Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 21 the academic council Page 10 of about 4,680 results (0.242 seconds)

Naveen Jindal Vs. M/S Zee Media Corporation Ltd and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... in haryana. he is also described as the chairman of m/s.jindal steel & power limited. his varied interests, including his educational qualifications from the university of texas, usa, his crusade regarding the national flag and having participated in international level shooting events including the asian games have been described. defendant no. ..... deliberate harm and the prejudice to the plaintiff. suggestions are being made in the course of the programmes to suggest that the entire administrative machinery is acting in collusion with the plaintiff. it is further urged that though the version of the plaintiff is purportedly aired, it is a highly edited version and ..... the news programmes published and broadcasted by defendants no.1 and 2 are motivated with the intent of sensationalizing the matter and conducting a media trial. the acts are per se defamatory, false, frivolous and misleading.12. it is averred that the defendants have aired more than 20 false, defamatory programmes against the .....

Ftc Vs. Superior Ct. Tla

Court : US Supreme Court

..... who continued to take cases were soon overloaded. the overall response of the uptown lawyers to the pds call for help was feeble, reflecting their universal distaste for criminal law, their special aversion for compelled indigency representation, the near epidemic siege of self-doubt about their ability to handle cases in ..... at issue." the social justifications proffered for respondents' restraint of trade thus do not make it any less unlawful. the statutory policy underlying the sherman act "precludes inquiry into the question whether competition is good or bad." ibid. respondents' argument, like that made by the petitioners in professional engineers, ultimately ..... the district of columbia government increased the lawyers' compensation. the questions presented are whether the lawyers' concerted conduct violated 5 of the federal trade commission act and if so, whether it was nevertheless protected by the first amendment to the constitution. [ footnote 1 ] i the burden of providing competent .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC108

..... show cause notices and the assessment orders as issued thereon, were vitiated by total lack of jurisdiction. it was pointed out by them that the said act does not contain provisions for creating liability with retrospective effect and such being the position, the concerned show cause notices, which sought to create liability retrospectively ..... after necessary tests regarding their operational efficency and when fitness certificate is issued by the railways authorities, the liability to pay excise duty under the said act would therefore be on the said petitioners, as manufacturers of complete wagons. he has also indicated that the said petitioners charged excise duty on the ..... and not parts thereof, the value of container and lead acid will form part of the assessable value of batteries under section 4 of the central excises act because the manufacturing cost of the finished storage battery cannot be conceived of without taking into consideration the cost of its container, and lead acid. the .....

Sri Nipun Mehrotra Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Reported in : (2008)110ITD520(Bang.)

..... to waste its words or to say anything in vain and a construction which attributes redundancy to the legislature will not be accepted except for compelling reasons.bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill p. ltd. construction of statute that statutory enactment must ordinarily be construed according to their plain meaning and no words should be added ..... to prevent a provision from being unintelligible, absurd, unreasonable, unworkable or totally irreconcilable with the rest of the statue.8. section 54(2) was substituted by the finance act, 1987. the scope and effect of amendments were elaborated vide circular no. 495 dt.22^nd october, 87. section 54(2) and 54f(4) were introduced to ..... section 139. hence, one cannot interpret that section 139 mentioned should be read as section 139(1). similar language is appearing in section 54(2) of the it act.cit v. rajesh kumar jalan 286 itr 274 has held that section 139 mentioned will not only include section 139(1) but will also include all sub- .....

Mittal Court Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2010]320ITR414(Bom); [2004]140TAXMAN145(Bom)

..... the resultant assessment a nullity nor that the phrase 'so far as may be' in section 148 has to be universally applied without having any regard to the context in which a given provision of the income tax act has to be applied to the reassessment proceedings. keeping the aforesaid in view, we now proceed to consider the ..... 243 itr 89 . 4. transfer fees - mutuality concept (a) walkeshwar triveni co-op. hsg. soc. ltd. v. cit (sb-mum)(b) cit v. apsara co-op. housing society ltd. : [1993]204itr662(cal) (c) cit v. adarsh co-op. housing society ltd. : [1995]213itr677(guj) (d) cit v. presidency co-op. housing society, ltd. : [1995]216itr321(bom) (e) sagar ..... ]169itr732(ap) (f) sports club of gujarat v. cit : [1988]171itr504(guj) (g) cit v. ranchi club ltd., 196 itr 37 (h) cit v. bombay oilseeds & oil exchange ltd. : [1993]202itr198(bom) (i) cit v. ceivent allocation & coordination org. : [1999]236itr553(bom) (j) cit v. royal western india turf club ltd. : [1953]24itr551(sc) (k) cit v. bankipur club .....

Maharashtra Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary Vs. Shri K ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR2146

..... 5.1 candidates must - 5.1.1 possess a degree in pharmacy or pharmaceutical chemistry or in medicine with specialization in clinical pharmacology or microbiology from a university established in india by law; and5.1.2 experience gained after acquiring qualification mentioned in clause 5.1.1. above, in the manufacture or testing of ..... , which arises is whether as held by the tribunal in the impugned judgment and order whether the petitioner in shortlisting the candidates by applying preferential criteria has acted dehors the rules. for the said purpose, the advertisement issued will have to be seen. the eligibility or qualification mentioned in the said advertisement as can ..... itself by holding that in applying the preferential criteria in clauses 2(b) and 2(d) as communicated to each of the applicants, the petitioner has acted dehors the said rules. the learned counsel further submitted that the tribunal has failed to appreciate that the recruitment rules provided for giving preference to the .....

V.B.C. Industries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (1994)48ITD292(Hyd.)

..... years, namely the year in which the lump sum consideration is paid and the five immediately succeeding years. where the know-how is developed in a laboratory, university or institution referred to in sub-section (2b) of section 32a, the consideration shall be spread equally over three years.therefore, it was argued that this ..... the contracts themselves with the foreign buyers. the entire documentation thus established that this export business was done only by the assessee and the sister concern acted as an agent of the assessee. the other objection that the deduction under section 80hhc is not available where there is no profit from the export ..... that the provisions of section 35ab were intended to give special deduction as special incentive to persons who are already in business. this provision was introduced under finance act, 1985. memorandum explaining the provisions of the finance bill, 1985 are found given in 152 itr, and the relevant provision, namely section 35ab were explained at .....

Shri Agnelo Alexinho Lobo, Indian Inhabitant, Residing at House No. 67 ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR273

..... framework of the law underwhich the enquiry has to be held and theconstraints of the tribunal or body of personsappointed for that purpose. see saresh koshy jorgev. the university of kerala : [1969]1scr317 .the expression 'reasonable opportunity' has come upfor consideration before the apex court and thehigh courts, both under constitutional provisionsas also statutory ..... and, consequentlythe opportunity offered was sham; (e) the director of panchayats exercising powersunder section 50(4) and 50(5) and section 210 ofthe panchayat raj act, acts as a quasi-judicialauthority and that being the case, he ought not tobe a judge in his own cause. in the instant case,the respondent no.1 ..... to be quashedand set aside. (f) the respondent no.1 when discharges functionsunder section 50(4) and 50(5) and section 210-a ofthe act has to act as quasi-judicial authority andthe order passed must disclose reasons, more so inthe absence of any remedy of appeal or revision.apart from disclosing the reasons .....

Dove Investments Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investme ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2005]124CompCas399(Mad); (2005)6CompLJ490(Mad); 2005(1)CTC249; (2005)1MLJ269; [2005]60SCL604(Mad)

..... the context, subject-matter and object of the statutory provision in question in determining whether the same is mandatory or directory. according to their lordships, no universal principle of law could be laid in that behalf as to whether a particular provision or enactment shall be considered mandatory or directory and it is the duty ..... 1965- 66 and sub-section (1-a), (1-b), (1-c) and (1-d) were introduced for the first time by the companies (amendment) act, 1965 [act 31/1965]. the learned judge has observed that the supreme court was interpreting the provisions of section 108 as it stood at the time of the impugned transaction therein ..... 6. after taking us through the company petition, counter, rejoinder, the details regarding civil suits, impugned order of the company law board and relevant provisions of the companies act, mr. a. alagiriswamy, learned senior counsel for the investors, and mr. p.h. aravindh pandian, learned counsel for the company, have raised the following contentions:(i) .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gurukul Ghatkeswar Trust

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... is not intended to benefit institutions engaged in commercial activities with the intention of earning profit. (m/s oxford university press v. commissioner of income tax1). the language of section 10 (22) of the act is plain and clear and the availability of the exemption thereunder is required to be evaluated each year to ascertain ..... thereto, the questions aforementioned have been referred to us for our opinion. question no.1: under section 10 (22) of the income tax act, any income of a university or other educational institution, existing solely for educational purposes and not for purposes of profit, is required not to be included in the total ..... institution, solely for educational purposes, and not for the purpose of profit, can be regarded as 'other educational institution' coming within section 10 (22) of the act. the purpose for which, and the object with which, the institution is established and the source from which the income is earned are relevant considerations to determine .....