Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sugar development fund act 1982 section 5 applications for loans or grants Page 4 of about 2,080 results (0.192 seconds)

Jan 30 1999 (HC)

Somasundaram Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd,. Owners of Somasundaram Super Spi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC364; (2000)ILLJ340Mad

..... there were around 230 employees working in the mills. m/s somasundaram super spinning mill was taken over by government of india under industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 (central act lxv of 1951) and the management was vested with tamil nadu textile corporation limited as 'authorised person' on 7.12.1997. later the ..... question is no longer res integra. there was a similar provision like the one contained in chapter iv of the adhiniyam which existed in the u.p. sugar undertaking acquisition act, 1971, which enabled the management of the acquired undertakings being taken over by the state government. a contention was raised in ishwari khetan's case, ..... 13240 spindles by the petitioner. due to inefficient management, the mill incurred heavy loss and unable to pay statutory dues like employees state insurance, employees provident fund and electricity bills. workers were also not paid wages from 1.8.1976. consequently the mill remained closed with effect from 8.10.1976. at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2001 (HC)

Parshadi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT436

..... severe pressure on civil services, in the context of the inadequate supply of affordable housing by public and private sector and acute shortage of funds for the development of settlements and extension of city level infrastructure. this has been aggravated by institutional deficiencies of housing agencies and local bodies, and insufficient ..... , be laid down by government before permitting private developers to take up large scale constructions in the national capital territory, so that they fulfill their part of the society obligations like payment of a prescribed amount into a 'shelter fund' under the ulcar act and/or construction of a specified percentage of house ..... purpose, a revolving fund has been placed at the disposal of delhi admn. (land & bldg. deptt.) out of which the cost of acquisition is met. the lands so acquired, amongst others, are placed at the disposal of the delhi development authority under section 22(1) of delhi development act, 1957 for development and disposal. these .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2000 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Kakhar Karkha ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2000)163CTR(Bom)275; [2000]111TAXMAN176(Bom)

..... receipts.(b) deductions from the cane-price in respect of area development fund, hutment fund, cane development fund - it is contended on behalf of karkhana that funds under above heads are collected by way of deductions to enable the sugar karkhana to spend within their area of operation expenditure on amenities such ..... in not following the madhya pradesh high court's decision in the case of jiwajirao sugar co. ltd. v. cit : [1989]176itr182(mp) , in respect of the area development fund and cane development fund ?'2. the above questions also form part of various appeals referred to above, preferred ..... as, running of schools, colleges, maintenance of roads, irrigation, supply of fertilizers and to provide huts to homeless families. it is urged that the assessee acts .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2000 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2001]245ITR498(Bom)

..... in not following the madhya pradesh high court's decision in the case of jiwajirao sugar co. ltd. v. cit : [1989]176itr182(mp) , in respect of the area development fund and cane development fund?'2. the above questions also form part of various appeals referred to above, preferred by ..... (b) deductions from the cane price in respect of area development fund, hutment fund, cane development fund:it is contended on behalf of the karkhana that funds under the above heads are collected by way of deductions to enable the sugar karkhana to spend within their area of operation expenditure on amenities ..... such as running of schools, colleges, maintenance of roads, irrigation, supply of fertilizers and to provide huts to homeless families. it is urged that the assessee acts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2008 (HC)

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court : Guwahati

..... quid pro quo in the strict sense is not the one and only true index of a fee.58. on a scrutiny of the scheme of the haryana rural development fund act, 1983, the constitutional validity whereof was challenged, the division bench of the apex court in om prakash agarwal and others (supra), returned a finding that the purposes ..... fee levied and the services rendered has stood the test of time, the same being in substance reiterated and re-affirmed in ram chandra kailash kumar (supra), and belsund sugar co. ltd. (supra). in jindal stainless ltd. (supra), as well the constitution bench of the apex court propounded as well that compensatory tax is a sub-class ..... traders and ors. v. state of andhra pradesh and ors.7. : [1987]164itr376(sc) , om prakash agarwal and ors. v. gri raj kishori and ors.8. : air1999sc3125 , belsund sugar co. ltd. v. state of bihar and ors.9. : [2006]283itr1(sc) , indian stainless ltd (2) & anr v. state of haryana and ors.various excerpts from constitutional law by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1990 (HC)

Telecom Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Scheduled Cast ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR3320

..... established for the purpose of running schools, there is no institution or individual who could be allotted sites. the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, (for the 'the act'), and the rules made thereunder do not recognise any person or class of persons who have joined together for the purpose of allotment of ..... [1977]3scr312 .14. having regard to the above arguments, two questions arise for our determination namely:-(i) under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, whether the bangalore development authority has power to make bulk allotments, and what is the scope of section 38?(ii) whether the government have power to issue directions to ..... the various legal procedure that will have to be complied with for acquiring the land for its development schemes. the same pattern of legislation is found in similar other acts, viz., k.i.d. act, karnataka area development boards act etc. if the b.d.a. were to be given the power to reconvey the land .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 1996 (HC)

M/S. Tiveni Engineering Works Ltd. and Another Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All420

..... ., khatoli). the pressnote speaks of a decision on the part of the government to grant industrial licence under the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951, for the establishment of expansion of sugar factories in areas of assured sugurcane availability with potential for further development of sugarcane. it indicates that the guidelines spoken of were broad ones and the basic criterion for establishment of a ..... rights and procedure concerning purchase of sugarcane in reserved and assigned areas.8. so far as the establishment of sugar factories is concerned, it is controlled by the central government under the industrial development and regulation act, 1951. under section 3(i) of this act, a schedule industry means any of to industries specified in the 1st schedule. in the said schedule, at item .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1982 (HC)

Ram Puri, Chandigarh Vs. Chief Commissioner, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1982P& H301

..... court in jagdish chand radhey shyam v. state of punjab, (c. a. no. 1099 of 1967) declared s. 9 of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952 (punjab act xxvii of 1952), as in force in the union territory of chandigarh, as being violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(f) of the constitution and held that ..... supreme court in jagdish chand radhey shyam v. state of punjab, (civil appeal no. 1099 of 1967) declared section 9 of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952 (punjab act xxvii of 1952), as in force in the union territory of chandigarh, as being violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(f) of the constitution and held ..... as to costs.s.s. sandhawalia, c.j.45. whether the resumption designedly envisaged by the legislature inserting s. 8-a in the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952, connotes in essence a divestiture of title, and not merely a temporary divesting of possession only is one of the significant questions, which has necessitated this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1969 (SC)

New Savan Sugar and Gur Refining Co., Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC1062; [1969]74ITR7(SC); (1969)1SCC621; [1969]3SCR761

..... determining the written down value, unlike the initial allowance granted under the second paragraph of clause (vi). clause (vi-b) was inserted by the finance act, 1955. it grants development rebate in respect of machinery and plant provided that the machinery or plant is new and has been installed after the 31st march, 1954; and provided ..... both the questions against the assessee holding that the income was liable to be assessed under section 12 and that no additional depreciation and development rebate could be allowed.section 10 of the act stood as follows at the material time :10. (1) the tax shall be payable by an assessee under the head 'profits and ..... officer assessed the income under section 12 of the act as being income under the head 'other sources' and held that no additional depreciation or development rebate could be allowed as claimed by the assessee. according to the assessee, the income derived from the lease of the sugar factory was income from business because the factory was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 17 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-iii Vs. WavIn India Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1983]143ITR281(Mad)

..... the present case manifests a difference. while wavin undertook to provide technical information, patents, licences and also research and development, the agreement did not provide for any consideration to pass from the indian company to wavin in respect thereof. the ..... purchase and spraying of insecticides and other items which were essential for the production of sugarcane and for the manufacture of sugar. as a part of the scheme, bore-wells were dug up, godowns were constructed, culverts were built, and ..... that it must be regarded as revenue in nature. the learned judge observed that the assessee had only contributed funds for the implementation of a general scheme, and the general object of the scheme was only to improve the ..... expenditure on scientific research. the supreme court, however, held that the expenditure allowable under this particular provision in the act was confined to scientific research expenditure laid out by the assessee himself and which directly related to the assessee's .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //