Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh private universities establishment and operation amendment act 2006 Page 1 of about 3,958 results (0.411 seconds)

Prakash Chaturvedi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2424; 2006(4)WLC515

..... and the national policy on education updated in 1992 has enjoined on the states the duty to provide quality education.ugc by its 2003 regulation has provided for creating a regulatory mechanism laying down the conditions for the establishment and operation of private universities and for safeguarding the interests of the student community with adequate emphasis on the quality education and to avoid commercialization of higher education etc. ..... lalitha : (2006)iillj93sc , for the proposition that a judgment is not be read as a statute but it must be construed as if it had been rendered in accordance with law.comparing chhatisgarh (amendment) act 2004 and raj as than act 2005:13. ..... facilities adequate foressary for determination and main- contemporary teaching and research;tenance of standards of teaching, ex- (v) purchase equipments, computers,amination and research in the universi- furniture, other mobile and immobileties, assets and infrastructure facilities(b) to ensure that universities have the (other than buildings referred to infreedom to make rules for admissions, clause (iii) above) whorth rupes 20 lacssubject to reservation policy of the gov- of as per the norms of regulating podies,ernment in state of chhattisgarh with whichever is higher, and giveregard to admissions of students be- five years .....

Prof. Yashpal and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2026; 2005(2)ESC129; JT2005(2)SC165; (2005)5SCC420

..... learned counsel has further submitted that the amending act makes it mandatory that the main campus of the university should be situated in the state of chhattisgarh and the regulatory commission has been established which will ensure a foolproof monitoring of all the private universities. ..... section 2(f) of the amended act defines 'off-campus center' which means a center of the university established by it outside the main campus (within or outside the state) operated and maintained as its constituent unit having the university's complement of facilities, faculty and staff. ..... section 2(g) defines 'off-shore campus' and it means a campus of the university established by it outside the country, operated and maintained as its constituent unit, having the university's complement of facilities, faculty and staff. ..... it is also urged that the amending act has a retrospective operation. ..... the regulations have been made with the object of providing for a regulatory mechanism for establishment and operation of private universities and for safeguarding the interests of the student community with adequate emphasis on the quality of education and to avoid commercialization of higher education and also to maintain standards of teaching, research and examination. ..... dhawan has also drawn the attention of the court to certain other provisions of the act which have effect outside the state of chhattisgarh and thereby give the state enactment an extra territorial operation. .....

Dr. Godwiin Samraj D.P. Vs. Dr. M.Abdul Salam

Court : Kerala

..... s.2(f) of the amended act defines "off campus centre" which means a centre of the university established by it outside the main campus (within or outside the state) operated and maintained as its constituent unit having the university's complement of facilities, faculty and staff. ..... s.3(7) says that the object of the university shall be to establish the main campus in chhattisgarh and to have study centres at different places in india and other w.p(c) no.9779 of 2014 -:33. ..... keeping in view the above, i shall be grateful if you kindly use your good offices and take immediate action on the following: to take suitable steps for amending the existing acts made so as to bring the same in conformity with the observations made by the honourable supreme court of india in the case of prof.yaspal and state of chhattisgarh. ..... dhavan has also drawn the attention of the court to certain other provisions of the act which have effect outside the state of chhattisgarh and thereby give the state enactment an extraterritorial operation. ..... this action on the part of the state universities or private universities established by the state governments beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the respective state govt. ..... the impugned act which specifically makes a provision enabling a university to have an off campus centre outside the state is clearly beyond the legislative competence of the chhattisgarh legislature". ..... :- under the state enactment enacted by the state of chhattisgarh. .....

Dr.K.Vijayakumar Vs. The Mahatma Gandhi University

Court : Kerala

..... the power of the university to establish an off-campus centre was examined as follows in paragraph 60:- dr.dhavan has also drawn the attention of the court to certain other provisions of the act which have effect outside the state of chhattisgarh and 27490 & 35231 of 2014 and 1722 of 2015 14 thereby give the state enactment an extraterritorial operation. ..... facts too, ext.p5 public notice was issued on 27.06.2013, by the university cautioning every universities established or incorporated by or under a state government, not to operate outside its territorial jurisdiction under the act and restraining the offering of its programmes through franchise agreements with private coaching institutions, for the purpose of conducting course in distance mode. ..... .yashpal (supra) dealt with the establishment of self financing private universities for higher education. ..... 2 (f) of the amended act defines "off- campus centre" which means a centre of the university established by it outside the main campus (within or outside the state) operated and maintained as its constituent unit having the university's complement of facilities, faculty and staff. ..... the division bench specifically noticed a communication of the ugc to all universities after the pronouncement of the honourable supreme court in prof.yashpal (supra); which deprecated the establishment of private universities of the state governments and the opening up of off-campus study centre in the name of distance education programs, outside the .....

Allahabad College of Engineering and Management Through Its Co-ordinat ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(4)ESC2298

..... section 2(f) of the amended act defines 'off-campus centre' which means a centre of the university established by it outside the main campus (within or outside the state) operated and maintained as its constituent unit having the university's complement of facilities, faculty and staff. ..... by correspondence whether residing within the area of the university or not and have been registered by the university or are women residing within the area of the university and have carried on private studies or our blind and are residing within the area of the university and have carried on private studies; to hold examinations for and to grant the degree of bachelor of arts or commerce or master of arts or commerce to persons residing within the area of the university who have carried on private studies; to lay down the conditions of affiliation or recognition of colleges and to satisfy itself by periodical inspection and otherwise that those conditions are ..... section 3(7) says that the object of the university shall be to establish main campus in chhattisgarh and to have the study centres at different places in india and other countries. ..... the impugned act which specifically makes a provision enabling a university to have an off-campus centre outside the state is clearly beyond the legislative competence of the chhattisgarh legislature.' 50. .....

Vismayas Max Animation Academy Vs. Mahathma Gandhi University

Court : Kerala

..... the salient features of ext.r5(j) are as follows; "b) a university established or incorporated by or under a state act shall operate only within the territorial jurisdiction allotted to it under its act and in no case beyond the territory of the state of its location. ..... it is stated in para 01 of the off campus centres - operations manual that 'the functions of the off campus centres are governed as per the terms and conditions of the mou signed between the university and the centres subject to the provisions of the mg university act, statutes and regulations in force besides the formalities and directions of the government of kerala and its subsequent modifications, if any. ..... it was also observed that as far as the right of the petitioners/students for the private admission/registration within the territorial limits of the university is concerned, it is always open for them to approach the university for appropriate orders. ..... in the year 2009, the ugc addressed letter to all the state governments to amend the state acts in tune with the judgment in prof.yashpal's case (cited supra). ..... state of chhattisgarh [(2005) 5 scc420, interdicting the setting up of study centres outside the territorial jurisdiction of the concerned university. .....

Canam Technologies Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)MPHT40

..... section 2(f) of the amended act defines 'off-campus centre' which means a centre of the university established by it outside the main campus (within or outside the state) operated and maintained as its constituent unit having the university's complement of facilities, faculty and staff. ..... , dec-guidelines, 2006 for regulating the establishment and operation of open and distance learning institutions in india. ..... the distance education council vide letter dated 3-1-2006 and 5-1-2006 had issued some directions in the light of the judgment of the supreme court that the state open universities cannot set up study centres out of their respective stales and their jurisdiction is within the state and hence, the state open universities should not establish study centres outside their territorial jurisdiction. ..... in paragraph 63 repelled the contention of the learned counsel for the state of chhattisgarh who had submitted that main campus of the university would be situated in the state of chhattisgarh and regulatory commission has been established which will ensure a full proof monitoring of all the private universities. ..... 3 and 5, the ignou and the distance education council of the said university to restrain itself in the programme carried out by the second respondent and further to issue a command to the second respondent, bhoj (open) university to permit fresh admission and to enroll the students for the academic sessions 2006-2007.10. .....

Prachi Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... dec- guidelines, 2006 for regulating the establishment and operation of open and distance learning institutions in india. ..... ) in the year 2005 and the notifications and guidelines issued by the distance education council dated 3.1.2006 and 5.1.2006 issued pursuant thereto, which have been considered in detail by this court in the case of uttarranchal education trade and technology (supra), it is apparent that no open university could have been established or continued without having obtained approval of the distance education council and that no distance education centre could have been established by an open university outside the area of its operation or beyond the territorial limit of the state in which it is situated and, therefore, the admission of the petitioners in m.phil/ph.d and the ..... the impugned act which specifically makes a provision enabling a university to have an off-campus centre outside the state is clearly beyond the legislative competence of the chhattisgarh legislature. 15. ..... it is contended that distance education council is one of the authorities of the university and was set up in the year 1991 and after its formation the distance education council attempted to enlarge the jurisdiction by seeking to control the distance education 13 w.p no.9903/2010 programme being run by other states/private universities. ..... section 2(f) of the amended act defines off- campus centre . .....

Madhu Guru Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... dec- guidelines, 2006 for regulating the establishment and operation of open and distance learning institutions in india. ..... ) in the year 2005 and the notifications and guidelines issued by the distance education council dated 3.1.2006 and 5.1.2006 issued pursuant thereto, which have been considered in detail by this court in the case of uttarranchal education trade and technology (supra), it is apparent that no open university could have been established or continued without having obtained approval of the distance education council and that no distance education centre could have been established by an open university outside the area of its operation or beyond the territorial limit of the state in which it is situated and, therefore, the admission of the petitioners in m.phil/ph.d and the ..... the impugned act which specifically makes a provision enabling a university to have an off-campus centre outside the state is clearly beyond the legislative competence of the chhattisgarh legislature. 15. ..... it is contended that distance education council is one of the authorities of the university and was set up in the year 1991 and after its formation the distance education council attempted to enlarge the jurisdiction by seeking to control the distance education 13 w.p no.9903/2010 programme being run by other states/private universities. ..... section 2(f) of the amended act defines off- campus centre . .....

Smt. Rashmi Rjak Vs. Through Secretary Higher Education Dept.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... dec- guidelines, 2006 for regulating the establishment and operation of open and distance learning institutions in india. ..... ) in the year 2005 and the notifications and guidelines issued by the distance education council dated 3.1.2006 and 5.1.2006 issued pursuant thereto, which have been considered in detail by this court in the case of uttarranchal education trade and technology (supra), it is apparent that no open university could have been established or continued without having obtained approval of the distance education council and that no distance education centre could have been established by an open university outside the area of its operation or beyond the territorial limit of the state in which it is situated and, therefore, the admission of the petitioners in m.phil/ph.d and the ..... the impugned act which specifically makes a provision enabling a university to have an off-campus centre outside the state is clearly beyond the legislative competence of the chhattisgarh legislature. 15. ..... it is contended that distance education council is one of the authorities of the university and was set up in the year 1991 and after its formation the distance education council attempted to enlarge the jurisdiction by seeking to control the distance education 13 w.p no.9903/2010 programme being run by other states/private universities. ..... section 2(f) of the amended act defines off- campus centre . .....