Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh chikitsa mandal adhiniyam 2001 Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 210 results (0.049 seconds)

Bheru Singh Rathore Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1409; 2003(3)WLC481

..... by the first order dated 7.7.2000 the petitioner, who was elected as sarpanch of gram' panchayat, dhunwala (tehsil mandal) on 31.1.2000, was placed under suspension by the divisional commissioner and a recommendation was made to the state government for declaring the seat vacant since he was elected as a general category candidate, against a reserved seat. ..... the petitioner, being aggrieved by the aforesaid orders (annex.p/8 & p/9) filed the instant writ petition on 23.1.2001.10. ..... (4) the offices of the chairpersons in the panchayats at the village or any other level shall be reserved for the scheduled castes, the scheduled tribes and women in such manner as the legislature of a state may, by law, provide: provided that the number of offices of chairpersons reserved for the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes in the panchayats at each level in any state shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same proportion to the level as the population of the scheduled castes in the state or of the scheduled tribes in the state bears to the total population of the state.provided further that .....

Dharamveer Tholia and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC399; 2007(3)WLN569

..... writ petition gave certain directions to the hpsc to prepare a merit-list in addition to the list already sent to the government by including the names of the candidates, who had secured minimum marks as fixed by the commission for qualifying in the written examination and viva voce as well as the aggregate marks in terms of the amended rules, made recommendations to the government and the high court for the purpose of appointment to the unfilled vacancies/posts to the haryana civil service (judicial branch).the ratio of the above observations, in my view, is also ..... not attracted to the instant petitions since it is not the petitioner's case where ..... the bench comprising of three hon'ble judges of the apex court while deciding the said writ petitions by a common judgment held that the creamy layer as propounded in indra sawhney's case (mandal commission case) and ashok kumar thakur case, is not backward and- therefore, not entitled to avail the benefit of reservation under article 16(4). .....

M/S Perfect Thread Mills Ltd Vs. Competent Authority Cum Sdo Girwa an ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... case may be, shall take into consideration- (a) the market value of the land on the date of publication of the notification under section 3-a; (b) the damage, if any, sustained by the person interested at the time of taking possession of the and, by reason of the severing of such land from other land; (c) the damage, if any, sustained by the person interested at the time of taking possession of the land, by reason of the acquisition injuriously affecting his other immovable property in any manner or his earnings; (d) if, in consequences of the acquisition of the land, the person interested is compelled to change his residence or ..... trees which may be on the land at the time of the collector's taking possession thereof; thirdly, the damage (if any), sustained by the person interested, at the time of the collector's taking possession of the land, by reason of severing such land from his other land; fourthly, the damage (if any), sustained by the person interested, at the time of the collector's taking possession of the land, by reason of the acquisition injuriously affecting his other property, movable or immovable, in any other manner, or his earnings; fifthly, if, in consequence of the acquisition of the land by the collector, the person interested is ..... land acquisition officer & mandal r.officer, (2003) 12 scc64212. ..... ram singh, (2001) 6 scc25411 14. m/s. ..... , (2001) 8 scc48216. ..... , (2001) 7 scc65011. .....

Govind Prasad Sharma and Others Vs. State (Education Department) and O ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the common administrative control of the controller of state accounts, the qualifications and status of the officers of the formerly separate units being identical, their work being of the same nature, the recruiting authorities being the same and the standards observed and tests prescribed for entry into the formerly separate units being identical and as such the impugned notifications which resulted in a striking disparity in the promotional opportunities between the officers of the two wings in the ..... work in state government school/state recognized non-government school/ state government educational projects but he is not eligible to claim bonus marks u/r.25 or relaxation in age provided u/r.15(x) of the scheme of rules, 2015 and submits that those who have gained experience in any state government school/state recognized non-government school/state government educational projects like lok jumbish pariyojana, ..... projects are made eligible while they were being permitted to participate in the selection process but the benefit has not been extended to those having experience of working in various projects sponsored by the state government and thus it remains confined to the experience gained by the persons of academic/non-academic work in the state government school/state recognized non-government school/state government educational projects ..... advocate general has also relied on the judgment of the supreme court in om kumar v/s union of india reported in (2001)2 scc 386, in which .....

Nikhil Soni Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... acharya, v/s police commissioner, calcutta (air 1984 sc 51), the supreme court upheld the power of the police to prohibit deleterious practices, such as the sacrifice of human beings in the name of religion, or to direct the exhumation or removal of graves or interred corpses for the purpose of detection of crime or for preventing breach of the peace between fighting communities or to prohibit performance of the 'tandava' dance by the ananda margis in the public streets or places. ..... advocate settled by shri n.k.maloo, senior advocate, shri hemant sogani/himanshu sogani, advocates appearing for the applicant-veerendra kumar jain and shri ajit bhandari, advocate appearing for the respondent no.4, reliance has been placed on various books and articles and references have been made to the religious scriptures including the opinions of shri swami samantbhadra acharya, shrimadacharya pujyapad, shri acharaya uma swami and shri dhyan sagar ji ..... petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india in public interest, the petitioner, a practising lawyer at jaipur bench of the rajasthan high court, has prayed for directions to the union of india through secretary, department of home, new delhi-respondent no.1 and the state of rajasthan through secretary, department of home, secretariat, rajasthan, jaipur-respondent no.2, to treat santhara or sallekhana as illegal and punishable under the law of the land and that the instances given in the pleadings, be investigated and subjected to .....

Rajasthan State Road Trans Corpn. Vs. Manna Ram Kumawat and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... on behalf of the appellant-corporation, while resisting the claim of addition of 30% of actual salary, relying upon the opinion of the hon'ble apex court of the land in the case of reshma kumari (supra),that standardization of addition to income for future prospects though helps in achieving certainty in arriving at appropriate compensation and 50% actual salary towards future prospects where the deceased had a permanent job and was below 40 years, and 30% if the age of the deceased was 40 to 50 years but no addition, if the age of the deceased is more ..... having considered several subsequent decisions of this court, we are of the view that where the deceased was married, the deduction towards personal and living expenses of the deceased, should be one-third (1/3rd) where the number of dependent family members is 2 to 3, one-fourth (1/4th) where the number of dependant family members is 4 to 6, and one-fifth (1/5th) where the number of dependant family members exceed six. 13. ..... learned counsel appearing on behalf of the corporation, reiterating the pleaded facts and grounds of the memo of appeal, asserted that the claimants failed to produce any cogent and convincing evidence as to the monthly income of the deceased, and therefore, the income of rs.4,500/- arrived at, by the tribunal is not supported by any legally sustainable evidence. 5. ..... on 24th december, 2001 at about 4.00 pm, while the deceased lal chand kumawat, was traveling in jeep no. .....

State and Anr Vs. Dr. Kantesh Khetani and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the government of india, vide notification dated 19.09.1983, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section (ii) of the indian medical council act, 1956 (for short, 'the act of 1956'), after consultation with the medical council of india, amended the first schedule appended to the act, incorporating the degrees relating to the nbe, in the first schedule of the act of 1956.5. ..... in brojo nath ganguly's case(supra), the supreme court held, considering the question in the light of section 23 of the contract act, which provides that a contract which is opposed to public policy, would be void, that the public policy is not capable of a precise definition; it however connotes matters which concerns the public good and in public interest. ..... the delhi high court, however, after holding that the students of dnb course are entitled to stipend, did not quantify the stipend, and left the quantum, to be determined by the respondents, with further observation in para-57, that the decision will be applicable to all dnb students, who joined the course contemporaneously with the petitioners therein. ..... ), nbe, dated 24.09.2001, to all the accredited institutions, stating that payment of stipend for the students of dnb course, is now mandatory, and the same be paid to them. ..... learned single judge referred to the judgment of delhi high court in civil writ no.3742/2001- dr. ..... since no action was taken by the respondents, a reminder was issued on 15.12.2001.9. .....

Muni Choudhary and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the petitioner no.6 claims to have applied for the post of assistant child development project officer which was advertised at a later date and was given contractual appointment on the said post by the coordinator cum project director, children development project, jodhpur vide order dated 1.10.2001. ..... in schedule-i and ii on adhoc or officiating or urgent temporary basis and who have been continuously holding such posts for at least one year on the date of commencement of these rules are entitled to be screened by the committee for adjudging their suitability on the posts held by them provided they possess the requisite qualifications prescribed in the rules either for direct recruitment or promotion or the prescribed qualifications on the basis of which such persons were selected for adhoc/officiating/urgent temporary appointment. ..... while attacking upon the action taken by the respondents to terminate the services, it is submitted that petitioners were entitled to be screened by the screening committee for the purpose of regularization as per the rules framed in the year 1998 but without considering their candidature for the purpose of regularization straightaway their services were terminated on the ground that appointments were made by the agency on contract basis. .....

Ambuja Cements Ltd. and Anr Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the petitioner was availing the benefit of deferment of 75% under clause (i) of the notification dated 22.2.2002 for the years 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09, which on the reversal of the judgment of the rajasthan high court by the supreme court in the matter of m/s binani cements, was reduced to 25% and thus, the legal entitlement of the petitioner for deferment under the notification dated 31.3.2006 was also reduced to 25% and therefore, for these three years, the petitioner had availed additional deferment of 50%, which ought to have been paid to the department in the relevant ..... /02-138 dated 22.2.2002 issued by the finance department, government of rajasthan under section 15 of the rajasthan sales tax act, 1994, subject to such orders as may be passed by the hon'ble supreme court in respect of slp filed by the rajasthan state government against the order/judgment of the hon'ble high court of rajasthan, jodhpur dated 2.7.2001 in the matter of commercial taxes officer v/s binani cement ltd. ..... while the term 'restitution' was considered by the supreme court in south-eastern coalfields and other cases excerpted later, the term 'unjust enrichment' came to be considered in sahakari khand udyog mandal ltd. v. .....

Bhanwar Lal Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... petitions were already decided by a coordinate bench of learned single judge of this court on 3/3/2014 against which in an intra court appeal filed by the rpsc before the division bench, the division bench vide order dated 28/7/2014 remanded the cases back to the learned single judge for redeciding these writ petitions for the reasons assigned by the division bench in its order dated 28/7/2014 while disposing of d.b.civil special appeal (writ) no.513/2014 rajasthan public service commission vs. ..... of scaling method and, thus, narrating the various pitfalls in the application of scaling method to the present examination process, he submitted that the learned single judge had rightly quashed the result of the 2012 examination and even after remand by the division bench of this court, the same pitfalls or rather pot holes in the said evaluation technique have caused a tremendous damage to the actual and real evaluation of answer books in the present process and the results so declared by the respondent rpsc on 27/1/2014 deserve to be quashed .....