The Kerala Farmers Debt Relief Commission Amendment Act 2008 - Judgment Search Results

Jayant Verma . Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

for the relief of indebted agriculturists in the state of kerala is within the competence of the state legislature clause 1 the adverse credit policies of the financial institutions which compel farmers to starve under the burden of loans and commit suicides was faced with the constitutional validity of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act 1993 in repelling ii with entry 45 list i is to say that relief of agricultural indebtedness will not include indebtedness to banks he payment in the manner as may be directed by the commission and on payment of the same in the manner directed activities of the centre and the provinces therefore commend my amendment for the earnest consideration of the house i mr president remove agricultural indebtedness the problem cannot be solved merely by action taken by individual states only a comprehensive plan and its

The Alakode Service Co-op.Bank Ltd.No.C Vs. the Joint Registrar of Co- ...

Court: Kerala

application or were farmers coming under the definition of the kerala farmers debt relief commission act this court finds that there co operative societies should not be so harsh to poor farmers and try to help them to survive in these difficult the members who had approached the commission with applications for debt relief as provided under the act and rules the learned no limitation provided for filing an application before the debt relief commission it cannot for a moment be assumed that a limitation provided for filing an application before the debt relief commission it cannot for a moment be assumed that a farmer necessarily a relief sought for under the provisions of the act would have to be made within a reasonable time of members under the agriculture debt waiver and debt relief scheme 2008 8 the petitioners challenge ext p10 on the ground that

Abdullakutty Vs. Sale Officer

Court: Kerala

particular period with respect to the contention based on the kerala farmers debt release commission act 2006 the learned counsel would period with respect to the contention based on the kerala farmers debt release commission act 2006 the learned counsel would submit to approach the appropriate authority under the kerala farmer s debt relief commission act if so advised sd k vinod chandran the same however it is prayed that if such a relief is granted the same may be limited to a particular the appropriate authority under the kerala farmer s debt relief commission act if so advised sd k vinod chandran judge jma the contention based on the kerala farmers debt release commission act 2006 the learned counsel would submit that it is not

K.Avara Hajee Vs. the General Manager

Court: Kerala

meantime the petitioner also approached the commission constituted under the kerala farmers debt relief commission act and rules seeking the benefit the petitioner also approached the commission constituted under the kerala farmers debt relief commission act and rules seeking the benefit under ext p3 true coy of the agricultural debt waiver and debt relief scheme 2008 vide no rbi 2007 2008 330 dated commission act and rules seeking the benefit under the debt relief scheme as requested by the petitioner which is the subject in so far as the petitioner had already approached the commission constituted under section 3 of the kerala farmers debt relief the commission constituted under the kerala farmers debt relief commission act and rules seeking the benefit under the debt relief scheme ext p8 true copy of the communication dated 31 10 2008 issued by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner ext p9

Beena Mohanan Vs. the Melukavu Housing Co-op. Society

Court: Kerala

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present the honourable mr justice k vinod chandran order dated223 2010 of the final order of the kerala farmers debt relief commission true copy p a to judge k of order dated242 2009 passed by the kerala state farmers debt relief commission ext p 2 true copy of receipt dated163 2010 of the final order of the kerala farmers debt relief commission true copy p a to judge k vinod chandran dated242 2009 passed by the kerala state farmers debt relief commission ext p 2 true copy of receipt dated163 2009 ext

Rajan Nair Vs. Panangad Service Co-operative Bank

Court: Kerala

secretary p o panangad koyilandy taluk kozhikode dist 2 the kerala farmers debt relief commission rep by the secretary thiruvananthapuram 69 p o panangad koyilandy taluk kozhikode dist 2 the kerala farmers debt relief commission rep by the secretary thiruvananthapuram 69 o panangad koyilandy taluk kozhikode dist 2 the kerala farmers debt relief commission rep by the secretary thiruvananthapuram 69 panangad koyilandy taluk kozhikode dist 2 the kerala farmers debt relief commission rep by the secretary thiruvananthapuram 69 koyilandy taluk kozhikode dist 2 the kerala farmers debt relief commission rep by the secretary thiruvananthapuram 69 of 2011 t against the order judgment in ep 112 2008 of sub court quilandy dated 00 00 0000 petitioner rajan

Pathumma and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC771; (1978)2SCC1; [1978]2SCR537

the level of debt per household is comparatively low in kerala and so is the cost of cultivation and yet the them unable to pay high interest and the principal the farmers even lose their land or live from generation to generation not withstanding that the sale has been confirmed such judgment debtor or the legal representative of such judgment debtor may deposit maharashtra etc 1977 2scr828 the constitutionality of the maharashtra debt relief act 1976 which contained similar or rather harsher provisions as been decided by this court in navinchandra mafatlal v the commissioner of income tax bombay city 1954 26itr758 sc that in not have in our constitution any provision like the ninth amendment nor are we at liberty to apply the test of etc 1977 2scr828 the constitutionality of the maharashtra debt relief act 1976 which contained similar or rather harsher provisions as the

State of Tamil Nadu and Others Vs. M/S. Sanjeetha Trading Co. and Othe ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC237; 1992(2)SCALE635; (1993)1SCC236; [1992]Supp1SCR840

k modu v food inspector kozhikode i l r 1961 kerala 639 doubted the notification not being law was not saved make a report thereunder could not be delegated by the commissioner nor could he consider such a report when made held has to be held that the prohibition introduced by the amendment on movement and transport of timber amounts to restriction 10 control order has been made under section 3 of the act which vests power in the state government for maintaining increasing

Shivshankar Shivram Singh and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra Through ...

Court: Mumbai

judgment 4 the petitioners in this petition seek the following reliefs a that this hon ble court be pleased to issue acquired land as scheduled below vide order of the deputy commissioner kamrup s ulc case no 343 dated 2 3 1991 owners render all the steps and measures under the principal act negatory that would defeat the purpose of the principal act fixing the compensation and the petitioners reply dated 29th february 2008 it appears that respondent no 3 called for the report

State of Gujarat Vs. Vora Fiddali BadruddIn Mithibarwala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1964SC1043; [1964]6SCR461

the shiledari service it could not be mortgaged for a debt of any banker and if a decree holder sought to suit no 115 of 1950 for an injunction and ancillary reliefs to restrain the appellant and its officers from interfering with florida under the terms of this act of the congress commissioners were set up to investigate claims by private individuals to law the legislative power is the power to make alter amend or repeal laws and within certain definite limits to delegate title which he continued to possess and enjoy until by action of the succeeding ruler the same was revoked or repudiated