstanding the surface propriety of the formal contracts, notwithstanding a's appeals to his great legitimate business, and his assertions that for his part he was always in a position to fulfil his contracts ..... being as it is in doubt, to put it most favourably to the defendant, the court would not be too anxious to scrutinize the lapse of a minute or two, while it would be ready to doubt the accuracy of the defendant's clock (even assuming his evidence to be more trustworthy on this point than it is) and lean in favour of the evidence for the plaintiff which is at least as good and proves that the tender of delivery orders) was well within the prescribed time. ..... is a suit to recover on certain forward contracts for the purchase of rice, the due dates of which were the pagan and chaitar vaidas of 1965 corresponding with february- march, and march-april 1909. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //