Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the chhattisgarh chikitsa mandal adhiniyam 2001 Court: kolkata Page 11 of about 359 results (0.065 seconds)

Satanu Tirki Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN224

..... the opinion expressed by the division bench was that the act of 2005 was prospective in its operation and that notwithstanding the west bengal school service commission act, the clarification relating to physical education teachers contained in the memorandum of march 8, 2000 and the reference therein to the memorandum of november 22, 1993 would show that even in the year 2000 (which was well after the west bengal school service commission act came into effect in 1997), the memorandum of november 22, 1993 continued to retain ..... in the tarak chandra roy case the teacher was appointed under the procedure laid down by the school service commission and though the question framed by the single judge and referred to the division bench was wide in the manner in which it was worded, the division bench chose not to give any specific answer to the question. ..... in that case the petitioner was appointed on march 23, 1999 as an assistant teacher in physical education and applied on september 27, 2001 for grant of the post-graduate scale of pay on the basis of his enhanced qualification in the relevant subject. ..... the division bench was of the view that the act of 2005 which came into force on december 27, 2005 could have no manner of application as the teacher had acquired the post-graduate degree in 2001.10. .....

Anupam Talukdar Vs. Smt. Piyali Talukdar

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1846

..... it is also pertinent to point out that word 'proof appears in section 125 as originally framed and while incorporating the proviso whereby the application for interim maintenance was introduced by the legislature consequent to the subsequent amendment effected by act 50 of 2001, the word 'proof is not introduced in the said proviso. ..... it is stated in the affidavit in reply that it was agreed between the parties that the opposite party would not ask for maintenance from the petitioner herein and for that reason even though the parties are residing separately since november, 2001, no application was filed till 2007.13 ..... proviso to section 125 which was incorporated by act 50 of 2001 prescribes that in appropriate cases, the magistrate is empowered to direct payment of monthly allowance for the interim maintenance of his wife etc. ..... absence of the word 'interim' maintenance' in section 126 would in my view indicates that legislature while effecting amendment to section 125 by act 50 of 2001, did not consider it necessary that in deciding application for interim maintenance, the court is required to take evidence, otherwise such procedure would have been incorporated by effecting necessary amendment to section 126 of the code of criminal ..... the opposite party is residing separately on and from november, 2001 and the petitioner herein has not paid any amount as maintenance to his wife ..... ultimately the opposite party herein left her matrimonial home on 1st november, 2001 along with her .....

B. Dharma Rao and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ313CAT

..... it appears that the respondents did not do anything in this connection, even though the applicant had been representing from time to time regarding his absorption in a post having the same scale as also fall in the emoluments on account of the order dated 24.4.2001.even prior to the issue of the same order dated 24.4.2001, the applicant had, on 7.1.2001. ..... 1 was posted as call boy vide office order no.estt/med.decat,/09/2001 dated 24.4.2001, with the foot note that the pay and seniority shall be fixed as per extant rules. ..... on 15.5.2001, the applicant represented against the order dated 24.4.2001 with reference to his earlier representations made and he again sought for absorption as office clerk or as trimmer in which case drop in the emoluments will not be so heavy which will be in the case of absorption in group-d, he, therefore, requested for review of his case and issue posting orders as office clerk/trimmer. ..... the representations are dated 7.1.2001,22.1,2001,16.2.2001,15.5.2001 and 4.6.2001. ..... there is no doubt that in the order dated 24.4.2001, it is stated that the pay and seniority shall be fixed as per the extant rules (estt. ..... 122/99 to which reference was made in the order dated 24.4.2001, the applicant was entitled to full protection of pay and seniority. ..... according to the respondents, instead of accepting the alternative posting, the applicant preferred voluntary retirement vide applicantdated5.9.2001 on health grounds, which was allowed vide order dated 12.11,2001. .....

Peerless Securities Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2005)94ITD89(Kol.)

..... may be considered as laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business and, are as such, allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the act as stated in the board's circular/notifications, which have already stated above in para 4.1 hereto.7.34 applying the various principles and test as discussed in foregoing paras and in the light of the cumulative effect of all the decisions, we are of the considered view that the payment of admission fee to become a dealer on otc ..... the totality of the nature of the dealership granted by the otc exchange of india to the assessee and the terms and conditions related thereto, we are of the view that the advantage of being a dealer on the otc exchange of india and to operate the counter at the otc exchange of india, is in the nature of an advantage in the commercial sense and not in the ..... exchange of india and to operate the counter, and the payment for imparting training to assessee's employees so as to ..... ) 882 : (2001) 118 taxman 104 (mumbai)(mag) in which it has been held that licence fee paid to the dot amounting to .....

Peerless Securities Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2005)60SCL59NULL

..... may be considered as laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business and are as such allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the act as stated in the board's circulars/notifications, which have already stated above in paragraph 4.1 hereto.7.34 applying the various principles and test as discussed in foregoing paras and in the light of the cumulative effect of all the decisions, we are of the considered view that the payment of admission fee to become a dealer on otc ..... the totality of the nature of the dealership granted by the otc exchange of india to the assessee and the terms and conditions related thereto, we are of the view that the advantage of being a dealer on the otc exchange of india and to operate the counter at the otc exchange of india is in the nature of an advantage in the commercial sense and not in the ..... exchange of india and to operate the counter, and the payment for imparting training to assessee's employees so as to ..... the matter no point of law worth the name arises out of the tribunal's order dated 21st of september, 2001 .....

Sesa International Limited Vs. Avani Projects and Infrastructure Limit ...

Court : Kolkata

..... in consideration of the facility agreement and the grant of the mortgage debt by the mortgagee to the mortgagor and in consideration of the convents given by the mortgagor and the holding company to the mortgagee, under the facility agreement and under these presents to secure the repayment on the due date and in accordance with this deed the mortgage debt and in consideration of the covenants given by the mortgagor to the mortgagee under these presents the mortgagor hereby grants, conveys, assure, transfers and assigns unto the mortgagee the mortgaged property (without possession).5.4. ..... according to kerr on receiver (2001).he is an impartial person appointed by the court to collect and receive, pending the proceedings, the rents, issues and profits of land, or personal estate, which it does not seem reasonable to the court that either party should collect or receive, or for enabling the same to be distributed among the persons entitled . ..... mr.mitra submits that the jda has always been recognized as akin to partnership and in this regard reliance has been placed on an unreported judgment of this court dated 11th december, 2001 passed by hon ble justice ashok kumar ganguly in akla builders pvt.ltd.versus cityscape developers pvt.ltd. .....

Indian Craft Village Trust and anr. Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corporation ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN327

..... notice, the said resolution of the mic and the said order of the mayor and further to desist the respondents from dispossessing the petitioners from the said leasehold property except by complying ..... challenging the legality of termination of the lease by kmc as well as the legality of demand for immediate possession, the trust and its secretary filed instant writ petition, inter alia, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to forthwith recall, rescind, withdraw and/or cancel the impugned notice dated 19th december, 2001 and also the resolution of the mic and the order of the mayor both dated 24th august, 2001 and also to desist the respondents from giving effect to and/or further effect to the impugned .....

Jagmohan Kothari Vs. Smt. Jamuna Devi Kothari and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... mr.arindam mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the applicant, m/s.koti ratan developers private limited, contended in the application that it has acquired one-fourth interest in those properties from the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased appellant under a registered deed of conveyance dated may 22, ..... ms.anuradha poddar, learned advocate appearing for the heirs and legal representatives being the respondent no.7 of the deceased appellant does not raise any objection to such ..... thus, we allow this application and direct the addition of koti ratan developers private limited , a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its registered office at no.59, cotton street, third floor, kolkata 7-00 007 as respondent in this ..... it is, further, stated that sree ballabh kothari, the respondent no.7 in this appeal, also, conveyed his undivided one-fourth share in those properties in favour of koti ratan developers private limited by executing registered deed of conveyance dated may 22, ..... mr.pranav sharma, learned advocate appearing for the said heirs undertakes to file vakalatnama for them by one week from ..... , it is prayed that, in view of such devolution of interest, the said koti ratan developers private limited is a necessary party in this appeal and they prayed for their addition in the category of the respondent. ..... we, thus, direct substitution of the said heirs and legal representatives of the deceased appellant in this appeal instead and place of original .....

Smt. Suman Bakshi and Ors. Vs. Aradhana Investment Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... amendment the appeal the suit preferred against the order dated august 29, 2001 was dismissed by the appeal court on december 21, 2001. ..... in support of his various contentions learned counsel for the defendant cites all india reporter 1987 sc2328 (1998) 9 scc613 (1998) 9 scc719 all india reporter 2013 sc weekly 1454, (2001) 5 scc101and all india reporter 2014 sc weekly 580. ..... the parties went to trial on the basis of the seven issues settled by the order dated july 18, 2001. ..... the third issue does not survive the order dated august 29, 2001 when amendment to the plaint was allowed. ..... the plaintiff obtained the order dated august 29, 2001 allowing amendment to property has adequately been the plaint. ..... the appeal against the order dated august 29, 2001 was dismissed on december 21, 2011. ..... the seven issues settled on july 18, 2001 for trial are as follows: i) is the suit maintainable in its present form ?. ..... the issues in the suit were settled on july 18, 2001. ..... such application was allowed by the order dated august 29, 2001. ..... the issues were settled on july 18, 2001. ..... learned counsel for the plaintiff points out that seven issues were framed by order dated july 18, 2001. .....

Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors. Vs. Kesoram Industries ...

Court : Kolkata

..... /or clarifications contained in the letter dated september 5/6, 1995; (e) rule ..... siddhartha mitra submitted that while inspection was held by the concerned insurance inspector several irregularities were detected for which the appellants were directed by the inspector not to take the wages so paid against work on holiday for the purpose of determining the coverage of an employee under section 2(9) of the esi act, and also not to treat milk allowance ..... so that the same be quashed and conscionable justice rendered; (c) appropriate orders and/or directions do issue for the production of all relevant records and for the protection of all the rights of the petitioners and for granting the petitioners such further reliefs as in the circumstances shall be just; (d) a writ of and/or order in the nature of prohibition prohibiting the respondents and each of them, their servants, agents and/or assigns from giving further effect to or from taking any step pursuant to or in furtherance of the directives and .....