Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the karaikal pannaiyal protection act 1966 Page 1 of about 6,578 results (0.406 seconds)

Nov 30 2022 (HC)

Shahistha Vs. The State

Court : Karnataka

..... even under section 35 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015, provides that (1) a parent or guardian, who for physical, emotional and social factors beyond their control, wishes to surrender a child, shall produce the child before the committee; (2) if, after prescribed process of inquiry and counseling, the committee is satisfied, a - 16 - mfa no.4617 of 2022 surrender deed shall be executed by the parent or guardian, as the case may be, before the committee, and (3) the parents or guardian who surrendered the child, shall be given ..... two months time to reconsider their decision and in the ..... when the state government is providing so many benefits for the welfare of the society, that too, for the people below the poverty and section 35 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2015, clearly explains regarding surrender of the child, the agreement entered into between appellant nos.1 and 2 and appellant nos.3 and 4 cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2010 (HC)

M/S.Rajam Industries (P) Ltd., Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, ...

Court : Chennai

..... that was a case where municipal tax and cess payable for the goods supplied from a company as per the provisions of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949 in respect of two factories of the said company situated at aurangabad and kharghar which are outside the jurisdiction of the city limits of navi mumbai and within the territorial jurisdiction of the bombay municipal corporation in respect of which supplies were directly made to the dealers and the corporation gave a direction to the appellant establishment at kalwe to pay tax. ..... further, when the court passes an interim order it should be careful to see that the statutory functionaries specially and specifically constituted for the purpose are not denuded of powers and authority to initially decide the matter and ensure that ultimate relief which may or may not be finally granted in the writ petition is not accorded to the writ petitioner even at the threshold by the interim protection not granted.52. ..... after receiving the explanation of the respondent and the objections of the appellant to the said explanation of the respondent and the rejoinder of the respondent, if any thereto, the central government will give a hearing to the respondent and to the appellant, and will pass a reasoned order and submit the same to this court within four months from today, after communicating the same to the appellant and the respondent and the state of haryana. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 1974 (HC)

Arumugha Gounder Vs. Ardhanari Mudaliar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1975Mad231

..... they were of opinion that a receiver virtually represented the real owner of the property in his possession, and that he would, therefore, be the owner for the time being of the property and would fall within the definition of "land owner" in section 2 (a) of the tanjore pannaiyal protection act. ..... those respondents filed an application under section 6(2) of the tanjore pannaiyal protection act successfully and possession was restored to them. ..... raiagopala pandaravar, (1956) 1 mad lj 34 which was concerned with a tenant under the tanjore pannaiyal protection act. ..... he pointed out that a lessee from a receiver who was authorised to lease the property for a limited period during the pendency of certain proceedings or from a guardian during the period of his guardianship subject to the directions of the court, could not obtain the benefits of the cultivating tenants protection act, unless the court by appropriate directions conferred by its order such benefit at the time of granting the lease. ..... this reference raises an interesting question as to whether a tenant let into possession of land and incidental immovable property by a receiver appointed by court pending a suit would be entitled to protection under the tamil nadu cultivating tenants protection act, the suit was brought by the tenant for an injunction, out of which the second appeal arises. ..... 13684 of 1966 dismissed. c. m. ps. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1979 (SC)

Swaran Lata Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1979)ILLJ273SC; (1979)3SCC165; [1979]2SCR953

..... the main argument advanced by the counsel for the appellant, can be conveniently considered under two heads: the first branch of his contention is, that in terms of the instructions issued by the central government under section 84 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966, the post of principal of the institute was 'deputation post' and, therefore, the chandigarh administration had no authority to fill up the post by direct recruitment through union public service commission. ..... it seems to us that for a proper determination of the question, it is necessary first of all to formulate as clearly as possible the precise nature and the effect of the directions issued by the central government under section 84 of the punjab re-organisation act, 1966, which reads:84. ..... prem lata dewan by the chandigarh administration to the post of principal, government central crafts institute for women, chandigarh, by direct recruitment through the union public service commission was invalid, as being contrary to the directions issued by the central government under section 84 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966.2. ..... the state of punjab : (1966)illj458sc this court laid down that he who seeks to invalidate or nullify any act for order, must establish the charge of bad faith and abuse or misuse by government of its powers. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2002 (HC)

Ms. Geetika Panwar and Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. G ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2003Delhi317

..... . as a result of the discussion aforementioned, we are of the view that the legislature assembly of the national capital territory of delhi was not competent to pass the impugned legislation affecting the pecuniary jurisdiction of the high court as contained in section 5(2) of the delhi high court act, 1966 and the consequent amendment made to section 25 of the punjab courts act, 1918, which has also the effect of limiting the pecuniary jurisdiction of the high court must fall ..... . it was urged that since amendments had earlier been carried out to sub-section (3) of section 5 of the delhi high court act, 1966 by the parliament, the impugned legislature made by the legislative assembly of national capital territory of delhi, which had ben reserved for the consideration of the president and had also received his assent is to prevail by virtue of first proviso to sub-clause (c) of clause (3) ..... . 1 having been answered in the affirmative, the second point is also answered holding section 2 of the delhi high court (amendment), act, 2001 amending sub-section (2) of section 5 of the delhi high court act, 1966 (26 of 1966) and that part of section 3 of delhi high court (amendment) act, 2001 by which section 25 of the punjab courts act, 1918 has been amended as ultra vires, of the legislative assembly of national capital ..... result of the enactments being referable to entry 11-a, the same having received presidential assent would clearly be a law entitled to protection under article 254 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1990 (HC)

Advocate General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Rachapudi Subba Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1991CriLJ613

..... , dealing with an identical question, after noticing the relevant provisions in the constitution of india, the indian penal code, the criminal procedure code, the judicial officers' protection act and the contempt of courts act, came to the conclusion that : '...... ..... a judge is concerned, the judicial officers' protection act, 1850 grants immunity for any act done or ordered to be done by him in good faith in the discharge of his official duty, whether or not the act committed by him was within the limits of his jurisdiction. ..... courts and inferior courts, a notable change was brought about in regard to their liability, both civil and criminal, for acts committed or purported to have been committed by them in the discharge of their judicial functions, by the judges (protection) act, 1985 enacted by parliament. by s. ..... the sanction of the government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction - (a) in the case of a person, who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of the union, of the central government; (b) in the case of a person, who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of a state, of the ..... seshagiri rao, (1966 cri lj 642) (ap) ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2010 (HC)

K. Karehanumaiah S/O Late Thammayanna and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Governmen ...

Court : Karnataka

..... public hearings stated to have been held in the districts of [bangalore urban, bangalore rural, mandya and mysore as required under the environmental (protection) act, 1966. ..... may be mentioned in the report and project shall be allowed to be completed as per ..... after recording the submissions made by the learned advocate general of the state that all possible steps have been taken to implement the project and to act in compliance with the judgment of this court and that the state government shall constitute a committee to be headed by the chief minister of the state of karnataka for the purpose of implementation of the project in question which will submit a report by 22.11.2009 as to allotment and possession of lands for completion of the project and such steps can be taken within the time that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1991 (HC)

Lotika Vardarajan and ors. Vs. the Jawahar Lal Nehru University and or ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1991Delhi78

..... (26) our attention has been invited by the learned counsel for the petitioners to section 30 of the jawaharlal nehru university act,1966 which petitions to removal of teachers on on allegations of misconduct, and he urges us. ..... however, they are governed by the provisions of jawaharlal nehru university act, 1966 and the ordinance there under. ..... besides on account of the unsatisfactory functioning of the school, the then vice chancellor and the rector who is now the acting vice chancellor of the university were closely watching the work of all the petitioners and the said school. ..... and others : air1972sc873 their lordships of the supreme court had an occasion to consider the question as to whether a person who is appointed as a probationer in a post, where the period of probation is specified, acquires confirmation automatically after the expiry of the said period and in this connection it was observed as follows:9.....where a person is appointed as a probationer in any post and the period of probation is specified, it does not follow that at the end of the said specified period of probation the obtains confirmation automatically even if no order is passed in that ..... (10) at the outset we may point out that the petitioners are not entitled to the protection of article 311(2) of the constitution being employees of the respondent university. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1992 (SC)

M. Ramasamy Pillai (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. the Hazarath Syed Shah Mian Sakk ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC2295; JT1992(5)SC359; (1993)1MLJ35(SC); 1992(2)SCALE449; (1992)4SCC731; [1992]Supp1SCR383; 1992(2)LC576(SC)

..... the defendant also filed a separate petition under section 9 of the madras city tenants' protection act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') on 6.11.1967 and prayed for fixing a price for the suit site and to convey the property on payment of the price to be fixed by the court ..... it was also pleaded that even if the tenant was found entitled to the benefits of the city tenants' protection act, he can claim the benefit only so far as the residential portion in the back side was concerned and not in respect of the entire property. ..... the only reason given for denying the benefit of section 9 of the city tenant's protection act by the high court to the appellant is that while executing the lease deed exhibit a ..... the defendant also took the plea that under the madras city tenants protection act, it was open to the tenant to claim compensation or pray for conveyance of the site on a price to be fixed by the court ..... in para 10, it was stated as under:as the defendant has specifically undertaken in the rent deed to surrender vacant possession of the site after the expiry of the lease period and as he is now holding over on the same terms, with the consent of the plaintiff-thaikal, he has no right to refuse to deliver vacant possession of the site to the plaintiff-thaikal whenever called upon to do so, particularly when the plaintiff-thaikal requires the site for raising pucca terraced structures thereon.8. ..... till october, 1966 the superstructure was made up of mud walls and thatched roofing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1996 (SC)

Dr. D.C. Saxena, Contemnor Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996VAD(SC)404; AIR1996SC2481; 1996CriLJ3274; JT1996(6)SC529; 1996(5)SCALE233; (1996)5SCC216; [1996]Supp3SCR677

..... the protection of article 124(4) 121 211, the judicial officers protection act and the judges (protection) act is to ensure independence to the judiciary. ..... cognizant to this tendency, the found in fathers of the constitution engrafted articles 121 and 211 of the constitution and prohibited the parliament and the legislatures to discuss on the floor of the house the conduct of any judge of the supreme court or the high court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting address to the president praying for the removal of a judge under article 124(4) of the constitution in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the judges (inquiry) act, 1968 and the rules made thereunder. in a.m. ..... the punishment is inflicted, not for the purpose of protecting either the court as a whole or the individual judges of the court from a repetition of the attack, but of protecting the public, and especially those who either voluntarily or by compulsion are subject to the jurisdiction of the court, from the mischief they will incur if the authority of the tribunal is undermined or impaired. ..... article 19 of the international covenant on civil and political rights, 1966 to which india is a signatory and had ratified, provides that everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression, to receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds but clause (3) thereof imposes corresponding duty on the exercise of the right and responsibilities. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //