Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the madras inams act 1869 Court: delhi Page 15 of about 2,212 results (0.159 seconds)

Om Prakash Chautala Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... marks for academic qualifications of the candidates (done at the dlsc level prior to holding the interview), yet what is unclear from the case of the prosecution is as to why was there a need for the appellant to carry the above original award lists for holding such meetings when it is culled out conclusively from the documents available on the records that the data which was to be allegedly supplied to the candidates was already available in the form of data entered by hartron from the original application forms which had ..... the aforesaid provisions show that what is required for availing the benefits as per the provisions as contained in the section is; (1) that there must be a trial in the criminal court; (2) person applying to be examined under the provisions of the said provisions would be necessarily an accused; (3) when the stage of invoking the provisions of the said act has reached i.e. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....

M/S. South India Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. General Mills Marketing Inc. ...

Court : Delhi

..... observed: the action for infringement is a statutory remedy conferred on the registered proprietor of a registered trade mark for the vindication of the exclusive right to the use of the trade mark in relation to those goods if the essential features of the trade mark of the plaintiff have been adopted by the defendant, the fact that the get-up, packing and other writing or marks on the goods or on the packets in which he offers his goods for sale show marked differences, or indicate clearly a trade origin different from that of the registered proprietor of the make ..... there is nothing on record to support the conclusion that the word haagen has enjoyed greater prominence or primacy vis- -vis the other elements of the mark in the eyes of the consumers at large or the manufacturer himself and can thus be treated as the dominant element of the respondent-plaintiff s registered trademark. ..... appellant the defendant in the suit, assails the order dated july 23, 2014, allowing the application filed by the respondent - plaintiff under order xxxix rule 1 and 2 of the code of civil procedure granting an interim injunction against the appellant restraining the appellant from using the mark d daazs or any other mark deceptively similar to that of the respondent - plaintiff s trade mark haagen-dazs in relation to ice cream.2. ..... a similar mark causes a slow decline in the accuracy of a consumer s memory-based judgments and therefore, the trademarks act seeks to put a check on such practises. .....

M/S Crocs Inc Usa vs.m/s Bata India Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... in sum and substance, reliance is placed by the defendants upon sub-section (4) of section 22 of the act which provides that even if the registration of the design continues to exist as a registered design under the designs act in favour of the plaintiff, yet the defendants in a suit alleging infringement of a registered design can show that the design which the plaintiff has got registration of was incapable of registration, and consequently, the plaintiff is fao(os)(comm)no.78/2018 & connected matters page 9 of 44 not entitled to seek any relief by filing a suit. ..... size of the perforations/gaps/open spaces, and the hump like protrusion at the front of the footwear, and that there exists a mound above the joint portion of the limb of the foot with the foot, and the designs of the soles are unique, and that when such features are taken as a whole, they have that much amount of visual appeal for the registered designs of the plaintiff s footwear to have that much newness or originality for having been rightly granted registrations under the act. ..... it is argued that the defendants, in a suit filed by the plaintiff of a registered design alleging piracy of the registered design under section 22 of the act, are entitled because of sub- section (4) of the said section 22 of the act to argue that since the registration of the design granted to the plaintiff is not valid hence no case can be made out of piracy of the registered design of the plaintiff. .....

Akash @ Bhole vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... storied house and the only way to reach the terrace of the said house was through the staircase hence there was no occasion for pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased), and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) to witness the alleged act; that the plea of the prosecution that on hearing the cries of the deceased, pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased) and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) witnessed the incident from the tin-sheet on the wooden khokha (hereinafter referred to as khokha ) of the house of pw-6 (father of the deceased), was an afterthought as in the initial site plan ..... prepared by the investigating officer no ladder was shown in the ..... of police madras reported in 2013 10 scc192and c. .....

Manoj vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... storied house and the only way to reach the terrace of the said house was through the staircase hence there was no occasion for pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased), and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) to witness the alleged act; that the plea of the prosecution that on hearing the cries of the deceased, pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased) and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) witnessed the incident from the tin-sheet on the wooden khokha (hereinafter referred to as khokha ) of the house of pw-6 (father of the deceased), was an afterthought as in the initial site plan ..... prepared by the investigating officer no ladder was shown in the ..... of police madras reported in 2013 10 scc192and c. .....

Manoj @ Kale vs.the State

Court : Delhi

..... storied house and the only way to reach the terrace of the said house was through the staircase hence there was no occasion for pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased), and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) to witness the alleged act; that the plea of the prosecution that on hearing the cries of the deceased, pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased) and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) witnessed the incident from the tin-sheet on the wooden khokha (hereinafter referred to as khokha ) of the house of pw-6 (father of the deceased), was an afterthought as in the initial site plan ..... prepared by the investigating officer no ladder was shown in the ..... of police madras reported in 2013 10 scc192and c. .....

Rahul vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... storied house and the only way to reach the terrace of the said house was through the staircase hence there was no occasion for pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased), and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) to witness the alleged act; that the plea of the prosecution that on hearing the cries of the deceased, pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased) and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) witnessed the incident from the tin-sheet on the wooden khokha (hereinafter referred to as khokha ) of the house of pw-6 (father of the deceased), was an afterthought as in the initial site plan ..... prepared by the investigating officer no ladder was shown in the ..... of police madras reported in 2013 10 scc192and c. .....

Arjun vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... storied house and the only way to reach the terrace of the said house was through the staircase hence there was no occasion for pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased), and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) to witness the alleged act; that the plea of the prosecution that on hearing the cries of the deceased, pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased) and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) witnessed the incident from the tin-sheet on the wooden khokha (hereinafter referred to as khokha ) of the house of pw-6 (father of the deceased), was an afterthought as in the initial site plan ..... prepared by the investigating officer no ladder was shown in the ..... of police madras reported in 2013 10 scc192and c. .....

Nandu vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... storied house and the only way to reach the terrace of the said house was through the staircase hence there was no occasion for pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased), and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) to witness the alleged act; that the plea of the prosecution that on hearing the cries of the deceased, pw-6 (father of the deceased), pw-10 (aunt of the deceased) and pw-11 (brother-in-law of deceased) witnessed the incident from the tin-sheet on the wooden khokha (hereinafter referred to as khokha ) of the house of pw-6 (father of the deceased), was an afterthought as in the initial site plan ..... prepared by the investigating officer no ladder was shown in the ..... of police madras reported in 2013 10 scc192and c. .....

Parle Biscuits Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(115)ELT706TriDel

..... jdr had not taken note of the ratio of the madras high court judgment in ponds (india) ltd. ..... 178 (tribunal), in which the tribunal had held, relying on the madras high court judgment in ponds (india) ltd. v. c.c.e. ..... counsel also submits that under section 32 of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1955 and under section 39 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976, it was obligatory for the appellants to put a label on each packet giving trade name, description of goods, name of ingredients used in the product, their composition, weight, volume etc. ..... ld.counsel therefore submits that the matter being fully covered by the earlier decisions of the tribunal and in the facts of the case, the impugned order cannot be sustained. ..... i find that the case law relied on by the ld.counsel for the appellants cover the items in dispute. ..... 603" (tribunal) still held the field and the issue is fully covered by the said final order in favour of revenue.4. ld. ..... (supra) held that printing ink utilised for printing brand name, manufacturer's name etc.on paper bags to identify the contents of the packet are eligible for credit. ..... he submits that though a reference has been made to the hon'ble punjab & haryana high court on the same issue, the final order nos. a. ..... 603 (tribunal) involving the present appellants wherein the very same issue had been considered and the tribunal had held that modvat credit will not be available in case of materials like 'printing ink'. .....