Term - Judgment Search Results

Rhodia S.A. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... transactions including stock splits or reclassifications of capital stock on a perusal of the terms and conditions extracted above it is clear that the appellant though not directly owned ..... as one of the world s leading chemical manufacturers should benefit albright amp wilson in terms of technology expanded sales opportunities and greater financial resources the acquisition would add considerable .....

Cook Vs. Gralike

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to article viii of their state constitution designed to bring about a specified congressional term limits amendment to the federal constitution among other things article viii instruct s missouri ..... of article viii provides for automatic repeal of the article should the specified congressional term limits amendment be rati 516 respondent don gralike was a nonincumbent candidate for election .....

United Phosphorus Limited Vs. Joint Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2001)73TTJ(Ahd.)404

..... years the licensee incurred an expenditure for constructing the second floor in accordance with the terms settled with the licensor the honble bombay high court held that the expenditure incurred by ..... the payment of premium of leasehold in fact represents purchase price for acquisition of long term lease for 99 years which is transferable assignable and alienable subject to certain restrictions and .....

M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)83ITD511(Mum.)

..... called commerce centre or centre 1 inviting applications for allotment of office flats on long term lease basis the prospective allottees entered into a standardised lease agreement which stipulated payment ..... the right to refuse permission without assigning any reasons and or to stipulate such terms and conditions as the centre in its absolute discretion thought fit the agreement simultaneously .....

Traffix Devices, Inc Vs. Marketing Displays, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... its misinterpretation of trade dress principles in other respects in general terms a product feature is functional and cannot serve as a ..... by our circuit and more recently by the supreme court in terms of competitive need this was incorrect as a comprehensive definition ..... prove that those aspects do not serve a purpose within the terms of the utility patent the inquiry into whether such features .....

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. Vs. Army Corps of Engineers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... waters although the conference report includes the statement that the conferees intend that the term navigable waters be given the broadest possible constitutional interpretation s conf rep no 92 ..... necessary to expand its jurisdictional scope thus although congress opted to carryover the traditional jurisdictional term navigable waters from the rha and prior versions of the fwpca it broadened the .....

Whitman Vs. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... must be clear congress does not alter a regulatory scheme s fundamental details in vague terms or ancillary provisions see mci telecommunications corp v american telephone telegraph co 512 u ..... is legislative but nevertheless conclude that the delegation is constitutional because adequately limited by the terms of the authorizing statute alternatively we could pretend as the court does that the .....

Pga Tour, Inc. Vs. Martin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of any place of public accommodation 12182 a the phrase public accommodation is defined in terms of 12 extensive categories 12181 7 which the legislative history indicates should be construed ..... united states does not provide and i cannot conceive of any possible construction of the terms of title iii that will exclude employees while simultaneously covering independent contractors its concession .....

Egelhoff Vs. Egelhoff

Court: US Supreme Court

..... operate to divert benefit 146 plan proceeds from distribution under terms of the plan documents but merely alters the underlying circumstances ..... either follow washington s beneficiary designation scheme or alter the terms of their plan so as to indicate that they will ..... direct conflict or contradiction between the washington statute and the terms of the plan documents here at issue david egelhoff s .....

Brentwood Academy Vs. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... all but the purely ministerial acts by which the association exists and functions in practical terms only the 16 minority of private school memberships prevents this entwinement of the association ..... its public members and public officials acting as such was attested frankly as mentioned the terms of the state board s rule expressly designating the association as regulator of interscholastic .....