Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the state, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the central government in such matter to accord sanction ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. ..... madras 1966crilj949 where the evidence of the approver contained certain discrepancies and was also contradicted by the testimony of another witness and yet that evidence was held to pass the test of being credible and was accepted as it was also corroborated by other evidence. .....
Tag this Judgment!