Taker - Judgment Search Results

Lt. Col K.C. Bheemaiah Vs. Kakamada A. Kuttappa and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2004Kant224; ILR2003KAR4206; 2004(2)KarLJ349

thakur j 1 this is a plaintiffs appeal arising out of a suit for specific performance of an agreement to...

Karnataka State Co-operative Marketing Federation Vs. the Regional Dir ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2003KAR4422; (2004)ILLJ880Kant

thakur j 1 this appeal under section 82 of the esi act is directed against an order made by the...

Jirila Marak Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

amitava roy j 1 heard mr n s thakuria learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned state counsel...

Siyaka Marong Abdoulaya Vs. Mr. J.L. Pandey, Inspector of Customs (P) ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)108; 2003BomCR(Cri)1826

..... and taker would never meet each other and there would not be ..... a secret way somebody has to identify the giver and taker and somebody has to arrange the meeting safely of giver and taker unless such a security has been granted created giver .....

Bihar State Pollution Control Board Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2003(3)JCR181(Jhr)]

..... was employed by the management of the board at jamshedpur as sample taker on 15th december 1983 he was given the additional job of typist ..... high court that though the workman was initially appointed as a sample taker but in the year 1990 vide annexure 4 to the said writ ..... eight years or at least allow him to continue as a sample taker the court refrained to express any opinion in that regard as the .....

Brown Vs. Legal Foundation of Wash.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... constitutional issue focused on what an owner has lost not what the taker has gained and that petitioners had lost nothing while the case ..... constitutional issue focused on what an owner has lost not what the taker has gained and that petitioners hayes and brown had lost nothing ibid ..... the question is what has the owner lost not what has the taker gained boston chamber of commerce v boston 217 u s 189 .....

Jagar Nath Kaul Vs. State

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ429

..... witness is posted near the place where transaction between the bribe giver and the bribe taker takes place and the money to be offered as bribe is also sometime treated with ..... also be established that the demand was made it must also be established that bribe taker consciously accepted the money as bribe there must be recovery of the bribed money in .....

Grutter Vs. Bollinger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... assured of achieving the requisite score it is far from certain that the lsat test taker s behavior is responsive to the law school s admissions policies 16 nevertheless the possibility .....

Adarsh Rice Mill and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... was made under the special purchase scheme to help the appellants as there was no taker of their rice and the purchase has been made by the respondent corporation in terms .....

Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C., Etawah and ors. Vs. Hoti Lal and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1462; [2003(96)FLR1076]; JT2003(2)SC27; (2003)IILLJ267SC; 2003(2)SCALE54; (2003)3SCC605; [2003]1SCR1019; 2003(2)SLJ56(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1047

..... the punishment was considered disproportionate reasons are live links between the mind of the decision taker to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived at failure to give .....