Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 38 filling of casual vacancies Sorted by: recent Page 11 of about 631 results (0.164 seconds)

Bob Jones Univ. Vs. Simon

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 7, 1974 decided may 15, 1974 416 u.s. 725 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit syllabus petitioner, a private university, was notified by the internal revenue service (irs), pursuant to a newly announced policy of denying tax-exempt status for private schools with racially discriminatory admissions policies ..... act is said to be inapplicable because the case does not truly involve taxes. we disagree. the service bases its ..... of its implications, this case falls within the literal scope and the purposes of the act. petitioner further contends that the service's actions do not represent an effort to protect the revenues, but an attempt to regulate the admissions policies of private universities. under this line of argument, the anti-injunction page 416 u. s. 740 .....

Khagendra Nath Sen Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1974Cal187

..... 1970 informed the petitioner that the said three colleges, namely, asutosh, jogmaya and shama prasad had come within the purview of the statute 100 of the calcutta university act, 1966. the said intimation was made according to the direction of the vice-chancellor and the syndicate. thereafter, the inspector of college by his letter dated september ..... 1973. the ad hoc committee was constituted by the syndicate in exercise of its powers under section 4 (ii) read with section 23 of the calcutta university act, 1966, inasmuch as there was no validly constituted governing bodies of the said three colleges and as such the said three colleges were being managed by incompetent ..... be challenged in a writ petition.5. i will first deal with the second objection. under section 3 of the calcutta university act, 1966, the 1st chancellor, and the vice-chancellor of the university and the 1st members of the senate, the syndicate and the academic council, and all persons who may hereafter become such .....

Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi847

..... of the writs like habeas corpus or quo warranto this rule may have to be relaxed or modified. the case in dr. p. s. venkataswamy setty v. university of mysore and others air 1964 mys 159 (8) has no application in so far as the particular question we are dealing with is concerned because the mysore high ..... regional committee of the milk marketing board, made a complaint to the minister of agriculture, fisheries and food, pursuant to section 19(3)(b) of the agricultural marketing act, 195,8, asking that their complaint be referred to the committee of investigation established under that enactment. the complaint was that the board's terms and prices for ..... quashing the impugned order dated december 19, 1972 (annexure ix) and directing the central government to appoint a commission of inquiry under section 3 of the commissions of inquiry act, 1952, to inquire into the charges contained in the memoranda dated october 27, 1971 and february 24, 1972 (annexures i and ii) against mr. bansi lal be .....

United States Dept. of Agriculture Vs. Murry

Court : US Supreme Court

..... process clause of the fourteenth amendment, a connecticut statute establishing a permanent, conclusive presumption of nonresidency for purposes of qualifying for reduced tuition rates at a state university. vlandis v. kline, 412 u. s. 441 . as we said in that case: "in sum, since connecticut purports to be concerned with residency ..... very important and the governmental interest can be promoted without much difficulty by a well designed hearing procedure, the due process clause requires the government to act on an individualized basis, with general propositions serving only as rebuttable presumptions or other burden-shifting devices. that, i think, is the import of stanley ..... by appellants, to persons who contend that they were not validly claimed as dependents. mr. justice blackmun, dissenting. section 5(b) of the food stamp act, which the court today holds unconstitutional, is not happily drafted. and surely is not the kind of statute that attracts sympathetic review. its purposes, however, .....

Vlandis Vs. Kline

Court : US Supreme Court

..... but even a casual examination of how such a plan would operate indicates why it did not commend itself to the connecticut legislature. the very act of enrolling in a connecticut university with the intention of completing a program of studies leading to a degree necessitates the physical presence of the student in the state of connecticut. ..... admission to such a unit was outside of connecticut." these classifications are permanent and irrebuttable for the whole time that the student remains at the university, since 126(a)(5) of the act commands that: "the status of a student, as established at the time of his application for admission at a constituent unit of the state ..... the fourteenth amendment, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. it is so ordered. [ footnote 1 ] section 122 of that act provides that "the board of trustees of the university of connecticut shall fix fees for tuition of not less than three hundred fifty dollars for residents of this state and not less than eight .....

Tilton Vs. Richardson

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , vacated and remanded. the chief justice, joined by mr. justice harlan, mr. justice stewart, and mr. justice blackmun, concluded that: 1. the act includes colleges and universities with religious affiliations. pp. 403 u. s. 676 -677. 2. congress' objective of providing more opportunity for college education is a legitimate secular goal ..... taxpayers of the united states and residents of connecticut. they brought this suit for injunctive relief against the officials who administer the act. four church-related colleges and universities in connecticut receiving federal construction grants under title i were also named as defendants. federal funds were used for five projects at ..... the performance of their secular educational functions. the district court ruled that title i authorized grants to church-related colleges and universities. it also sustained the constitutionality of the act, finding that it had neither the purpose nor the effect of promoting religion. 312 f.supp. 1191. we noted probable .....

Board of Education Vs. Allen

Court : US Supreme Court

..... disclosed what was happening in one catholic school: [ footnote 3/13 ] "on february 24, 1954, rev. cyril f. meyer, c. m., then vice-president of the university, sent the following letter to all the faculty, both catholics and non-catholics, even those teaching law, science, and mathematics: " "dear faculty member: " "as a result ..... parochial school's principal or its individual instructors, who are, in the case of roman catholic schools, normally priests or nuns. the next step under the act is an "individual request" for an eligible textbook ( 701, subd. 3), but the state education department has ruled that a pupil may make his request ..... purchased all their children's textbooks. and see statement of then commissioner of education keppel: "nonpublic schools rarely provide free textbooks." hearings on elementary and secondary education act of 1965 before general subcommittee on education of house committee on education and labor, 89th cong., 1st sess., pt. 1, 93 (1965). [ footnote 7 ] .....

Mapp (inspector of Taxes) Vs. Oram.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1969]71ITR354(Cal)

..... . section21(1) provides, amongst other things, for a deductions of pound 36 in respect of one child over 16 year receiving full-time instruction at any university. section 21(3) provides that no such deduction should be allowed ink respect of any child who is entitled in his own right to an income exceeding ..... 150 clearly possessed, are income in the income tax sense whether or not in the particular circumstances they are chargeable to tax.various sections of the income tax acts were referred to and certain authorities cited in the course of argument, showing that though in certain statutory contexts 'income' means, and means only, chargeable income ..... of a resident in america derived under an american disposition from american assets' because in their context they applied 'only to income chargeable under the british finance act of the year.' in reaching this conclusion on the interpretation of the lstattuute, lord macmillan invoked the principle that :'so far as the intention of an enactment .....

Rudolph Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... meeting of the american bar association; to a legal secretary attending the national convention of the national association; to physicians attending medical conventions; to certified public accountants attending conventions; to university teachers in attending conventions or scientific meetings; to professional cartoonists attending political conventions; to persons attending the red cross convention; to school teachers attending summer school; to attorneys attending an ..... congress, not for the court. the test of deductibility to be applied here is whether the expenses are "ordinary and necessary" in the carrying on of petitioner's business. the act is explicit in permitting the deduction of traveling expenses (including the page 370 u.s. 269, 281 entire amount expended for meals and lodging) while away from home in the .....

Rudolph Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... meeting of the american bar association; to a legal secretary attending the national convention of the national association; to physicians attending medical conventions; to certified public accountants attending conventions; to university teachers in attending conventions or scientific meetings; to professional cartoonists attending political conventions; to persons attending the red cross convention; to school teachers attending summer school; to attorneys attending an ..... congress, not for the court. the test of deductibility to be applied here is whether the expenses are "ordinary and necessary" in the carrying on of petitioner's business. the act is explicit in permitting the deduction of traveling expenses (including the page 372 u. s. 281 entire amount expended for meals and lodging) while away from home in the "pursuit .....