Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tamil nadu panchayats fifth amendment act 2008 Page 1 of about 1,970 results (0.229 seconds)

K.S.Subbiah Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court : Chennai

..... 2002, there was a state amendment to demand completion certificate / no objection certificate for effecting electricity service connection but later the same was withdrawn vide g.o.ms.no.112, energy (b1), dated 05.07.2004, whereby, the tamil nadu electricity board was directed not to insist on completion certificate / no objection certificate from the chennai metropolitan development authority with effect from 10.06.2003, as the said condition was inconsistent and contrary to the central act as the electricity supply is in the ..... even though by office circular dated 22.11.2006, had excluded insistence on production of completion certificate / no objection certificate for effecting service connection with respect of ordinary building, the same is superseded by the letter of the fifth respondent to tangedco vide letter dated 18.03.2013, whereby the same was clarified and insisted upon completion certificate/ no objection certificate for the buildings like the petitioner's buildings.6. ..... the highly competent counsel, mr.d.s.raajasekaran for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have constructed a building at plot in s.no.40/3, 7b1, 7c, sivaboohtam village, karambakkam, panchayat, vanagaram, chennai, as per the sanctioned plan vide permit no.c4327/33 a to d/2008 and file no.c2/1201/2007, dated 28.11.2008 for constructions of ground + 2 floors of industrial building. .....

India Cement Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC85; (1990)2GLR764; [1991]188ITR690(SC); JT1989(4)SC190; 1989(2)SCALE953; (1990)1SCC12; [1989]Supp1SCR692

..... deemed always to have been incorporated by the tamil nadu panchayats (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1964 being tamil nadu act 18 of 1964, which provided as follows;-[ ..... on every rupee of land revenue' were substituted for the words 'shall be subject to such maximum as may be prescribed' by section 3 of the tamil nadu panchayats1 (2nd amendment and validation) act, 1970, and these words were substituted for the words 'shall not exceed one rupee and fifty paise on every rupee of land revenue' by section 2 of the tamil nadu panchayats (amendment) act, 1972.9. ..... under section 115 of the madras panchayats act (xxxv of 1958) (hereinafter called 'the act'), as amended by madras act xviii of 1964 (hereinafter called 'the amended act'), as royalty the appellant was ..... ' this phrase-logy has been incorporated by an amendment in 1964 by the madras village panchayat amendment act, 1964 section 13 wherein the explanation to section 115 was substituted and substituted retrospectively wherein this royalty has also been included in the definition of 'land revenue' and ..... (2 a) the holder of a mining lease, whether granted before or after the commencement of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) amendment act, 1972, shall not be liable to pay any royalty in respect of any coal consumed by a workman engaged in a colliery provided that such consumption by the workman ..... cess by the act under section 115 is ultra vires and the respondent state of tamil nadu is restrained from .....

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . an explanation to the said section was added and was deemed always to have been incorporated by the tamil nadu panchayats (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1964 (amending act) which provided as under: explanation- in this section and in section 116, land revenue means public revenue due on land and includes water cess payable to the ..... . 15.9 the aforesaid conclusion was so arrived, inter alia, because the explanation to section 115 of the aforesaid amended tamil nadu act defined land revenue to include royalty, lease amount or any other sum payable to the government in respect of land held direct ..... with civil appeal no.7937 of 2019 with writ petition (civil) no.512 of 2018 with civil appeal no.7938 of 2019 with civil appeal no.7936 of 2019 with civil appeal no.6221 of 2008 with civil appeal no.5250 of 2019 with writ petition (c) no.729 of 2019 with writ petition (c) no.1029 of 2019 with special leave petition (c) no.16028 of 2021 with civil appeal no. ..... . fifthly, kesoram also failed to note that the parliament enacted the validation act, 1992 on the definite premise that the states did not have the legislative competence to levy the impugned levies which were rightfully set aside by ..... . (v) fifthly, to reiterate, when the value of minerals extracted is the basis of payment of royalty under the scheme of the mmdr act, 1957, which is a parliamentary legislation, such land cannot be construed to be falling within the scope and ambit of entry 49 - list ii also so .....

P. Subbulakshmi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ919

..... that she is entitled to hold office for the full term of five years upto 29th june 2008 is untenable; that ..... for re-constitution of 561 special grade village panchayat as town panchayats; that in the tamil nadu municipal laws (amendment) ordinance (tamil nadu ordinance 4/2000) promulgated on 14.07.2006, later repealed by tamil nadu municipal laws (amendment act 2006) - tamil nadu act 18 of 2006, special provisions relating to village panchayats constituted as town panchayat (section 3cc) have been inserted in the act; that by virtue of the said amendment, the petitioner is entitled to hold office upto such date as the state government fix in this behalf under the tamil nadu panchayats act, 1994, hence, the contention of the petitioner ..... the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents 3 and 4 and the learned counsel for the fifth respondent adopted the arguments advanced by the learned advocate general for the respondents 1 and 2 and prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.7. mr. .....

K.Arumugam Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... the second charge against the petitioner was that he had issued `no objection' certificates, in respect of the plots having an extent of 702 square feet, contrary to the provisions of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971, which contemplates that the plots should have a minimum extent of 900 square feet. ..... aggrieved by the said order the petitioner had preferred an appeal before the first respondent, after consulting the tamil nadu public service commission, as per regulation 18(1)(a) of the tamil nadu public service commission regulations, 1954. ..... the finding of the second respondent that the petitioner had misguided the council of the third respondent town panchayat, in passing the resolution, dated 1.7.2002, had not been substantiated with sufficient evidence.12. ..... (d) no.235, ma & ws department, dated 28.6.2011, and that of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his proceedings in na.no.ka11270/2005/a4, dated 5.01.2008 and quash the orders dated 28.6.2011 and 5.01.2008, respectively and consequently direct the 1st respondent to settle all the pensionary benefits of the petitioner. ..... the guidelines issued by the state government had been amended, subsequently, by the proceedings, dated 20.3.2002, amending certain clauses in the government order, dated 1.2.2001. ..... the fifth charge was that he had not issued `account payee' cheques to certain third parties, even though the cheque amount was above rs.500/-. .....

S.Nagamani Vs. 1.The District Registrar of Societies,

Court : Chennai

..... or direction, in the nature of writ directing the 1st respondent to conduct allampatti devangar mahajana sabai, virudhunagar, (registration no.12 of 1966) election based on the petitioners' representation dated 02.02.2015 as per the tamil nadu societies registration act and pass such further or other orders as this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the above facts and circumstances and thus render justice.?.7. ..... abinitio illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct allampatti devangar mahajana sabai, virudhunagar, (registration no.12 of 1966) election based on the petitioners' representation dated 02.02.2015 as per the tamil nadu societies registration act and pass such further or other orders as this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the above facts and circumstances and thus render justice.?. ..... as contended by the learned counsel for the respondents, absolutely there is no provision in the tamil nadu societies registration act to direct the district registrar of societies to conduct the election for the sabai. ..... regards the amendment prayer, the 5th respondent, election officer, is a private individual and he is not a statutory authority and hence the prayer sought to be amended which is against the fifth respondent is ..... constitution only relates to the elections held for parliament or the state legislative assemblies, the principle of that provision also applies to elections held under statutes such as municipal elections, panchayat elections, etc. .....

K.M. Vijayan and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995]214ITR93(Mad)

..... municipal council constituted under the tamil nadu district municipalities act, 1920; or (c) a panchayat constituted under the tamil nadu panchayats act, 1958; or (d)...........' ..... this batch of writ petitions, some petitioners seek a declaration that the tamil nadu tax on professions, trades, callings and employments act, 1992 (tamil nadu act 24 of 1992) (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), is ultra vires the power of the tamil nadu state legislature, and some others seek a declaration that article 276(2) of the constitution of india, as amended by the constitution (sixtieth amendment) act, 1988, itself, is violative of the proviso to article 368 of ..... powers under article 226 operate, would not necessarily take the case under the proviso'. 19. proceeding further, the supreme court observed as follows (at page 851) : 'if the effect of the amendment made in the fundamental rights on the powers of the high courts prescribed by article 226, is indirect, incidental, or is otherwise of an insignificant order, it may be that the proviso will not ..... (seventeenth amendment) act, 1964, by which article 31a, coming under part iii of the constitution, was amended, the argument was that though part iii was not expressly included in clauses (a) to (e) of the proviso to article 368(2), the abovesaid amendment of article 31a amounted to effect a 'change' in article 226, which comes under chapter v to part v1, one of the provisions, mentioned in clause (b) of the said proviso and that .....

S.R. Balasubramaniyan, M.L.A. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(3)CTC129; (2006)2MLJ244

..... commissioner from 62 to 65 years so as to enable the local bodies to use his knowledge and experience gained over a period; that the government of tamil nadu therefore decided to remove the restrictions as to the age and as to the maximum period of holding the office of the tamil nadu state election commissioner and amended sub-section (2) of section 239 of the tamil nadu panchayats act suitably for the said purpose and that article 243k(4) of the constitution of india permits the state legislature to make provisions ..... the legislative assembly of the state of tamil nadu passed the tamil nadu panchayats (second amendment) act, 2005 (act 15 of 2005) amending the provision of section 239(2) (b) of the tamil nadu panchayats act, 1994. ..... elections within the two successive terms of two years of reappointment and therefore, to enable the tamil nadu state election commissioner to use his knowledge and experience gained over a period to conduct atleast one general election to the said panchayats, the government decided to remove the restrictions as to the age and as to the maximum period for holding the office of the tamil nadu state election commissioner and to amend sub-section (2) of section 239 for the said purpose. ..... now he has been appointed for the third term for two years with effect from 2nd january 2006 to 1st january 2008. .....

Chinnakarupathal and ors. Vs. A.D. Sundarabai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC709; (2009)2MLJ764(SC); 2008(13)SCALE656; (2009)1SCC86:2008AIRSCW7986

..... in certain cases - where in execution of any decree, any immovable property, in which any person entitled to the benefits of the tamil nadu agriculturists relief (amendment) act, 1948, had an interest, has been sold or foreclosed on or after the 30th september, 1947, and the sale has not been confirmed before the commencement of the said act or ninety days have not elapsed from the confirmation of the sale or from the foreclosure, at such commencement, then, notwithstanding ..... anything contained in the indian limitation act, 1908 now the limitation act, 1963 (central act 36 of 193), or in the code of civil procedure, 1908 ..... of such commencement or of the confirmation of the sale, whichever is later, to set aside the sale or foreclosure of the property, and the court shall, if satisfied that the applicant is a person entitled to the benefits of the said act, order the sale or foreclosure to be set aside, and thereupon the sale or foreclosure shall be deemed not to have taken place at all:provided that no such order shall be made without notice to the decree- holder, the ..... the fifth respondent and predecessors of respondents 6 to 26 are stated to be the auction .....

S. Vimala Vs. the Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ11

..... it is their further submission that after chapter i-b has been inserted by the tamil nadu municipal laws (amendment) act (18/2006), the town panchayats have also been brought within the purview of the tamil nadu district municipalities act and therefore, town panchayats form part of the tamil nadu district municipalities act, in which event, unless and until the amendment is effected to section 40-a, the assistant director of town panchayat cannot have any jurisdiction to preside over the meeting and conduct elections and so on. ..... the tamil nadu district municipalities act in respect of district municipalities created under section 4 of the act are different and distinct from the town panchayats administered by the assistant directors of town panchayat and therefore, by appointing the assistant directors of town panchayat, the functions to perform under section 40-a of the act are borrowed from the said act for the purpose of town panchayats and it is well within the powers of the state government and there arises no question of amendment to the tamil nadu district municipalities act, because .....