Skip to content

Did you mean: station?


Testation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: testation Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 9,378 results (0.105 seconds)
Oct 25 2005 (SC)

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, CochIn Vs. S.T.N. Textile Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-25-2005

Reported in: (2005)199CTR(SC)209; JT2005(10)SC203; 2005(9)SCALE235; (2005)12SCC714

1 this appeal by special leave is directed against the judgement and order of the high court of kerala at...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2005 (SC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Chhabra Rice Mills and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-17-2005

Reported in: JT2005(10)SC483; (2006)142PLR726; 2005(9)SCALE450; (2005)13SCC221; [2006]144STC1(SC)

orderarijit pasayat j 1 the only question raised for consideration in this appeal is whether purchase tax can be charged...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2005 (SC)

Arvind Sud Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-25-2005

Reported in: (2005)13SCC475

1 we have heard counsel for the parties 2 it is apparent from our order dated 24th february 2004 that...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 14 2005 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax - Ii Vs. Shri E.V. Balashanmugham

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-14-2005

Reported in: (2006)206CTR(Mad)440; [2006]286ITR626(Mad)

b k raviraja pandian j 1 the revenue has preferred this appeal against the order of the income tax appellate...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 2005 (SC)

C.K. Jidheesh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-27-2005

Reported in: AIR2006SC444; (2005)199CTR(SC)212; 2005(103)ECC81; [2005]279ITR118(SC); JT2005(10)SC297; 2005(4)KLT770(SC); (2005)13SCC37; [2006]144STC322(SC)

s n variava j 1 by this writ petition the petitioner seeks to challenge a letter dated 9th july 2001...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 08 2005 (SC)

Ponni Sugars (Erode) Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-08-2005

Reported in: AIR2006SC496; JT2005(9)SC332; 2005(9)SCALE164; (2005)13SCC102; [2005]142STC543(SC)

ruma pal j 1 the appellant has a sugar mill and purchases sugarcane from cane growers an agreement was entered...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 2005 (HC)

M.B. Lal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-22-2005

Reported in: (2005)199CTR(Del)571; 124(2005)DLT324; 2005(84)DRJ563; [2005]279ITR298(Delhi)

t s thakur j 1 these two appeals arise out of a common order passed by the income tax appellate...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 2005 (HC)

Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam Senniappa ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-07-2005

Reported in: (2005)3MLJ149

..... as mutual wills wills which by agreement confer benefit on persons other than the testators without the testators conferring benefits on each other can also be mutual wills where there is an ..... properties under any circumstance he also submitted that there was no love lost between the testators and their relatives and hence they excluded all their relatives learned senior counsel submitted that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 2005 (HC)

Chanchal Kumar Das and ors. Vs. Pasupati Nath Das and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-04-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Cal212,2005(2)CHN289

..... render the will void when the will is executed by the testator in the free exercise of his judgment and volition similarly ..... unless the evidence removes such suspicion and clearly proves that the testator approved of the will laying down the same principle the apex ..... be indications that the disposition was not the result of the testator s free will and mind such suspicious circumstances make the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 2005 (HC)

Sasanka Sekhar Maity Vs. Dulal Kumar Maity and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-04-2005

Reported in: 2005(3)CHN259

..... their studies in school and college at kanthi in midnapore the testator permitted his son to reside at the monohorchak house as ..... doubt the propounder stated in his evidence that his father the testator signed in his presence but the propounder never stated that ..... maity therefore this departure from this admitted signature of the testator has not been explained in this connection about the evidence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //