Suspect Classification - Judgment Search Results

San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. Vs. Rodriguez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... legislative judgments that interfere with fundamental constitutional rights footnote 39 or that involve suspect classifications footnote 40 if as previous decisions have indicated strict scrutiny means that ..... clause indeed for the several reasons that follow we find neither the suspect classification nor the fundamental interest analysis persuasive a the wealth discrimination discovered by .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... racial or ethnic minorities has received judicial approval without the exacting inquiry ordinarily accorded suspect classifications in lau we held that the failure of the san francisco school system to ..... held that a government practice or statute which restricts fundamental rights or which contains suspect classifications is to be subjected to strict scrutiny and can be justified only if it .....

Plyler Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... public schools may well be the type of invidiously motivated state action for which the suspect classification doctrine was designed the court held that it was unnecessary to decide whether the statute ..... of review has been reserved for instances in which a fundamental constitutional right or a suspect classification is present neither is present in these cases as the court holds footnote 3 3 .....

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534

..... propositions has been rejected in indian law and the indian constitution neither admits suspect classification nor strict scrutiny the constitutionality of quotas has been repeatedly affirmed and reliance ..... 65 the learned senior counsel also contended that the judicial review ideas of suspect classification strict scrutiny compelling state interest and narrow tailoring are measures propounded by the .....

Cleburne Vs. Cleburne Living Ctr.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... constitutional the court of appeals reversed holding that mental retardation is a quasi suspect classification that under the applicable heightened scrutiny equal protection test the ordinance was facially ..... no fundamental right was implicated and that mental retardation was neither a suspect nor a quasi suspect classification the court employed the minimum level of judicial scrutiny applicable to .....

City of Richmond Vs. J. A. Croson Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... seem to be simply administrative convenience which standing alone cannot justify the use of a suspect classification under equal protection strict scrutiny pp 488 u s 507 508 justice o connor joined ..... effects of prior discrimination cannot justify a rigid line drawn on the basis of a suspect classification see frontiero v richardson 411 u s 677 411 u s 690 1973 plurality opinion .....

Harris Vs. Mcrae

Court: US Supreme Court

..... substantive rights we now conclude as well that it is not predicated on a constitutionally suspect classification in reaching this conclusion we again draw guidance from the court s decision in maher ..... in maher found no basis for concluding that the connecticut regulation was predicated on a suspect classification it is our view that the present case is indistinguishable from maher in this respect .....

B. Archana Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, La ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(6)ALD582; 2005(6)ALT364

..... to them set aside benefits for educational and public employment opportunities would constitute a suspect classification such classifications must be subjected to the most exacting judicial examination and the state must ..... a brief survey of the standards of judicial review and scrutiny applied to test suspect classifications by the u s decisions held that though the state has substantial latitude in .....

Sugarman Vs. Dougall

Court: US Supreme Court

..... invalidating the state legislation here involved contains no language concerning inherently suspect classifications or for that matter merely suspect classifications the principal purpose of those who drafted and adopted the ..... suggest to the slightest degree that it was intended to render alienage a suspect classification that it was designed in any way to protect discrete and insular minorities .....

Nyquist Vs. Mauclet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... disability the statutes therefore involved the precise infirmity which led this court to accord aliens suspect classification treatment the line drawn by the legislature was drawn on the basis of a status ..... dougall 413 u s 634 1973 and therefore agree with the court that classifications based on alienage are inherently suspect but nonetheless feel that this case is wrongly decided in those cases .....