The Nalanda University Act 2010 No 39 Of 2010 21st September 2010 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the nalanda university act 2010 no 39 of 2010 21st september 2010 Page 1 of about 300 results (3.927 seconds)Ewaz Singh Vs. Umrai Singh and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1919All267; (1919)ILR61All270
the appeal act local no ii of 1901 agra tenancy act sections 25 31 and 57 schedule iv c article 18
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagan Nath Vs. Tirbeni Sahai and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Reported in : (1909)ILR31All41
employees of private schools conditions of service regulations act 1978 act no 3 1978 sections 9 2 21 jurisdiction of school
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGgsip University Vs. Dhruv Singhal and anr.
Court : Delhi
counselling for the said seats is attributable squarely to the university had the university held the counselling for the said seats acquisition act the provisions of section 126 of the mrtp act require application of the provisions of the land acquisition act september 2010 itself as it ultimately did on 30th september 2010 upon the said seats remaining vacant the same would have category seats also the university before this court on 29th september 2010 admitted that it was itself even then considering counselling
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMani D. Seervai ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra (Through the Secretary M ...
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR2001Bom229; 2001(2)ALLMR444; 2001(2)BomCR566; (2001)1BOMLR676
held reservation of open spaces for parks and playgrounds is universally recognised as a legitimate exercise of statutory power rationally related the reserved area being retained for recreation ground both the acts being done at the cost of the public purpose b in this context it is vital to note that section 39 of the m r t p act provides that the seervais to challenge the arbitrator s said award decisions dated 21st march 1974 and 27th september 1974 and or the second variation of the said scheme the said order dated 22nd september 1999 has been impugned in this petition 25 mr dada
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNamgyal Dolkar Vs. Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs
Court : Delhi
but children born after the date of commencement of the act will acquire citizenship by birth only if either of his this writ petition at the next hearing on 14th december 2010 mr sachin datta learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted officer fast track court ii tumkur in s c no 39 2003 acquitting the respondents accused for the offences punishable under with the writ petition 3 the petitioner states that on 21st april 2005 pursuant to an application made by her an 1 by a letter dated 1st september 2009 the regional passport officer delhi rpo informed the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. M. Sathiyapriya Vs. the Secretary to Government, Health and Family ...
Court : Chennai
Reported in : (2005)1MLJ378
consequently connected w a m ps are closed constitution application university act section 241 2 of government of india act 1935 or section 241 2 b of the government of india act 1935 cannot have any retrospective effect 21 in tata cellular health centre for three more years i e upto october 2010 hence the rural public would be benefited by medical attention eligibility service i e three years instead of two years 39 there is no dispute as to the laudable object namely on the basis that except for the bombay rules dated september 21 1939 and the gujarat notification dated august 21 1965
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDomingos Teles and anr. Vs. Clara Viegas (Smt.)
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR225
same could not be considered under the preview of the act the petitioners thought that the matter had come to an injunction section 41 of specific relief act 1963 and order 39 rules 1 2 and 16 of code of civil procedure reliance on an unreported judgment of this court delivered on 21st july 1983 in civil revision application no 112 b 82 fact she has specifically averred that in the month of september 1984 the health of her husband deteriorated and therefore he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Srinivasa Vs. Kuttukaran Machine Tools Ltd.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2009SC2217; 2009(4)AWC3837(SC); JT2009(4)SC440; 2009(4)KarLJ623; 2009(6)MhLJ331(SC); 2009(3)SCALE762; (2009)5SCC182:2009AIRSCW2925:2009(4)AIRKarR148:2009(4)KLJ623.
but since the application was under section 9 of the act for interim measure to secure the interest of the appellant application under section 9 of act of 1996 and order 39 rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of cpc an agreement for sale of the property in dispute on 21st of december 2005 for a sum of rs 6 99 civil judge at bangalore by his order dated 23rd of september 2006 allowed the application filed by the appellant inter alia
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Karn ...
Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1986KAR2451; [1985]60STC361(Kar)
inter state turnover from the assessment completed under the cst act such a notice is without jurisdiction and does not conform the notices issued by the commissioner are justified in law 39 it is not a case of escapement of assessment as under the kst and cst acts by assessment order dated 21st july 1975 by the assistant commissioner of commercial taxes assessment notices purported to be issued under section 12a on 3rd september 1976 and under section 25a on 6th september 1976 by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.P. Civil Liberties Committee (Apclc) Rep. by Its President, Mr. S. S ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2009(1)ALT754
certain fixed objects of public good lord bolingbroke historical writings university of chicago press 1972 the fixed principles of reason bind respondent who is the designated information officer under the information act 2005 rejected the application on 30 08 2007 the petitioner respondents thereupon preferred revision to the high court under section 397 and alternatively under section 482 cr p c the high of offenders at havana cuba during 27th august to 7th september 1999 the united nations principles on the effective prevention and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT