Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the madras inams act 1869 Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 954 results (0.167 seconds)

Tallapakam Venkata Srinivasacharyulu (Died), Per L.Rs. Vs. Tirumala Ti ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT293

..... the definition of 'inam land' in section 2(c) excludes inams constituting an estate under the madras estates land act. ..... major inams fall under the purview of the madras estates land act, 1908. ..... even assuming that it was operating in the mind of the commissioner that the master and servant relationship which is a feature of service jurisprudence was the applicable jural relationship between the institution and the inamdar - the institution being the master and the inamdar being the servant and when such relationship was found to be absent, the observation that the inam was burdened with service loses all its relevance and weight. ..... as certain doubts arose with regard to the enfranchisement, act viii of 1869 was passed to clarify that inam title deed was not meant to define, limit, infringe or destroy the rights of any description of holders or occupiers of land or to affect the interests of any person other than the holder of the inam. ..... the inam commissioner under the provisions of act no.vi of 1862 and act no.iv of 1866, after enquiry, prepared title deeds and as there was considerable confusion as to what was the position of an inamdar whose inam was enfranchised, to clarify the legal position, act no.viii of 1869 was enacted in order to declare the true intent of the aforesaid two acts. .....

Nelluru Sundararamareddi and ors. Vs. State of Andhra (Now Andhra Prad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959AP215

..... to be decided by the settlement officer on the material gathered at the enquiry -- whether such ..... , who spoke for the majority of the full bench said:--'i am of the view that in proceedings under section 9 of the abolition act before the settlement officer, whether they were initiated suo motu or on an application by any person interested, the question whether a given inam village was an estate as defined in section 3(2) (d) of the madras estates land act read with explanation i thereto, and the question, should it arise, whether the minor inams in the said village were granted before or after the grant of the major inam where the major grant was of the village as such, have .....

Ayudhanula Venkata Ramamurty and ors. Vs. V. Venkatarao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1972AP212

..... it is evident that by making the provision in section 4 (2) (b) of the inams abolition act, the legislature wanted also to benefit the tenants of those inam villages which have not come under the scope of the madras estates abolition act, by conferring on them the right to get a ryotwari patta for a two-thirds share in the inam lands which are under their cultivation. ..... the object of the legislature in adopting that definition for the inam village appears to be to confer benefit also on the ryots in those inam villages which have escaped abolition under the madras estates land act, having not attracted the definition of inam estate as defined under section 3 (2) (d) of the madras estates land act. ..... what was held in that case has been correctly brought out in the head note of the report which is a follows:'revenue accounts' has been used in the inams abolition act and in the madras estates land act in comprehensive sense so as to include accounts and also registers that were prescribed to be maintained by the board of revenue or other authorities pursuant to the karnams regulation and the subsequent enactments. ..... ,(i) inam village which have not been attracted by the provisions of the madras estates (abolition and conversion into ryotwari) act and (2) those which were attracted by that act and were notified and taken over by the government under the provisions of that act. .....

Gajuwaka Gram Panchayat, Rep. by the Executive Officer Vs. Medisetti V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT113

..... the learned judge considered the fact that under the very definition of 'inam' under the inams abolition act, any land which was estate under the madras estates land act, 1908 was excluded from being inam and that a mokhasa land, which was explained as jagir land in the commentary of sundararaja ayyangar's text book on land tenure in the madras presidency, was excluded from the purview of the inams abolition act.4. ..... in the state government and the district collector, being the authorised person to permit the gram panchayat to construct upon the land, the non-impleading of the state government as party to the suit makes the suit had for non-joinder of necessary party; thirdly that the civil court has no jurisdiction to decide the nature or tenure of the land as it is inam land, the question is solely entrusted to the tahsildar under the inams abolition act; fourthly that the plaintiffs had not obtained ryotwari patta either under the inams abolition act or under the estates abolition act and .....

Nammi Venkata Swamy and ors. Vs. Nodagala Sanyasi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(5)ALD143; 2008(5)ALT455

..... of 'inam' under the inams abolition act, any land which was estate under the madras estates land act, 1908 was excluded from being inam and that a mokhasa land, which was explained as jagir land in the commentary of sundararaja ayyangar's text book on land tenure in the madras presidency, was excluded from the purview of the inams abolition act.while this question being considered, the third submission urged by the learned counsel for the appellant may be taken together with it. it is undoubtedly true that section 14 of the inams abolition act ousts the jurisdiction of ..... the civil court to set aside or modify any decision of the tahsildar, the revenue court or the collector under that act unless the decision has been obtained by .....

V. Tirupathirayudu and anr. Vs. M. Venkatacharyulu and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955AP240

..... (10) the tribunal held that the village is not an estate by reason of the fact that there were separate title-deeds issued in respect of the main inam grant and the other inams evidently having in mind the decision of the madras high court in -- ' ..... (8) tribunals acting under the provisions of the madras estates abolition act should, and are bround to follow the decisions of the high court, especially when those decisions determine the tenure of the very village which the tribunal has to ..... this decision by a bench of the madras high court, which has determined the tenure of vaddimukkala agraharam, which is also the subject-matter for decision in this writ, i hold that the agraharam is not an 'inam estate' within the meaning of s. ..... considered the question as to whether the sell - same vaddimukkala agraharam is an estate before the madras estates land third amendment act (18 of ..... so, the provisions of the madras estates abolition act do not apply to the agraharam ..... a consideration of the material evidence before him the inam settlement officer came to the conclusion that the agraharam became an 'estate' only by virtue of act 18 of 1936 and that it is not an inam estate within the meaning of s ..... (2) (d) of madras act 1 of 1908 and much less an 'inam estate' within the meaning of s. ..... as follows :'vaddimukkala agraharam wherein these lands are situated, was only an inam village, not falling within the definition of an 'estate' till the third amendment to the estate land act was passed in 1936. .....

T. Santosh Kumar and Ano Vs. the Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar and Ot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... learned counsel also pointed out that apart from these revisions, the appeal field by the petitioners, against the grant of occupancy certificate in favour of rama rao, before joint collector, who, apart from being the revisional authority under section 9 of the ror act, is also the appellate authority under the inams act, was kept pending without disposal whereas the revision petitions were disposed of. ..... it is also well settled that grant of occupancy certificate under the inams act amounts to grant and recognition of title of the holder with respect to the land covered by the said certificate and based on such certificate, the holder of the occupancy certificate would be entitled to have his name recorded in the revenue record, as pattadar of the land so covered by the certificate.6. ..... while the scope of the present writ petitions is evidently the common order of the joint collector, which is impugned, passed under the ror act, for the moment the facts and proceedings arising out of the inams act do not directly arise for consideration herein. ..... raghuveer rao, was granted occupancy certificate under the andhra pradesh (telangana area) abolition of inams act, 1955 (for short inams act) in proceedings no.k/4439/87 dated 19.12.1987 covering sy.nos.727 (ac.7.15 guntas); 731 (ac.16.09 guntas) and 734 (ac.8.21 guntas) guntas at keshampet village and mandal, mahabubnagar. .....

C. Manohar Reddy and ors. Vs. Alopi Shanker and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD496; 2007(3)ALT40

..... a contract of sale is recognized under section 55(1) of the transfer of property act as well as under section 13 of the specific relief act.sub-clauses (a) to (g) of section 55(1) of the transfer of property act empowers the purchaser to demand from the seller, various documents and information relating to the title and the seller is bound to satisfy the purchaser about all the aspects covered under section 55(1)(a) to (g) of the transfer of property act and that similarly section 13(1)(a) to (d) of the specific relief act also entitles the purchaser to enforce the contract and compel the vendor to procure concurrence or conveyance from other ..... rambai and that after abolition of inams, the defendants obtained the 'occupancy certificate' under the provisions of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) abolition of inams act and thus the defendants are the owners and possessors of the lands and that when sri k. ..... in this regard, a decision of the madras high court in madhurai chetty v. .....

Valluri Appayya and ors. Vs. Dosapati Narasimhamurty and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1976AP295

..... the defendants were therefore estopped from contending that the lands are situate within a whole inam village and that therefore it is an estate within the meaning of section 3 (2) (d)of the madras estates act and that since they were not parties to the suit o.s. no. ..... it is well established by the several decisions of the privy council, madras high court and this court that the preparations of the said inam fair register was a great act of state and that the said register was prepared by the government officials after conducting an enquiry on the spot and after examining all the relevant and available documents. ..... the main question that fell for decision in the suit therefore was whether the suit land is an estate within the meaning of section 3 (2) (d) of the madras estates land act.3. ..... then the patta nakalu was referred to and since it was already held to be admissible in evidence by parthasarathi, j, it was acted upon and on that basis held that the inam consists of two separate grants relating to the same village or agraharam and for that reason, the suit lands are not situated within an estate within the meaning of section 3 (2) (d) of the act and allowed the appeal. ..... the said agraharam is a pre-settlement minor inam and that when the rent reduction act was enforced by the state, the defendants stopped paying the rent whereupon the plaintiffs filed suit o.s. no. .....

K.S. Lakshminarasimhachar and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1974AP63

..... to put it differently, while it is clear that the decision was given by the settlement officer under section 9 of the act before the commencement of act xviii of 1957 and that the decision regarding the village was that it was not an inam estate as it stood before the commencement of act xviii of 1957, the decision clearly is not based on the finding that the inam village 'became an estate by virtue of the madras estates land act (xviii of 1936). ..... secondly , such a decision must be in respect of any village that it was not an inam estate as it stood before the commencement of the act xviii of 1957, and thirdly , that such a decision must have been based on the finding that the inam village became an estate by virtue of the madras estates land (third amendment) act xviii of 1936. ..... the result of this was that inam village which by virtue the madras estates land (third amendment) act xviii of 1936 had become an estate was also brought within the purview of the estates abolition act.6. ..... after a proper inquiry, the settlement officer by his order dated 28-1-1950 reached the conclusion that the grant was of a whole village within the meaning of section 3 (2) (d) of the madras estates land act. .....