Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh chikitsa mandal adhiniyam 2001 Page 1 of about 11,231 results (0.386 seconds)

May 05 2021 (SC)

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil Vs. The Chief Minister And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of doubts it is hereby declared that nothing in this act shall affect the reservation provided to the other backward classes under the maharashtra state public services (reservation for scheduled castes, 105 scheduled tribes, de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, special backward category and other backward classes) act, 2001 and the maharashtra private professional educational institutions (reservation of seats for admission for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic ..... 340. in this context, a clarification was issued that article 340 enabled setting up of adhoc bodies like the kaka kalelkar commission and mandal commission, whereas article 338b sought to confer constitutional status on a multi-member permanent ..... classes commission act, 1993; orissa state commission for backward classes act, 1993; west bengal commission for backward classes act, 1993; j&k state commission for backward classes act, 1997; chhatisgarth rajya pichhda varga adhiniyam, 1993 & telangana commission for backward classes act, ..... shri mukul rohatgi, learned senior counsel, has appeared for the state of maharashtra and chhattisgarh. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2015 (HC)

Bhuneshwar Prasad Yadav Vs. Badridhar Diwan

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... it is true that sub section 3-a of the chhattisgarh vidhan mandal sadasya nirarhata nivaran (sansodhan) adhiniyam, 2006 begins with the word subject to and reading of section 3 purports that certain offices specified in the schedule in so far as it is a office of profit under the government would not disqualify their holders for declaring as mlas. ..... was adopted by chhattisgarh and the definition reads as under :- definition in this act, principal act means the chhattisgarh vidhan mandal sadasya nirarhata nivaran adhiniyam, 1967 (no.16 of 1967) 16. ..... therefore, reading of section 3 and section 3-a of the chhattisgarh vidhan mandal sadasya nirarhata nivaran (sansodhan) adhiniyam, 2006 together, will sub-serve the meaning of subject to . ..... the said act was amended by act no.30 of 2006, which reads as under :- the chhattisgarh vidhan mandal sadasya nirarhata nivaran (sansodhan) adhiniyam, 2006 17. ..... sub-section- 3-a, provides that no person holding office of chairman and vice chairman, president and vice president or director or member of any committee shall be disqualified at any time for being chosen as, or for being, a member of the chhattisgarh legislative assembly by reason only of the fact that he holds such office but qualifies that the proviso that holder of any such offices is not in receipt of remuneration other than compensatory allowance. 18. ..... the reliance was placed in case law reported in (2001) 4 scc 139 between union of india vs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2018 (HC)

k.s.chauhan vs.new Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Delhi

..... the claim made by the petitioner in respect of reduction/non availability of site at claridges hotel and in front of eastern court was also rejected on the ground that the petitioner had not followed the procedure as prescribed under clause 8 of the agreement executed between the parties, inasmuch as, the petitioner had not submitted any hindrance report as required in terms of the aforesaid clause. ..... coram hon ble mr justice vibhu bakhru vibhu bakhru, j introduction judgment1 the petitioner has filed the present petition under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter the act ) impugning an arbitral award dated 11.09.2015 (hereafter the impugned award ) passed by the arbitral tribunal constituted of a sole arbitrator. ..... as noticed above, the arbitral tribunal had rejected the petitioner s claim for higher reduction in the monthly license fee on account of exclusion of the parking lots at khan market principally on the basis of the undertaking given by the petitioner. ..... in view of the same, the petitioner claimed that the license fee quoted by the petitioner for all the lots the ten parking areas comprising of group iv ought to be reduced by taking into account the rates charged by ndmc for category a parking lots. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2013 (TRI)

Smt. Sangeetha S Nair, Dancer, Song and Drama Division Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... ) put up a note proposing to give relaxation in educational qualifications in respect of smt.pushpa mandal and shri prem matiyani approved the proposal submitted by shri george, though it was not an appropriate stage and relaxation was not to be given to individual candidates / ..... pushpa mandal she gave the particulars of her qualifications and gave a declaration wherein it is categorically stated as follows:- i fulfill educational and other qualification prescribed for the post and all the statements made in the application are true and complete to the best of my knowledge and ..... pushpa mandal, the specific charge against her is that she did not fulfill the professional qualifications required for the post of dancer in sanddd to which she was appointed with effect from 20.4. ..... pushpa mandal in the list of eligible and ineligible candidates prepared by them for the post of dancer clearly indicating therein that she was ..... by shifting the post in violation of mofs instructions just 10 days before her marriage with shri mandal also exhibits the association of ..... pushpa mandal in the list of eligible and ineligible candidates prepared by them for the post of dancer clearly indicating therein that she was ..... pushpa mandal, the disciplinary authority, vide memorandum dated 10.12.2008, proposed to hold an enquiry under rule 14 of the ccs (cca) rules, ..... pushpa mandal was working with sanddd as empanelled artist at sanddd, nainital, which comes under the territorial jurisdiction of lucknow regional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 1963 (FN)

Retail Clerks Vs. Schermerhorn

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for nonmember payments to the union "for the purpose of aiding the union in defraying costs in connection with its legal obligations and responsibilities as the exclusive bargaining agent of the employees in the appropriate bargaining unit," a provision which petitioners say confines the use of nonmember payments to collective bargaining purposes alone, and forbids their use by the union for institutional purposes unrelated to its exclusive agency functions, all in sharp contrast, it is argued, to the general motors situation, where the nonmember contributions are ..... there is much force in the argument that the assessment of any union security arrangement for the purposes of 7, 8 and 14(b), when there is significant doubt about the matter, is initially a task for the board, so that it may finally come to this court with the benefit of the affected agency's views, and, in all probability, the preemption issue was entitled to different treatment than it received in the florida courts at the time this case was decided. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2016 (HC)

R. Madhan Kumar Vs. The Additional Director, Land Survey and Records D ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... also gave no objection for the same; that the tahsildar, thottiyam has also given a certificate to the effect that no one in the family is employed under the government or private department and the family is in indigent circumstances and the wife of the deceased did not remarry anybody; that the petitioner completed his sslc in april, 2012 and completed hsc in march, 2014 and in response to the application made on 02.07.2012, the 2nd respondent asked the petitioner to produce all the original certificates for considering his ..... request; that the 2nd respondent rejected his request .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1992 (SC)

indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217

..... . recognizing and recalling the self-less and dedicated social service carried on by those great leaders from their birth to the last breath; the then prime minister while making his clarificatory statement regarding the implementation of the mandal commission's report in the rajya sabha on the 9th august 1990 paid the tributes in the following words:in fact this is the realisation of the dream of bharat ratna dr. b.r ..... . now that we have answered all the questions raised for our consideration, question new arises, whether in view of the answers given and directions being given by us, is it necessary to send back the matter to the five-judge bench to consider whether the investigation and survey done, and conclusions arrived at, by the mandal commission are contrary to law and if so, whether the impugned office memorandums, based as they are on the report of the said commission, can be sustained ..... serve a correct basis for identifying the 'backward class', that therefore, a fresh commission under article 340(1) of the constitution is required to be appointed to make a fresh wide survey sumey through out the length and breadth of the country and submit a new list of obcs (other backward classes) on the basis of the present day census and that there are million ways of guaranteeing progress of backward classes and ensuring that it percolates down the social scale, but the mandal commission is the one.268 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2010 (TRI)

indeevarakshan Nair M.P. and Others (Ex. No.13875382 Rect), Kerala Ver ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

..... (7) while considering a case which arose after 1.1.1996 the relevant provisions of orders issued by the ministry of defence dated 31.1.2001, 7.2.2001, 1.9.2005, 31.5.2006 and 20.7.2006 shall also be applied in addition to the principle laid down in baby's case. ..... the government of india issued another letter no.1(2)/97/d (pen-c) dated 7th february, 2001 stating the modalities for implementation of the recommendation of the fifth central pay commission. ..... the ministry of defence, government of india has issued letter no.1(2) 97/d (pen-c) dated 31st january, 2001 regarding implementation of the government decisions on the recommendations of the fifth central pay commission regarding disability pension etc. ..... since the petitioner was discharged after 1.1.1996, he is entitled to get the benefit of rounding off as provided in para 7.2 of letter no.1(2)/97/d - (pen-c) dated 31st january, 2001 issued by the ministry of defence. 50. ..... he is entitled to the benefit of rounding off as stated in para 7.2 of letter no.1(2)/97/d-(pen-c) dated 31.1.2001 of the ministry of defence, government of india. ..... (2001) 3 scc 537, it was held as follows: "in the case of arnit das v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2004 (HC)

Ranga Reddy District Sarpanches' Association and Ors. Vs. Government o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659

..... in this behalf with regard to the subjects enumerated in the first schedule, the zilla parishad is also empowered to examine and approve the budgets of the mandal parishads in the district, distribute the funds allotted to the district by the central or state government among the mandal parishads and mandals in the district, to co-ordinate and consolidate the plans prepared in respect of mandals in the district, to prepare plans in respect of the entire district, to secure the execution of plans, projects, schemes or other works in respect of individual mandals or common to two or more mandals in the district and to generally supervise the activity of mandal parishads in the district. ..... andhra bank, : 2001(4)ald153 , the decisions (ajit singh v. ..... 304, 25, 107, 248, 249, dated 5-10-2001, 21-1-2002, 26-3-2002, 29-6-2002 and 29-6-2002. g.o. ms. no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2020 (SC)

The State Of Maharashtra Vs. Keshao Vishwanath Sonone

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (2001) 1 scc43) whether the high court could have entered into the adjudication of the issue that gond gowari which is a scheduled tribe mentioned in scheduled tribes order, 1950, as amended up to date is no more in existence and was extinct before 1911?.4) whether the conclusion of the high court in the impugned judgment that gond gowari tribe was extinct before 1911 is supported on the materials which were on record before the ..... our own doubts about the correctness of the ratio of judgment in the state of 94 maharashtra versus mana adim jamat mandal with regard to a ..... purposes for joining number of tribes together in one entry, but as observed above in case with regard to gond gowari the affinity is more than apparent with gond and the judgment of this court in state of maharashtra versus mana adim jamat mandal (supra) cannot be read as an authority to hold that gond gowari is not a sub-tribe of gond and no affinity is required to be established with gond by the tribe gond gowari . ..... on judgment of this court in state of maharashtra versus mana adim jamat mandal ,(2006)4 scc98 in the above case, two questions were raised which have been noticed in the paragraph 1 of the judgment which is to the following effect: - 91 1. ..... filed civil appeal arising out of diary no.17886 of 2020 as well as one zanaklal bhaisaku mangar, who was respondent no.15 in writ petition no.4779 of 2008 filed by adivasi gond govari (gowari) sewa mandal has filed slp (c) no.7901 of 2019 in this court.11. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //