Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh vidhan sabha sadasya vetan bhatta tatha pension sanshodhan adhiniyam 2011 Page 1 of about 602 results (0.335 seconds)

Apr 17 1998 (SC)

P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. State (Cbi/Spe)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2120; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)157; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)762; 1997(1)BLJR263; 1998CriLJ2930; 1998(3)SCALE53; (1998)4SCC626; [1998]2SCR870

..... section 2(e) covering members of the council of states as well as the house of the people, has been used in section 3 ( ..... our attention to sections 12, 154, and 155 of the representation of the people act, 1951 wherein the expression 'term of office' has been used in relation to a member of the council of state (rajya sabha) and to section 156 and 157 wherein the said expression has been used in relation to a member of the legislative council of the state (vidhan parishad), the learned attorney general has also invited our attention to the provisons of the salary, allowances and pension of members of parliament act, 1954 wherein the expression 'term of office', as defined in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2012 (HC)

Shrikrishna Pandey Vs. Chhattisgarh Vidhan Sabha and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... the government of chhattisgarh, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section 4 of the chhatisgarh atyavashyak sewa sandharan tatha vichhinnata nivraran adhiniyam, 1979 (for short `the act, 1979'), passed an order dated 03.05.2011 declaring the services of the chhattisgarh vidhan sabha sachivalaya as essential services to prohibit refusal to work. ..... the petitioner was the elected president of the chhattisgarh vidhan sabha sachvialaya shashkiya karmachari sangh. ..... challenge in this petition is to the order dated 07.05.2011 (annexure p/1) whereby the petitioner, working as lower division clerk (for short `the ldc') in the vidhan sabha secretariat, has been dismissed from service, under the provisions of chapter ix rule 10 of the chhattisgarh civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1966 (for short "the rules, 1966"). 2. ..... the petitioner has tried to pressurize the government by putting black ribbon on the clothes, during the budget session of the vidhan sabha. ..... the demonstrations and strike comes within the purview of misconduct under the provisions of the chhattisgarh civil services (conduct) rules, 1965. ..... applying the well settled principles of law to the facts of the present case and for the reasons stated hereinabove, the impugned order dated 7.5.2011 (annexure - p/1) is quashed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 1997 (SC)

S.S. Bola and Others Vs. B.D. Sardana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC3127; JT1997(6)SC637; 1997(5)SCALE90; (1997)8SCC522; [1997]Supp2SCR507

..... . it was also contended by the learned counsel that in deciding the constitutionality of the act the court can look into the statement of objects and reasons of the act only when there is ambiguity in the substantive provisions of the act itself, but where there is no ambiguity in the language of the act which declares the intention of the legislature, the court would not be justified in looking to the statement of objects and reasons for the enactment or the affidavit filed by the state government to hold that the legislatures have usurped the judicial power and have ..... . the statement of objects and reasons while introducing the bill in haryana vidhan sabha is extracted hereinbelow in extenso: there were separate rules regulating service conditions and fixation of seniority in the engineering services in pwd, b&r;, public health and pwd irrigation branches ..... . thereafter, the state legislature enacted the madhya pradesh koyala upkar (manyatakaran) adhiniyam, 1964 and validated the levy ..... . state of mysore36 the employees working in the forest service as deputy conservators of forests were governed by the mysore state civil services (regulation of promotion, pay and pension) act, 1973 ..... . the high court had upheld their right, but the karnataka civil services (regulation of promotion, pay and pension) act was amended with retrospective effect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2002 (HC)

Sharique Ali and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT315

..... 2 of 2000 came into existence indicating the amendment in the principal statute and thereafter the amendment was brought into force by way of the madhya pradesh ashaskiya shikshan sanstha (adhyapakon tatha anya karmachariyon ke vetano ka sandaya) sanshodhan adhiniyam, 2000 (act 26 of 2000). ..... has collected a certain sum towards the contributory provident fund of the employee right from the year 1960 and has transferred the same to the pension fund and now at this juncture, after passage of such long span of time, the state government cannot absolve from its responsibilities to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioners, whereas it is the bounden duty of the respondents to pay pension to the petitioners as it has collected the contributions towards c.p.f. ..... it is relevant to mention here that certain other facts which arenecessary to be stated and are available in other writ petitions are that thestate government by order dated 15-12-1992 had extended facility of pension,gratuity, family pension and provident fund to teachers w.e.f. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

The Commissioner Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... consider each of the said application/s keeping in mind the status of the lands as on the date of the preliminary notification and without taking into consideration any developments / improvements / constructions made subsequent to the preliminary notification; 307 iii) the bda shall complete the exercise of considering the applications of the writ petitioners and deciding on the same within an outer limit of six months from today; iv) the bda, upon consideration of the applications shall intimate the writ petitioners about its decision; v) if the bda is of the opinion that the acquisition will ..... 54.1 order dated 2.4.2014 wp no.9097- 9100/2010 & 9103-9106/2010, which reads as follows: order the learned senior advocate shri jayakumar s patil, appearing for the counsel for the respondent bangalore development authority (bda), files a memo, which reads as follows:- memo as per the affidavit of the commissioner of bangalore development authority dated 18.8.2011 and list accompanied the following petition schedule lands are nursery lands. ..... by its secretary department of urban development vidhan soudha bangalore-560 001.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority Vs. The State Of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka

..... consider each of the said application/s keeping in mind the status of the lands as on the date of the preliminary notification and without taking into consideration any developments / improvements / constructions made subsequent to the preliminary notification; 307 iii) the bda shall complete the exercise of considering the applications of the writ petitioners and deciding on the same within an outer limit of six months from today; iv) the bda, upon consideration of the applications shall intimate the writ petitioners about its decision; v) if the bda is of the opinion that the acquisition will ..... 54.1 order dated 2.4.2014 wp no.9097- 9100/2010 & 9103-9106/2010, which reads as follows: order the learned senior advocate shri jayakumar s patil, appearing for the counsel for the respondent bangalore development authority (bda), files a memo, which reads as follows:- memo as per the affidavit of the commissioner of bangalore development authority dated 18.8.2011 and list accompanied the following petition schedule lands are nursery lands. ..... by its secretary department of urban development vidhan soudha bangalore-560 001.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

The Commissioner Vs. The Principal Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... consider each of the said application/s keeping in mind the status of the lands as on the date of the preliminary notification and without taking into consideration any developments / improvements / constructions made subsequent to the preliminary notification; 307 iii) the bda shall complete the exercise of considering the applications of the writ petitioners and deciding on the same within an outer limit of six months from today; iv) the bda, upon consideration of the applications shall intimate the writ petitioners about its decision; v) if the bda is of the opinion that the acquisition will ..... 54.1 order dated 2.4.2014 wp no.9097- 9100/2010 & 9103-9106/2010, which reads as follows: order the learned senior advocate shri jayakumar s patil, appearing for the counsel for the respondent bangalore development authority (bda), files a memo, which reads as follows:- memo as per the affidavit of the commissioner of bangalore development authority dated 18.8.2011 and list accompanied the following petition schedule lands are nursery lands. ..... by its secretary department of urban development vidhan soudha bangalore-560 001.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

The Commissioner, Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... consider each of the said application/s keeping in mind the status of the lands as on the date of the preliminary notification and without taking into consideration any developments / improvements / constructions made subsequent to the preliminary notification; 307 iii) the bda shall complete the exercise of considering the applications of the writ petitioners and deciding on the same within an outer limit of six months from today; iv) the bda, upon consideration of the applications shall intimate the writ petitioners about its decision; v) if the bda is of the opinion that the acquisition will ..... 54.1 order dated 2.4.2014 wp no.9097- 9100/2010 & 9103-9106/2010, which reads as follows: order the learned senior advocate shri jayakumar s patil, appearing for the counsel for the respondent bangalore development authority (bda), files a memo, which reads as follows:- memo as per the affidavit of the commissioner of bangalore development authority dated 18.8.2011 and list accompanied the following petition schedule lands are nursery lands. ..... by its secretary department of urban development vidhan soudha bangalore-560 001.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

The Commissioner Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... consider each of the said application/s keeping in mind the status of the lands as on the date of the preliminary notification and without taking into consideration any developments / improvements / constructions made subsequent to the preliminary notification; 307 iii) the bda shall complete the exercise of considering the applications of the writ petitioners and deciding on the same within an outer limit of six months from today; iv) the bda, upon consideration of the applications shall intimate the writ petitioners about its decision; v) if the bda is of the opinion that the acquisition will ..... 54.1 order dated 2.4.2014 wp no.9097- 9100/2010 & 9103-9106/2010, which reads as follows: order the learned senior advocate shri jayakumar s patil, appearing for the counsel for the respondent bangalore development authority (bda), files a memo, which reads as follows:- memo as per the affidavit of the commissioner of bangalore development authority dated 18.8.2011 and list accompanied the following petition schedule lands are nursery lands. ..... by its secretary department of urban development vidhan soudha bangalore-560 001.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2011 (HC)

D. Sudhakar and Others Vs. D.N. Jeevaraju and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... , bjp; that in order to ensure that the petitioners are prevented from voting in the vidhana sabha on the confidence motion which was scheduled on 11.10.2010 moved by the chief minister, the impugned order came to be passed hurriedly in total disregard to the rule of law on the previous day; that notices of hearing were not at all served on the petitioners, but were pasted on the doors of the rooms allotted to the petitioners in the legislators home; however as an abundant caution, the interim reply was submitted by the petitioners on 9.10.2010 seeking seven days ..... though a memo dated 1.2.2011 was filed on behalf of the speaker depicting the production of record and mentioning that the review being limited, only in certain circumstances the record can be perused, we are of the opinion that appropriate conclusion can be arrived only on perusal of the records. ..... accordingly, the records maintained by the speaker were produced by the advocate appearing for the speaker in the sealed covers on 1.2.2011. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //