Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tamil nadu village servants conduct rules 1983 Page 1 of about 6,590 results (0.175 seconds)

V.YoharajA. Vs. the Special Commissioner or Director and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... he had amassed disproportionate wealth and submitted suspicious and dubious records, thereby violated rule 7(3)(d) of the tami nadu government servants conduct rules. ..... the directorate of vigilance and anti corruption had also recommended suitable disciplinary action against the petitioner for violation of government servants conduct rules. ..... for example, rule 3 of the central civil services (conduct) rules, 1964 which occurs under the heading general provides that every government servant shall at all times: (i) maintain absolute integrity;(ii) maintain devotion to duty; and(iii) do nothing which is unbecoming of a government servant. ..... it may be generally stated that the conduct rules of the government and public sector corporations constitute a code of permissible acts and behaviour of their servants.23. ..... based on the direction, a charge memo under rule 17(b) of the tamil nadu civil services (discipline and appeal) rules was framed against the petitioner with the following charges : (a)purchased a house site in survey no.825/24 in meelavittan village of tuticorin district measuring 10.5 cents with a built-up area (house) of 485 sq.ft. ..... (d)engaged himself in textile business, from 1983 through his wife tmt.vanaja without obtaining prior permission. ..... he had submitted a photo copy of bank accounts from the central bank of india, thoothukudi branch maintained from 24.6.1983 to 2.9.1989. .....

K. Rajendran and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC1107; 1982LabIC876; (1982)IILLJ259SC; 1982(1)SCALE342; (1982)2SCC273; [1982]3SCR628; 1982(1)SLJ604(SC); 1982(14)LC445(SC)

..... the tamil nadu village officers conduct rules provided that the tamil nadu government servants conduct rules, 1960 as amended from time to time would apply to the village officers subject to the modification specified in rule 3 thereof which provided that the village officers being part-time government servants might take up part-time work or occupation provided that (1) such part-time work or occupation did not interfere with their legitimate duties as village officers and (2) the previous permission in writing had been applied for and obtained ..... on the same date, the tamil nadu village officers (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1970 and the tamil nadu village officers conduct rules, 1970 promulgated under the proviso to article 309 of the constitution by the governor of tamil nadu came into force. ..... 20 of 1968, the governor of tamil nadu promulgated under the proviso to article 309 of the constitution the tamil nadu village officers service rules, 1970 providing for the constitution of the tamil nadu village officers service consisting of (i) village headman, additional village headman, (ii) village karnam, additional village karnam and (iii) talayari and nirganti and the method of recruitment to the said posts. .....

Dr. P. Elangovan Vs. the Commissioner and Secretary, Health and Family ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2008(4)MhLj670; (2008)4MLJ670

..... of 2003 on the file of the sub court, ariyalur and that if the said allegation contained in the impugned charge memo is proved that will certainly amount to violation of rule 8 of the tamil nadu government servants' conduct rules which called for necessary punishment and therefore, the petitioner will have to face an enquiry and vindicate his stand only in the enquiry. ..... chellapandian, who is a transport operator in vilangudi area, perambalur district and thereby violated rule 8 of the tamil nadu government servants' conduct rules, 1973, which prohibits such engagement in any trade or business either directly or indirectly, except with the previous sanction of ..... the petitioner by referring to the guidelines issued by the government in respect of rule 17(b) of the tamil nadu government servants (disciplinary & appeals) rules, contended that the state government itself has issued guidelines, wherein, it is stated that unless a major punishment of dismissal or removal from service or compulsory retirement or reduction to a lower rank in the seniority list or to a lower post or time scale, framing of charges under rule 17(b) and should be avoided and therefore, before the issuance of the charge memo ..... , poyyur village to kalavai village, he approached the tamil nadu administrative tribunal by filing o.a. ..... the petitioner was stated to have been promoted as senior civil surgeon and posted at government primary health centre, kadugur village, perambalur district, by order dated, 8.5.2002. .....

Mr.Selvanayagam Vs. the Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... , 331, 412, 413, 414, 416, 440, 442, 456, 459 and 3626 of kalathur east village 455 of kalathur west village and 1853 of sanankarai village with false particulars without field inspection and without verifying the coconut growers, which facilitated the traders and middlemen to sell copra in primary agricultural co-operative bank, chettipatty in the procurement of copra made between october 2000 and may 2001, and thereby he violated rule 20(1) of tamil nadu government servants' conduct rules 1973.3. ..... 118 and 119 of the tamil nadu state housing board act, 1961 (tamil nadu act no. ..... the state of tamil nadu and another), decided on 10.02.2011, wherein it has been held as ..... offered for the delay in finalising the audit account cannot stand scrutiny in view of the above two provisions of the tamil nadu act 17. ..... , tamil nadu housing board, 2005 (4) ctc 403, wherein this court was pleased to lay down as ..... are employees of the agricultural department of the state of tamil nadu. ..... as departmental proceedings are concerned, certainly, if any omission and commission has been committed by any government servant, the respondent department has got a right to initiate disciplinary proceedings. ..... is also the case of petitioners that identification was done on verification by the village administrative officer, therefore, petitioners prima facie cannot be held guilty of the charge ..... apart, the enquiry in pursuance of the said charge memo has been conducted after a lapse of 7 years and the same was over in 2005 .....

P.indiragandhi Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... you (accused officer1) have purchased the above properties without getting prior permission from the appropriate authority in your department and thus violated rule 7(1) (a) of the tamil nadu government servant conduct rules 1973. ..... you (accused officer 1) while working as assistant, district employment office, being a public servant have acquired immovable properties for sale amount of rs.35,010/- in the name of your husband tr.v.subramanian at kondur village, old survey no.75 and new r.s.no.32/3 from tr.thirugnanam s/o vardaraj semmandalam cuddalore with an extent of 2001 ..... you (accused officer 1) acquired immovable properties of plot no.5 for sale amount of rs.67,000/- in the name of your husband tr.v.subramanian at usuppur village in old survey no.5/5 and 5/6, new survey no.5/5b and 5/6b from tmt.tayam w/o r.seetharaman, thadandar nagar, chennai, with an extent of 2030 ..... buildings in the name your husband tr.v.subramanian at usuppur village in old survey no.5/5 and 5/6, new survey no.5/5b and 5/6b from tmt.jam w/o r.seetharaman, thandandar nagar, chennai, with an extent of 2030 ..... buildings in the name of your husband tr.v.subramanian, at kondur village in old survey no.75 and new survey no.32/3 with an extent of 2001 sq.ft. ..... this could be seen from the typed set of papers filed by the petitioner that the petitioner's husband written a letter to his department-the chief educational officer, pondicherry, seeking permission to purchase a property at kondur village, cuddalore.8. .....

V. Saravanan Vs. the Principal Secretary to Government Department of R ...

Court : Chennai

..... action patta has been issued illegally for a land owned by tamil nadu housing board in t.s.no.23/1, block 34, of thiruvanmiuyur village (old survey no.87/1) against all norms of government servant conduct rules, 1973." 8. ..... -triplicane taluk has put up a misleading note for calling of records from the tamil nadu housing board whether the land was actually acquired by the board, which is mischievous and highhanded one, since the land in s.no.87/1 of thiruvanmiuyur village was acquired by the tamil nadu housing board in the year 1986 and the registered holder of the land has also been clearly mentioned as tamil nadu housing board in the town survey land register. ..... the tamil nadu housing board appears to have made a complaint to the government alleging that an extent of 77 cents and 76.5 cents in survey nos.87/1 and 87/2a respectively of thiruvanmiyur village belonging to the board, were illegally transferred ..... the first charge alleged that the petitioner has put up a misleading note by calling for records from the tamil nadu housing board to ascertain as to whether the land was actually acquired by the board, which according to the department was mischievous and highhanded, in view of the fact that ..... wrong issue of patta to the individuals rather you have connived with the tahsildar when the land belonged to the tamil nadu housing board and put up a misleading note for calling of records from the tamil nadu housing board, whether the land was actually acquired by the board. .....

The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Chennai ...

Court : Chennai

..... charge v thus he has failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and acted in violation of rule 20(1) of the tamil nadu government servant's conduct rules 1973. 5. ..... the learned additional advocate general has also filed common written submissions and refering to the same has contended that there were several allegations that were levelled against thiru.arumugam, village administrative officer, sengundram village, changalpet taluk and the tahsildar in his enquiry has found that there were some serious lapses on part of him but however without considering these aspects, the respondent has ordered for his reinstatement ..... regarding charge no.4, the petitioner stated that during the general transfer 2004 in tambaram taluk, the vaos who have not completed one year service in the present village have requested transfer to tambaram taluk, since these vaos have not completed one year service in other taluks, it has been decided to consider their request during the next general transfer. ..... while the respondent was posted and working as revenue divisional officer at chengalpet, there were reports that a village administrative officer k.arumugam has unauthorisedly absented himself from duty and apart from this, there were other allegations also that were levelled against the said village administrative officer and accordingly, he was suspended from service vide order dated 26.07.2004 passed by the respondent herein. .....

G. Mary Jennie Vs. The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari Dist ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... on behalf of the respondent is that if the entire fields in the above survey numbers are assigned to the petitioner, it will jeopardise public interest and further the petitioner and her husband, who were government servants have violated the tamil nadu government servants conduct rules, 1973. ..... contra, it is the submission of the learned government advocate that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief of change of entries in the revenue records in respect of the lands in re-survey nos.606/1 and 607/3 of kollemcode village of vilavancode taluk as she has not complied with the requirements stipulated in the order of sub court, kuzhithurai. ..... under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to make necessary changes in the revenue records and assign the lands in survey no.607/3, 606/1 in kollamcode village, vilavancode taluk, kanyakumari district, within the time frame stipulated by this hon'ble court.) 1. ..... petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking an order of this court, directing the respondents to make necessary changes in revenue records and assign the lands in survey nos.607/3, 606/1 in kollamcode village, vilavancode taluk, kanyakumri district within the time determined by this court. 5. ..... 606/1, 606/2, 606/3, 607/3 at kollamcode village, vilavancode taluk, kanyakumari district and the total extent of the land is 74 cents and the same was purchased by her by two sale deeds in the years 1964 and .....

1.A.R.Saradha Devi Vs. 1.R.Jeyarani

Court : Chennai

..... 2.whether the commissioner had failed to appreciate the provisions of rule 8(a) & 8(aa) of tamil nadu government servants conduct rules of 1973 and whether the commissioner had cast the burden on the appellants erroneously to establish that the deceased was not employed by the 1st opposite party?. ..... whether the commissioner had erred in not appreciating that the deceased was a government servant and as such prima facie there cannot be any employer / employee relationship between him and 1st opposite party herein?. .....

S. Muthuramu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Chief Secretary to Go ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)3MLJ766

..... , as a quasi judicial authority, if anybody is aggrieved, the proper remedy is to file an appeal against the said order as contemplated under the act before the inspector general of registration and no misconduct for the alleged violation of the rule 20(1) of the tamil nadu government servants conduct rules, is attracted. ..... and thereby petitioner contravened the rule 20(1) of the tamil nadu government servants conduct rules, 1973. ..... it would follow that conduct which is blameworthy for the government servant in the context of conduct rules would be misconduct. ..... petitioner sent a reply to the said charge memo on 28.11.2005 and stated that he has followed rule 4 and 5 of the tamil nadu stamp (prevention of under-valuation of instruments) rules, 1968, and also inspected the property, received representation from the party and also verified the sales took place in the nearby lands within the vicinity and thereafter fixed the market value. ..... (c) on 20.8.2005, petitioner received a charge memo, framed under rule 17(b) of the tamil nadu civil services (discipline and appeal) rules, alleging that a loss of revenue to the government to the tune of rs. ..... ahmed : (1979)iillj14sc whereupon mr sharan himself has placed reliance, this court held so stating:code of conduct as set out in the conduct rules clearly indicates the conduct expected of a member of the service. ..... 25, 30, 32, 33 and 34 of block-6, ward-d of arakkonam municipality, ammanur village of arakkonam taluk, had been sold. .....