Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
..... these judgments are not applicable. this is a case of refund of fee and it has been specifically mentioned by the honble supreme court in maharshi dayanand university v. surjeet kaur?, 2010(2) cpc 696 s.c., relying upon all earlier judgments held that education is not a commodity. educational institutions are not ..... the opposite parties, who filed written statement taking preliminary objections that the complainant is not entitled to get any refund as per the policy of the university as well as guidelines of all india council of technical education (in short aicte), the complainant joined and attended the classes for the ist semester, ..... service. such matters cannot be entertained by the consumer forum under the consumer protection act, 1986. further honble supreme court in bihar school examination board versus suresh prasad sinha?, 2010 (1) clt 255 (sc) observed that the education boards and universities are not service provider and the complaints against them are not maintainable. the .....
Tag this Judgment!