Take - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: take Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 335 results (0.294 seconds)Mangalore Refinery and Vs. C.C.E., Bangalore
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jan-01-2002
Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT247Tri(Bang.)
barrier would be crossed when they are sought to be taken out of the customs and brought to the mass of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEastern Transformer and Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
Reported in: (2002)(105)LC439Tri(Kol.)kata
..... tribunal we dispense with the condition of predeposit of demand of duty and penalty and take up the main appeal itself for disposal 2 the short issue involved is that as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Siri Sri Plastics (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jul-05-2002
Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC710
..... amount was favour ably looked upon by him and was disposed with a direction to take it up with appropriate authority a it is admitted unit was availing ssi exemption during .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuru Ispat Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jul-04-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC713Tri(Kol.)kata
1 the appellants are aggrieved with the impugned order passed by the commissioner of customs port calcutta vide which he...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKirloskar Electric Company Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-28-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC89Tri(Bang.)alore
them then the useful resultant products intermediate or final are taken up for further manufacture or removal the remnant inputs after
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarbanslal Dawar Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (Prev.)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-28-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC934Tri(Mum.)bai
are in any event unable to see what manipulation has taken place the commissioner does not dispute that the bills of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunrise Structurals and Engg. P. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-28-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC625Tri(Mum.)bai
..... lies in the face of commercial reality no manufacturer would be so careless as to take such a stand in any event if the department sought to include the charges on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTata Iron and Steel Co. Limited Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jun-26-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC837
1 m s tata iron amp steel co limited here in referred to as tisco held an advance licence dt...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommr. of C. Ex. Vs. Annapurna Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC29
hence for corroboration these documents even if available cannot be taken as authentic moreover pmr and smrs are summary of all
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRahul Associates Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Icd
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2002
Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC845
..... the matter should have been taken after the dispatch of the goods that they could take up the matter regarding supply of shoes of chinese origin only after examination of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial