Skip to content


Supervisor - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: supervisor Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.014 seconds)
Mar 12 2014 (HC)

Cachar Paper Mill Officers and Supervisors Association and Another Vs. ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-12-2014

a m sapre cj 1 heard mr d mazumdar learned for the petitioner and mr j roy learned counsel appearing...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2014 (HC)

Hindustan Paper Corp. Ltd. Officers and Supervisors Association Vs. M. ...

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Mar-10-2014

a m sapre cj 1 heard mr d mazumdar learned for the petitioner and mr j roy learned counsel appearing...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2014 (HC)

H. Lalhrilmawia and Another Vs. State of Mizoram and Others

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Apr-10-2014

..... were created under the centrally sponsored scheme and that the petitioners while being appointed as supervisors were appointed under the css which is clearly borne out by their appointment orders he ..... had determined the date for fixing seniority by reckoning the services rendered while serving as supervisors the state respondents having come to know of the mistake committed by them have tried .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2014 (HC)

Sona Chawla Vs. Indian Airlines Ltd. (Now Known as Nacil)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-31-2014

..... the prescribed weight limits vi the deployment as ground staff whether as flight kitchen supervisor or otherwise was a temporary arrangement therefore the respondent having exercised its right not ..... on requirement but with option admittedly the petitioner continued uninterruptedly as a flight kitchen supervisor between 2001 and 2008 there is no reference whatsoever in the impugned order to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2014 (HC)

Sangita Garg Vs. Indian Airlines Ltd. (Now Known as Nacil)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-31-2014

..... the prescribed weight limits vi the deployment as ground staff whether as flight kitchen supervisor or otherwise was a temporary arrangement therefore the respondent having exercised its right not ..... on requirement but with option admittedly the petitioner continued uninterruptedly as a flight kitchen supervisor between 2001 and 2008 there is no reference whatsoever in the impugned order to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2014 (HC)

R.Chandramo Vs. the District Manager,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-02-2014

..... counsel common order w p md no 5341 2014 the petitioner was appointed as shop supervisor by the tamil nadu state marketing corporation limited hereinafter referred to as the tasmac by ..... team found that the salesman collected excess amount from the customers the petitioners being the supervisors failed to take any action the respondents after suspending the petitioners from service issued them .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2014 (HC)

Punita Bakshi Vs. National Aviation Company of India Ltd. (Nacil)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-31-2014

..... the prescribed weight limits vi the deployment as ground staff whether as flight kitchen supervisor or otherwise was a temporary arrangement therefore the respondent having exercised its right not ..... on requirement but with option admittedly the petitioner continued uninterruptedly as a flight kitchen supervisor between 2001 and 2008 there is no reference whatsoever in the impugned order to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2014 (HC)

Prasobh K Vs. Union of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-30-2014

..... pin 673 571 3 3 wp c no 26194 2014 25 saphia p data entry supervisor mrcmpu ltd hq kunnamangalam kozhikode pin 673 571 26 rekha gopinathan marketing organizer mrcmpu ltd ..... karthika 1936 wp c no 26194 of 2014 y petitioner s 1 prasobh k senior supervisor hg mrcmpu ltd p amp i unit kallepully po palakkad 2 elizebath thomas junior .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Lufthansa German Airlines Vs. SudhIn Sarkar and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-17-2014

..... 05 1999 received from respondents brought to their notice that they were working as supervisors and had been performing supervisory duties the respondents had been indulging in certain activities ..... illegal having held that the petitioner had succeeded in proving that the respondents were supervisors and discharging supervisory duties as functional heads the learned tribunal ought to have dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Lufthansa German Airlines Vs. SudhIn Sarkar and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-17-2014

..... 05 1999 received from respondents brought to their notice that they were working as supervisors and had been performing supervisory duties the respondents had been indulging in certain activities ..... illegal having held that the petitioner had succeeded in proving that the respondents were supervisors and discharging supervisory duties as functional heads the learned tribunal ought to have dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //