Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the plantations labour act 1951 Court: chennai Page 63 of about 687 results (0.106 seconds)

Sep 23 1953 (HC)

Karumbayiram Pillai Annadhana Dharma Charities Nachiarkoil by Its Trus ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1954Mad805; (1954)IMLJ277

..... 100 of 1952 on the file of the revenue court, tanjore, by which that court dismissed an appeal preferred to it from the decision of the conciliation officer, kumbakonam, holding that the first respondent is a 'cultivating tenant' as defined in the madras act 14 of 1952 and had been in possession of the properties on 1-12-1951, and, as such, entitled to be let into possession hereafter for a period of five years.it is unnecessary to discuss the various questions that had been raised in the courts below. ..... ' in section 2(d) is as follows :' 'cultivating tenant' or 'tenant' means a person who contributes his own physical labour or that of the members of his family in the cultivation of any land belonging to another, under a tenancy agreement, express or implied and includes the heirs of such person but shall not include a mere intermediary or his heirs;''land-owner' is defined in section 2(g) in the following manner :' 'land-owner' means the owner or other person deriving rights under him, who lets land or cultivates by a tenant ..... desikan appearing for the petitioner contends that the order of the revenue court is without jurisdiction inasmuch as it has thoroughly misunderstood the meaning of the term 'cultivating tenant' in section 2(d) of the act and the term 'land-owner' in section 2(g). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2010 (HC)

R.N. Veerappan and ors. Vs. State of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2010]322ITR662(Mad)

..... state of tamil nadu : [1995] 215 itr 520 (mad), where the assessee was one of the constituents of the estate which carried on the business of plantation with a common management with regard to the lands belonging to the assessee, a division bench of this court had observed that the constituents of the assessee should be assessed as co-sharers instead of association of individuals.8. ..... whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the commissioner was justified in law in setting aside separate composition orders rightly passed by the agricultural income-tax officer under section 65 of the act on the basis of valid application filed by the petitioner under section 65(1) in respect of his separate and specific extent of land allotted to him under a registered deed of partition, when the department had all along accepted the partition and separate enjoyment of the lands allotted to the petitioner?4. ..... the order of the agricultural income-tax officer is on the basis that the erstwhile partnership firm was dissolved, the properties were partitioned among the three individuals, that they maintained separate bank accounts, that their individual claims over their respective properties have been accepted by the labour department, that they have also maintained three check rolls for three estates, the scrutiny of records revealed that raw tea leaves were sold in individual names and all the three .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2011 (HC)

Ms.Dorothy Thomas Vs. Mr.Rex Arul

Court : Chennai

..... filed in the forum where the respondent is domiciled or habitually and permanently resides and the relief is granted on a ground available in the matrimonial law under which the parties are married; (ii) where the respondent voluntarily and effectively submits to the jurisdiction of the forum as discussed above and contests the claim which is based on a ground available under the matrimonial law under which the parties are married; (iii) where the respondent consents to the grant of the relief although the jurisdiction of the forum is not in accordance with the provisions of the matrimonial law of ..... . it was held by the court that while the writ court's jurisdiction arises in cases where the alleged detenue is within its territorial jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of the court under the guardians and wards act, is determined by the place where the minor ordinarily resides ..... y.venkata lakshmi {(1991) 3 scc 451} that the labours of the law commission poured in its 65th report on this very subject, had not fructified eversince april 1976, when it was submitted. ..... . mckee {1951 1 all er 942}, where lord simonds held that in proceedings relating to custody, the welfare and happiness of the infant was of paramount consideration and that the order of a foreign court in u.s.a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1964 (HC)

E.M. Forster and anr. Vs. A.N. Parasuram

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1964Mad331

..... 1(2) of the act runs as follows:'(2) for the purposes of this act, 'copyright' means the sole right to produce or reproduce the work or any substantial part thereof in any material form whatsoever; to perform, or in the case of a lecture to deliver, the work or any substantial part thereof in public; if the work is unpublished, to publish the work or any substantial part thereof; and shall includes the sole right (a) to produce, reproduce, perform, or publish any translation of the work; (b) in the case of a dramatic work, to convert it into a novel or other non-dramatic work; (c) in the ..... copyright in a work shall be deemed to be infringed by any person who, without the consent of the owner of the copyright, does anything the sole right to do which is by this act conferred on the owner of the copyright; provided that the following acts shall not constitute an infringement of copyright - (i) any fair dealing with any work for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, review, newspaper summary;'3. ..... ' it will be observed that it is product of the labour, skill and capital of one which must not be appropriated by another, not the elements, the raw material, if one may' use the expression, upon which the labour and skill and capita! ..... ); russell-clarke on copyright and industrial design, 1951 edn. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1988 (HC)

P. Jagajeevan Ram and Etc. Vs. Govt. of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1989Mad149

..... and constitution of india : whoever in any public place or in any other place within public view burns, mutilates, defaces, denies, disfigures, destroys, tramples upon or otherwise brings into contempt (whether by words, either spoken or written, or by acts) the indian national flag or the constitution of india or any part thereof, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.explanation 1: comments expressing disapprobation or criticism ..... to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes within the territory of india and the difficulties under which they labour and to make recommendations as to the steps that should be taken by the union or any state to remove such difficulties and to improve their condition and as to the grants that should be given for the purpose by the union or any state and the conditions subject to which such grants should be given, and the order appointing such commission shall define the procedure to be followed by the commission. ..... ambedkar referred to article 16(4) and said that backward classes are 'nothing else but a collection of certain castes' (parliamentary debates 1951, third session, part ii vol. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1954 (HC)

Samuel Stephen Richard Vs. Stella Richard

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1955Mad451; 1955CriLJ1192

..... (h) if the minor is old enough to form an intelligent preference that preference has to be considered (i) in the case of former european british subjects other things being equal, if the minor was a male of tender years or a female, the minor was to be given to the mother and if the minor was a male of age to require education and preparation for labour and business, then to the father (j) subject to the provisions of section 17, the court shall he guided by what consistently with the law to which the minor is subject appears in the circumstances to be for the welfare of the ..... the remedy for the father to obtain the custody of the children is an application under section 25 of the act and when the father makes an application under section 25, the welfare of the minor is the paramount consideration for deciding the custody and the judicial considerations which ought to weigh with a court in deciding under section 25 have been indicated above.15. ..... then after the father of the petitioner died in june 1951, the petitioner and respondent moved to pudupet and started living with the mother and sister of the petitioner. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2009 (HC)

JaIn Housing and Constructions Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ225

..... this would, therefore, mean that the arbitration act does not oust the jurisdiction of the civil court to decide the dispute in a case where parties to the arbitration agreement do not take appropriate steps as contemplated under sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 8 of the act.secondly, there is no provision in the act when the subject-matter of the suit includes subject-matter of the arbitration agreement as well as other disputes, the matter is required to be referred to arbitration. ..... whatever that may be in this scheme.d) not to make the owners/parties of the first part liable for any damages or claim from the sub-contractors or workmen or suppliers of building materials etc.e) not to deviate from the plan approved by the cmda, corporation of chennai or local municipal or panchayat authority.f) to take the entire care and sole responsibility for the construction work which include the responsibility, liability towards the cost of construction, building materials, labours, workmen, sub-contractors and engineers.g) to perform ..... 1951 of 1993 filed for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 5.5.1978 (registered as document no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1983 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sarada Binding Works

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1985]152ITR520(Mad)

..... cannot properly be described as a payment of gratuity, that by virtue of the employees being taken over with continuity of employment by the transferee-company, no claim could have been made by the employees against the assessee-company, that no liability for payment of gratuity as such to the employees thus having accrued against the assessee, the payment made by the assessee to the transferee could not be treated on the same footing as a discharge of the liability for gratuity payable to the employees and that, therefore, the amount was not deductible under s. ..... sri ranilakshmi ginning, spinning weaving mills [p] ltd, : [1981]132itr360(mad) , this court allowed deduction in one year in respect of the estimated gratuity payable to the employees for all the earlier years arrived at scientifically or actuarially under and agreement entered in to by the assessee with the labour. 13. ..... after the employees' provident funds act, 1952, came into force, the assessee were required to transfer all the accumulations in the funds to the employees' provident funds and the assessee accordingly transferred. ..... [1951] 32 tc 359, the assessee introduced in 1944 a staff assurance scheme, based upon a single assurance policy the annual premiums of pay certain additional annual premiums. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 1951 (HC)

In Re: M.L. Dalmia

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1952Mad197; (1951)2MLJ525

ordersomasundaram, j. 1. the main contention of the learned advocate for the petitioner is that the words 'subject to the provisions of this act' in section 9 must be read with section 7 of the act and therefore if the workman works for the extra period of 15 minutes mentioned in section 7, no extra wages need be paid. i am unable to agree with this contention. section 7 deals only with the time to be taken for serving a waiting customer, if he happens to come to the shop at about the closing time allowed by law. it is an indulgence granted for the advantage of the employer. but section 9 deals with extra wages to be paid to the workmen when they work for more than 8 hours a day. undoubtedly for the 15 minutes allowed to the employer to serve a waiting customer if the workman works and if it is beyond the 8 hours of his work then he is certainly entitled to extra wages for that brief period of 15 minutes. failure to pay for this extra period constitutes an offence. the conviction is therefore correct and the fine is not excessive. the petition is dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 1973 (HC)

Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax Vs. Ouchterloney Valley Estate ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1975]101ITR268(Mad)

..... the tribunal went into the question as to whether the amount set apart for payment of bonus is, in any way, inflated and ultimately said, 'we have no suspicion that the 'provision made during the year is, in any way, inflated, and it is also clear that it pertains to the bonus payable to the staff and labour pertaining to the relevant accounting year. ..... in this case we are concerned only with two items, viz i (1) staff and labour bonus to the extent of rs 1,25,000, and (2) the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80e of the central income-tax act. ..... the tribunal specifically finds that the entire amount has been set apart and provided for payment of the bonus to the staff and labour in relation to the relevant accounting year. ..... 1,25,000 was disallowed by the assessing authority on the ground that the expenditure had not actually been incurred by the assessee in connection with the business in the relevant accounting year. ..... the assessee, for the period ended march 31, 1966, created a provision for payment of bonus to the staff and labourers, relevant to the assessment year, of an amount of rs. ..... the tribunal has held that the assessee is entitled to the benefit, of the said provision in section 80e even in respect of proceedings for assessment under the madras agricultural income-tax act. ..... balmadies plantations ltd. ..... the assessee in this case was assessed under the said act for the assessment year 1966-67, and its income for the assessment year was determined at rs. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //