Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 23 the board of schools Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.051 seconds)

Feb 06 2002 (HC)

Jiby P. Chacko Vs. Principal, Mediciti School of Nursing, Ghanpur, Ran ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-06-2002

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD827

..... behaviour resulting in inconvenience to other students etc., the educational institution would only be acting administratively. however, in the matter of explusion or rustication, the same is not the case. this was explained in glynn v. keele university, (1971) 2 a11.er 89. the vice-chancellor of keele university took disciplinary action against a number of students who are found standing or sitting ..... court in unnikrishnan v. state of a.p., : [1993]1scr594 , 'private educational institutions do not perform an independent activity and they perform the activity supplemental to principal activity carried on by the state.' the educational institutions would not attract alumni unless the degrees and diplomas offered by them are recognised by the affiliating university or recognising agency like nursing council. the recognition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 2002 (TRI)

Department of Post Vs. Md. Tamijur Rahman

Court : Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati

Decided on : Jun-08-2002

..... to the respondent/petitioner. 2. the case in brief is that the respondent/petitioner sent rs. 2,000/- by tmo to his daughter at aligarh university, aligarh on 26.7.1995 through the tezpur head post office, but the tmo was not delivered in time. when the respondent/petitioner brought this to the notice of the appellant/opposite party on ..... . 7. the appellant also brought to our notice a number of cases in which the national consumer disputes redressal commission has held that unless there is fraud, wilful act or default in the course of transmission by post, officers of the post office cannot be held liable. in this respect specific mention may be made to post master ..... such loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal articles in course of transmission by post. the respondent has not been able to prove that there was any wilful act or default on the part of the appellant nor there is anything which can be termed as fraudulent. we are, therefore, inclined to agree to the contention that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2002 (HC)

Shri Agnelo Alexinho Lobo, Indian Inhabitant, Residing at House No. 67 ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR273

..... framework of the law underwhich the enquiry has to be held and theconstraints of the tribunal or body of personsappointed for that purpose. see saresh koshy jorgev. the university of kerala : [1969]1scr317 .the expression 'reasonable opportunity' has come upfor consideration before the apex court and thehigh courts, both under constitutional provisionsas also statutory ..... and, consequentlythe opportunity offered was sham; (e) the director of panchayats exercising powersunder section 50(4) and 50(5) and section 210 ofthe panchayat raj act, acts as a quasi-judicialauthority and that being the case, he ought not tobe a judge in his own cause. in the instant case,the respondent no.1 ..... to be quashedand set aside. (f) the respondent no.1 when discharges functionsunder section 50(4) and 50(5) and section 210-a ofthe act has to act as quasi-judicial authority andthe order passed must disclose reasons, more so inthe absence of any remedy of appeal or revision.apart from disclosing the reasons .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2002 (SC)

T.M.A. Pai Foundation and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-2002

Reported in : AIR2003SC355; 2003(51)BLJR158; JT2002(9)SC1; 2003(1)KarLJ1; (2002)8SCC481; (2002)3UPLBEC2817

..... 109. in state of kerala, etc. v. very rev. mother provincial, etc. 0065/1970 : [1971]1scr734 the challenge was to various provisions of the kerala university act, 1969, whose provisions effected private colleges, particularly those founded by minority communities in the state of kerala. the said provisions, inter alia, sought to provide for the ..... was open to all sections of the people. the question, therefore, was whether the college could claim the protection of section 48-b of the bihar universities act read with article 30(1) of the constitution, only if it proved that the educational institution was furthering the rights mentioned in article 29(1). section ..... of institution, population andeducational needs of minorities.q.9 whether the decision of this court in unni krishnan j.p. v. state of a.p. : [1993]1scr594 (except where it holds that primary education is afundamental right) and the scheme framed thereunder requiredreconsideration/modification and if yes, what?a. the scheme framed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2002 (HC)

R. Seshagiri Rao and ors. Vs. University of Hyderabad and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-11-2002

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD720

..... was modified. it is stated that the association filed an appeal before the executive council, as provided under the provisions of the university of hyderabad act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to 'the act'). later, the individuals - petitioners also preferred appeals. though the appellate authority issued a show cause notice to the petitioners for ..... not to indulge in criminal activities. the incident that had occurred on 10-1-2002 is worse than a criminal act by criminals. the students, who are admitted into the university to pursue their education, are not expected to indulge in violence of this sort. when the appellate authority had ..... apart from the said report, there were also complaints from the students associations, teaching staff, non-teaching and university officers' associations for taking immediate and stem action, condemning the illegal and brutal act of manhandling the teaching and nonteaching staff, by the petitioners. the associations of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2002 (HC)

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. A.M. Shaikh

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-11-2002

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1807

..... , the apex court has also considered this aspect of regularization in service and also as regular pay-scale to such daily wager employees in case of gujarat agricultural university v. rathod labhu bechar, reported in air 2001 sc 706. relevant observations made in paras 18, 19 and 30 are quoted as under :-'18. what emerges ..... . said award of reinstatement made by the labour court concerned was challengedby the petitioner-corporation before this court by filing special civil application no. 13353 of 1993 which was rejected by this court, and thereafter, award of reinstatement made by the labour court as confirmed by this court was implemented by the corporation ..... in para 21 which is reproduced as under :'21. the matter directly arose before the supreme court in the context of provisions under the industrial disputes act relating to unfair labour practice connected with continued long employment as casual or temporary hand. the claim of workmen to permanent status on the ground that their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 2002 (FN)

Zelman Vs. Simmons-harris

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-27-2002

..... cases, we are exponentially more diverse today. america boasts more than 55 different religious groups and subgroups with a significant number of members. graduate center of the city university of new york, b. kosmin, e. mayer, & a. keysar, american religious identification survey 12-13 (2001). major religions include, among others, protestants, ..... the principal evils that the first amendment sought to forestall"); b. kosmin & s. lachman, one nation under god: religion in contemporary american society 24 (1993) (first amendment designed in "part to prevent the religious wars of europe from entering the united states"). whatever the framers might have thought about particular ..... "effect" of advancing or inhibiting religion. agostini v. felton, 521 u. s. 203 , 222-223 (1997) ("[wje continue to ask whether the government acted with the purpose of advancing or inhibiting religion [and] whether the aid has the 'effect' of advancing or inhibiting religion" (citations omitted)). there is no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //