Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the dev sanskriti vishwavidyalaya first amendment act 2002 Page 1 of about 131 results (0.138 seconds)

Dr. Mohammad Tahir Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1406

..... 19 of 1987) hereinafter referred to as (the amendment act 2), has made applicable the first statutes of the university of gorakhpur which was in force immediately before the establishment of the purvanchal university, to the purvanchal university (which was established on 2nd october, 1987) and any amendments and modifications made in the first statutes of the university of gorakhpur subsequent to that date will not be applicable to the purvanchal university unless and until the state government, by notification, provides. ..... . vasantrao and others : [2002]supp2scr636 , the hon'ble supreme court was considering the question as to whether the provisions of the land acquisition act, 1894, particularly sections 6, 23(2) and 28 thereof, stand incorporated in the three states act, namely, the punjab town improvement act, 1922, the nagpur improvement trust act, 1936 and the u.p .....

Vipul Gupta (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary, Medical Educati ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC3070

..... kanpur with effect from the date of commencement of the uttar pradesh state universities (amendment) act, 1997], or meerut (which shall from january 17, 1994 be called chaudhary charan singh university, meerut] or the sampurnanand sanskrit vishwawidyalaya, as the case may be;'institute' means an institute established by the university under section 44;'management' in relation to an affiliated or associated college, means the managing committee or other body charged with managing the affairs of that college and recognised as such by the university;[provided that in ..... studies referred to in section 18-b;]'constituent college' means an institution maintained by the university or by the state government and named as such by the statutes;'existing university' means the university of lucknow, allahabad, agra [which shall from september 24, 1995 be called doctor bhimrao ambedkar university, agra], gorakhpur, [which shall with effect from the date of commencement of the uttar pradesh state universities (second amendment) act, 1997 be called deen dayal upadhaya gorakhpur university, gorakhpur] kanpur [which shall ..... union of india, had for the first time taken initiative with intention to strengthen the national integration and assimilation of peoples from one part of country to the other part and directed to hold the entrance test of graduate and post graduate medical ..... the apex court while deprecating the 100 per cent institutional reservation, in the case reported in 2002 (1) scc 428, .....

Dr.T.Arutselvam. Vs. Nagapattinam Co-operative.

Court : Chennai

..... despite the fact that the indian medicine central council act came into force only in 1971 (and 1976), chapter-ii-a containing sections 13a, 13b and 13c were inserted in the act only by the indian medicine central council (amendment) act, 2002, published in the government gazette on 9.12.2002 and enforced from 28.1.2003. ..... since section 13-c came into force only with effect from 28.1.2003/7.11.2003 by the two amendment acts of 2002 and 2003, the regulations defined an existing medical college to mean a medical college established on or before 7.11.2003. ..... in response to the said communication and in pursuance of the order passed by this court, the first respondent has issued the impugned order dated 20.1.2012, refusing to grant permission for the admission of students for the under graduate as well as the post graduate courses for the academic year 2011-2012. ..... the decisions in guru nanak dev university and central board of secondary education, are also relied upon for the purpose of showing that loose, ill-conceived sympathy masquerades as interlocutory justice exposing judicial discretion to the criticism of degenerating into private benevolence. ..... government of andhra pradesh {1986 (2) scc 667}(vi) guru nanak dev university vs. .....

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

..... the act has been enacted by parliament in exercise of the powers vested in it under article 323a which was brought into the constitution by the 42nd amendment act in 1977. ..... 'the object of the first amendment was to bring arts. ..... it is contended:--(i) firstly, that in view of the provision of the central administrative tribunal act, the present writ petition was not maintainable as the employees of the respondent-union territory administration, as the petitioners, are subject to the jurisdiction of the central administrative tribunal; and(ii) secondly, that as the petitioners have asked for a mere declaration no relief can be granted to them under the provisions of article 226 of the constitution of india.11. ..... the first preliminary objection taken by the respondents during the course of arguments is that since the petitioners are employees of the union territory administration they should approach the central administrative tribunal constituted under the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (hereinafter called the act) for the redressal of their grievances and that in view of the bar contained in section 28 of the act, the writ petitions are not maintainable. ..... the first question is as to the maintainability of the writ petition before this court, the second is whether a mere declaration without the consequential relief can be granted by this court, and the third is whether the impugned rule 5 of chapter vii(ii) of the punjab university calendar is constitutionally valid. .....

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

..... prior to the constitution (fiftieth amendment) act, 1984, article 33 provided as follows:'33. ..... the learned counsel for the respondents (additional solicitor general) pin pointed namely two things; first was that the officers themselves had admitted their guilt; the second was that the records would show that the officers were involved in espionage activities and the orders passed by the respondents are not subject to judicial review.129. ..... first is that the petitioner had informed about orbt of 20 infantry division and 57 mountain division in 1967 and this was an offence under section 69 of the army act, 1950 read with section 3(1)(c) of the official secrets act, 1923. ..... the first court of inquiry was dissolved as the military intelligence authorities did not get the result which it wanted.16. ..... on 4.6.1979 for the first time he was informed that he was kept under detention for having visited pakistan along with capt. a.k. ..... on 1.10.1979 the first summary of evidence was completed. ..... midha are to be noticed in the first instance. ..... in the first instance, he served as an artillery officer. ..... the appellant was directed to conduct a short security cadre for officers and jco's of 39 infantry division at samba (9 punjab) from 4th of november, 1977 to first week of december, 1978. .....

Associated Managements of Primary and Secondary Schools in Karnataka V ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2008NOC2790(FB); ILR2008(3)KAR2895; 2008(4)KarLJ593; 2008(4)KLJ593; 2008(5)AIRKarR261; AIR2008NOC2790(FB)

..... to appreciate this contention let us look at the article which is enacted by the constitution vii amendment act 1956, which reads as under:350-a. ..... of primary school from which study of another language in addition to mother-tongue is made obligatory to all the children as part of the general pattern of primary education and(ii) for making the study of kannada compulsory as one of the three languages to be studied by the students at the secondary school level, that is, either as the first language or as one of the two other languages according to the choice of the students.to (1) all children/students whose mother-tongue is kannada and also to linguistic minorities who are permanent ..... were introduced by way of eighty sixth amendment to the constitution in the year 2002, conferring a right on the child and an obligation on the parent of the child regarding primary education. ..... when the parliament expressly stated in the year 1956, by introducing article 350-a in the constitution that the state shall provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups, and when it was amending the constitution in 2002, making free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years, a fundamental right, they did not prescribe the medium of instruction ..... therefore by an order dated 30-8-2002 the impleading application was allowed, kannada development authority was impleaded .....

Chintamani Khuntia and ors. Vs. the State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1994Ori46

..... it is for the first time these rights of the sevaks have been taken away by insertion of some provisions to sections 28-b and 28-c of the 1983 amendment act.22. ..... it has been next argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that assuming that the beneficial enjoyment of the sevaks are severable from the religious services rendered by them, their right to appropriate a share out of the 'bheta' and 'pindika' would constitute 'property' and, therefore, the same cannot be taken away or abolished by 1983 amendment act, which would be hit by article 300a of the constitution of india. ..... the writ application has been filed by two groups of sevaks of lord jagannath at puri challenging the constitutional validity of sections 28-b(5) and 28-c(5)(a) and 28-c(9) inserted to the jagannath temple act by jagannath temple (amendment) act, 1983 (hereinafter called 'the amendment act') and for declaring the same as ultra vires being hit by articles 14, 25, 26 and 300a of the constitution of india.2. ..... while considering the constitutionality of sri jagannath temple act of 1954 their lordships of the supreme court in the case of raja bira kishore dev v. ..... the position of raja of puri was examined by this court in air 1959 orissa 5 ram chandra dev v. .....

Rukmani College of Education Run by Rukmani Educational and Charitable ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2008(1)CTC545; AIR2008Mad127; 2008(3)AIRKarR210(FB); 2008(1)MLJ1217

..... section 10-a of the indian medical council act, as inserted by the indian medical council (amendment) act, 1993, which was the central act enacted by parliament, required permission for establishing new medical colleges in the country 'notwithstanding anything contained' in the said act or any other law for the time being in force. ..... after comparing the central act namely, the aicte act and the state acts namely, the tamil nadu private colleges (regulation) act and the rules framed thereunder and the madras university act, the supreme court found that there was a conflict between and overlapping of the functions of the aicte and that of the university and therefore, to the extent of such inconsistency the provisions of the state acts are inoperative. ..... dhanalakshmi srinivasan educational and charitable trust (supra) and certain orders passed in other cases, held that the first respondent university is duty bound to consider the request of the appellant for grant of affiliation, otherwise the grant of recognition by the competent authorities will be set at naught and directed the first respondent university to consider the request of the appellant for grant of affiliation for the academic years 2002-2003, 2003-2004 after making necessary inspection. ..... it is, keeping in view the provisions of the indraprastha vishwavidyalaya act, 1998 that provisions of section 16 of the ncte act are to be given an interpretation. ..... another decision reported in guru nanak dev university v. .....

Baburao S/O Rajaram Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR625; 2003(1)BomCR401

..... article 15(4) was incorporated by the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951 and the necessity for such an amendment found its place in the case of state of madras v. sm. ..... , : (1994)1scc359 this court held that: (a) in view of the scheme of articles 341 and 342 of the constitution of india, the powers to include or amend any entry of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (amendment) act, 1976 or any orders issued thereunder could be made only by following the procedure laid down in the said articles and the state government on its own cannot amend any such entry. ..... the notification of the president under article 342 of the constitution under the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (amendment) act, 1976, is conclusive and final. ..... reference was also made to two publications -- bharatiya sanskriti kosh, 1974 and the booklet published by the directorate of census operations. ..... the literature like bharatiya sanskriti kosh, manav vishwakosh, district gazetteers of the districts of marathwada as well as vidharba regions and the experts committee's report submitted to the government of maharashtra in 1983 together go to show that there existed a separate and distinct higher castes of rajput, pardeshi and the persons belonging to these castes were addressed as 'thakur'. .....

Eastern Book Company and ors. Vs. D.B. Modak and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC809; 2008(2)ALD1(SC); 2008(56)BLJR181; (2008)1CALLT69(SC); (2008)1CompLJ1(SC); 2008(1)JKJ41[SC]; LC2008(1)56; (2008)1MLJ361(SC); 2008(36)PTC1(SC); 2007(14)SCALE1; 2008AIRSCW49; AIR2008SC809; 2008(1)SCC1; 2008(1)LH(SC)179; 2008(2)ICC206; 2008(4)KCCRSN237

..... then came the copyright (amendment) act, 1983 which made a number of amendments to the act of 1957 and the copyright (amendment) act, 1984 which was mainly introduced with the object to discourage and prevent the widespread piracy prevailing in video films and records. ..... subsist in any work specified in sub-section (1), other than a work to which the provisions of section 40 or section 41, apply, unless - (i) in the case of a published work, the work is first published in india, or where the work is first published outside india, the author is at the date of such publication, or in a case where the author was dead at that date, was at the time of his death, a citizen of india; (ii) in the case of an unpublished work other than a work of architecture, the author is at the date of the making of the work a citizen of india or domiciled in india; and (iii ..... the government is the first owner of copyright in the judgments of the courts as per section 2(k) read with section 17 and section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the act provides that any person wanting to reproduce or publish judgments would not infringe the copyright of the government, but section 52(1)(q)(iv) does not imply that in case a person has expended independent skill, labour and capital on the judgments of the courts to create and publish his version of the judgments, any other person is free to copy that person s version of the judgments, substantially or in its entirely. .....