Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the madras inams act 1869 Court: andhra pradesh Page 8 of about 954 results (0.129 seconds)

Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Vs. C.V. Narasimha Rao and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(1)ALT516

..... 827/2005 and the appellant in the writ appeals made the following submissions:-the learned counsel had taken this court through the different provisions of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) abolition of inams act, 1955 (in short here-in-after referred to as 'the act') and the andhra pradesh (telangana area) abolition of inams rules, 1975 (in short here-in-after referred to as 'the rules') and would maintain that in the light of the admitted facts, it is clear that the land in question is non-agriculture and hence the revenue divisional officer has no jurisdiction ..... at all to entertain such dispute inasmuch as the land in question for sufficiently a longer .....

B. Chandrasekhar Vs. State of A.P. Through Public Prosecutor, High Cou ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008CriLJ184

..... as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or any corrosive substance, or by means of any explosive substance, or by means of any substance which it is deleterious to the human body to inhale, to swallow, or to receive into the blood, or by means of any animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and also shall liable to fine ..... the madras high court held,the appellant cannot be convicted under section 326, penal code, unless the weapon used by him was deadly and the hurt intended or known to be likely to be ..... .the question raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that either it should be an instrument which is used for shooting, stabbing or cutting or it should be an instrument which is used as a weapon of offence and is likely to cause death and the stick, by no stretch of imagination, could be described as an instrument, if used, as a weapon which was likely to cause ..... the bombay high court held, 'in my view, the only possible ground of or bringing the act of the appellants within the ambit of this section (section 326 ipc) can be that sticks would fall within the expression 'any instrument which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely ..... certain overt acts were also attributed to .....

S.S. Rao Vs. The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Razole Depot and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... it is made clear that what is discussed in the above paragraphs is for the purpose of considering the validity of the order of suspension and shall not prejudice the defense of the petitioner in the disciplinary proceedings. ..... the disciplinary authority therefore assumes that since the bus was in the control of the petitioner and mixing of water would benefit the petitioner, he is responsible for such mixture of water which resulted in damage to the bus and resultant deficiency in provision of service to the passengers. 12. ..... in matters of this nature, employer not only looks at the conduct of employee per se, but in the larger perspective of enforcement of discipline, he would intend to send across a message to the employees that indulging in such illegal activities would not be spared. ..... alleging that petitioner was responsible for mixing of water in hsd oil with an intention to increase the kmpl out put or to cancel the kilometers on the ground of bus failure, amounts to fraudulent nature of the person and that he intended to tarnish the image of the corporation. ..... in support of his contentions, learned counsel placed reliance on the decision rendered by the division bench of this court in w.a.no.1316 of 2014 dated 27.10.2014; and in the deputy general of police, kurnool range and four others vs. ..... the court cannot act as if it is an appellate forum de hors the powers of judicial review. ? 10. .....

S. FakruddIn and Others Etc. Vs. the Govt. of A. P. and Others Etc.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996AP37; 1995(2)ALT439

..... such directions as it may deem necessary to the commissioner under the act, to the district collector or any officer or servant of the government and the panchayat raj institutions so as to ensure efficient conduct of the elections under the act; (2) the preparation of electoral roll for the conduct of all elections under the act shall be done under the supervision and control of the state election commission; (3) for the above purposes the government shall provide the state election commission with such staff as may be necessary; (4) on the request of the state election commission the state government shall ..... place at its disposal such staff of the ..... . row, : 1952crilj966 in the context of the challenge to the validity of criminal law amendment act (1908) (as amended in madras by madras act 11 of 1950) in these words (at p .....

Rci Power Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

..... bound by any policy direction given by the government, anterior to the reforms act since the act did not say/save such policy decisions and the ppas entered into between the generating companies with the then electricity board under the directions of the government cannot restrain the commission from exercising the regulatory power forgetting the fact that even under the reforms act, the state government alone is entitled to take policy decisions on all matters concerning electricity in the state, including the overall planning and coordination. ..... state of madras, : air1959sc725 , their lordships rejected the arguments of the counsel for the respondents that an application under article 32 of the constitution of india is not maintainable by observing that:'there can be no question that the existence of an adequate legal remedy is a thing to be taken into consideration in the matter of granting writs, but the powers given to this court under article 32 are much wider and are not confined to issuing prerogative writs only.' ......... .....

Mir Fazle Ali Nasiri Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD3; 2007(3)ALT187

..... 262, it is stated thus:...it is the duty of courts of justice to try to get at the real intention of the legislature by carefully attending to the whole scope of the statute to be construed'...that in each case you must look to the subject-matter, consider the importance of the provision and the relation of that provision to the general object intended to be secured by the act, and upon a review of the case in that aspect decide whether the enactment is what is called imperative or only directory.10. ..... when the provisions of statute relate to the performance of a public duty and the case is such that to hold null and void acts done in neglect of this duty would work serious general inconvenience or injustice to persons who have no control over those entrusted with the duty and at the same time would not promote the main object of the legislature, it has been the practice of the courts to hold such provisions to be directory only, the neglect of them not affecting the validity of the acts done.in craies on statute law ..... in 2001 fourth respondent herein filed an application before the revenue divisional officer (rdo), chevella, claiming ownership certificate under section 38-e of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1950 (for short 'the tenancy act')- the petitioner alleges that without notice to the petitioner, the rdo, chevella, issued certificate to fourth respondent on 18-2-2006. .....

United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. N. Jagannath and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... it is also the contention from the grounds of appeal and oral submissions that, the quantum of compensation awarded by the tribunal in all the three claims are also excessive and exorbitant, so also rate of interest and the other contentions are award of amounts other than provided and fixed in the ii schedule of the act, for the claim under section 163-a of the act, is untenable and thereby sought to exonerate the insurer or otherwise reduce the compensation by fixing contributory/composite negligence in deciding the appeals covered by the impugned awards of the tribunal, so far ..... as against the owner and insurer concerned .....

Kediya Vanaspati P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1981]51CompCas389(AP)

..... offence by companies - (1) if the person committing an offence under this act is a company, every person who at the time the offence was committed was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company as well as the company shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly : provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any punishment, if he proves that the offence was committed without his ..... (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under this act, has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any director or manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. ..... joseph anthony pereira : (1971)73bomlr613 a case arising under the drugs and cosmetics act, the bombay high court held that a company in no case can be punished with imprisonment. 26. ..... p-10 it is clear that it was a-2 who requested the board to supply electricity in bulk for manufacturer of oil and vanaspathy and has undertaken to comply with all the requirements of the electricity act of 1910, and the electricity supply act, 1948. .....

Media Anasuyamma and Another Vs. Choppela Lakshmamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1992AP183; 1991(1)ALT430

..... holding that the instrument was not admissible under the general stamp act, 1869 as a promissory note, the trial court dismissed the suit. ..... reiterated, that according to the definition of the word 'chargeable' in section 3(5) of the 1879 act and also the word 'duly stamped', to determine whether any penalty is due upon a document executed prior to the act, it is necessary to look to the act in force at the date of 'execution' of the instrument, in order to see whether the document was 'duly stamped' and what is 'chargeable' as duty wholly unpaid or so deficient duty. ..... section 3 deals with instruments chargeable with duty which stales that subject to the provisions of this act and the exemptions contained in schedule i, the following instruments shall be chargeable with the duty of the amount indicated in that schedule as the proper duty therefore, respectively, that is to say :a) every instrument mentioned in that schedule which, not having been previously executed by any person, is executed in india on or after the first day of july, 1899; b) every bill of exchange payable otherwise than on demand or promissory ..... the above view was followed in a subsequent full bench decision of the madras high court in reference understamp act, s. ..... therein, following the judgment of the madras high court in devasikamani v. ..... karuppathan (1881) ilr 3 mad 251, a division bench of the madras high court consisting of innes and muttusami ayyar, jj. .....

Boyapati Koteswararao and anr. Vs. Pappu Veeranna and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas698(AP)

..... gulab chndra gupta, [1986] 59 comp cas 678, the learned judges therein held that inasmuch as under section 96(2) of the motor vehicles act read with section 110d the grounds available to the owner of the vehicles, the appeal is not maintainable jointly by both of them. ..... the court cannot refuse to give this benifit to the insurance company in the connected appeal merely becausee the defences open to the insurance company are not the same as those available to the owner of the vehicle inasmuch as when two appeals arise out of the same petition filed by the injured person, there cannot be inconsistent decrees in the same matter. ..... suppose in the very case, the parties have preferred independent appeals, nothing precludes thecourt form taking up the appeal preferred by the owner of the vehicle at the outset and (if the court comes to thecnclusion that (say) negligence is not made out or that the quantum is liable to be reduced) give relief in those respects to the owner of the vehicle. ..... tata rao contending that a single appeal by the insurance company as well as the owner of the vehicle is not maintainable inas much as the defenes open to each of these appellants are different.for the above said purpose, reliance is placed upon a judgment of a division bench of the allahabad high court in united india fire and general insurance co. ..... the respondent underwent treatment at vijayawada and also at madras, but he was, however, left with a permanent disability as he has to limp. .....